Creating a Visual Filter with BHQ

Is there currently any work-around to create a visual filter with BHQ?

It does not show up as an available resource under "morph resources."

I would say "No" to a workaround...

But does it have a morphology and is it a bible or another Type? 

Is it listed when you try a Morph Search in the Search tool?

Thanks Dave—

It says "type" is "Bible" for BHQ. In morph search, BHQ does not show. 

— Assuming Logos engineers have a good reason for having BHS all tagged up morphologically but not the BHQ (?).

— Assuming Logos engineers have a good reason for having BHS all tagged up morphologically but not the BHQ (?).

You mean something like BHS was printed with morphological coding and BHQ was not? The morphology coding in the BHS is not the same as the Logos Hebrew morphology.

It was another way of stating what I asked above, about BHQ not showing up as an available resource under "morph resources" — what is it that you are talking about?

Right - it is not tagged with a morphology and therefore is not a morph resource (short for morphologically tagged resource).

That's right. 

I use BHS with visual filters (on right side). But it would be useful if this could be done with bHQ (left side). — I posted the request to Logos' suggestions page. Hopefully it gets up-voted! 

https://logos.feedbear.com/boards/logos-desktop-app/posts/tag-bhq-morphologically-please

By definition one cannot create a morphological visual filter on a resource that doesn't have (1) morphological tagging directly on the text OR (2) morphological tagging indirectly through a reverse interlinear. 

— Assuming Logos engineers have a good reason for having BHS all tagged up morphologically but not the BHQ (?).

Curious if have Biblia Hebraica Westmonasteriensis with Westminster Hebrew Morphology 4.18 (BHW) ?

Keep Smiling [:)]

Thanks—I do have that resource—but it does not link up to BHQ. 

BHQ seems to be morphologically tag-less! 

Please up-vote it!

https://logos.feedbear.com/boards/logos-desktop-app/posts/tag-bhq-morphologically-please

Years ago, Vincent Setterholm worked for Faithlife, who provided Westminster Morphological insights in 2014 thread => BHS and BHW (along with mentioning BHS, SESB, BHQ, BHW having contract negotiations and royalties, which may be relevant for BHQ not having morphology tagging).

Reply by Bradley Grainger (Faithlife) on 11 Feb 2014 mentions six deprecated Hebrew Bible resources.

FYI: my preferred Hebrew Bible is the Lexham Hebrew Bible (LHB), which has been enhanced by Faithlife: e.g. Clause Search.

 Keep Smiling [:)]

The J. Alan Groves Center for Advanced Biblical Research gives the current state of most of the BHS family of manuscripts, morphological coding, etc.

Judging from MJ's reference, the Westminster 4.22 morphs was (is?) coming. But it's not easy to see latest status. I looked at Accordance ... I don't have their Quinta, but the detailed contents don't mention morphs .... they do include massorah .... surprising.

I never spent much time on the Quinta text; instead the apparatus for differences, since it's a Leningrad overlay, to replace BHS. But it'll be nice to have a morph'd resource.

Thank you if you've up-voted the feature request. The appeal of the BHQ (for me) is the critical apparatus. It would be cool, though, to be able to do morph searches just with BHQ... like other resources of the Bible "Type" in Logos.