More progress on Era metadata ??

When will more progress be made on Era metadata? I realize that the older works take more time to sift through since pub date and authorship date are likely very different, but most of the newer works are pretty straightforward as far as era dating. Most all in this list would be in the Contemporary category easily.

Any idea on when these works will be updated?

Is the lack of data due to the fact that most are type:Study Bible? If so, will these eventually get Era dating?

Thanks!

Find more posts tagged with

Comments

Kyle G. Anderson

These have been updated. Thanks.

SineNomine

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/1187613#Comment_1187613

These have been updated.

Could you make the Faithlife Biblical and Theological Lists commentaries Contemporary as well? Thanks!

Kyle G. Anderson

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/1187636#Comment_1187636

These have been updated.

Could you make the Faithlife Biblical and Theological Lists commentaries Contemporary as well? Thanks!

One step ahead of you! I did an audit yesterday of anything that was missing an Era classification and I think we got everything.

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/1187743#Comment_1187743

Hi Kyle,

Would you do a similar audit on the Type classifications (which is more important to me than Era)?

Thanks!

SineNomine

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/1187743#Comment_1187743

One step ahead of you! I did an audit yesterday of anything that was missing an Era classification and I think we got everything.

Great! I'm just waiting for my installation to notice the update.

Kyle G. Anderson

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/1187747#Comment_1187747

Hi Kyle,

Would you do a similar audit on the Type classifications (which is more important to me than Era)?

Thanks!

PL

Absolutely. I actually put in a case to add any missing Type classifications at the same time we finished up this work. Type classification requires more analysis so it will require a bit more effort. We hope to get it started next week.

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/1187781#Comment_1187781

Thanks Kyle! You're wonderful!

Mattillo

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/1187800#Comment_1187800

Kyle’s the Man!

Myke Harbuck

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/1187613#Comment_1187613

These have been updated. Thanks.

Thanks Kyle.

Follow ups...

Can you add an Era to all of the resources in this series?

And should the no-era classification show when there no resources without an era? Seems as if this wouldn't be the expected behavior, so I thought I'd ask.

Kyle G. Anderson

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/1187810#Comment_1187810

Myke

I'll keep an eye on this. I'm able to reproduce your reproduce some of your results, but not all.

The updates were pushed to the server yesterday but it's looking like some of the updates aren't available yet.

Kyle G. Anderson

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/1187845#Comment_1187845

I figured out what was happening and got it cleaned up. If you notice any entries missing an era classification please let me know. It's an incredibly simple fix on our end.

SineNomine

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/1187994#Comment_1187994

If you notice any entries missing an era classification please let me know. It's an incredibly simple fix on our end.

Will do. None missing in my collection at the moment.

Dare I ask about improvements to Denomination data?