Citation from Logos to MS Word on Mac

Janick Fortier
Janick Fortier Member Posts: 12
edited November 21 in English Forum

I've just changed from PC to Mac and I'm having difficulties when I cite a passage from a book on Logos to MS Word. I'm used to have an automatic footnote, in Turabian footnote style, but now I get a footnote in a bibliography style (e.g. the author's last name first and no page number). 

My program settings are the same as I had on my PC.

I've tried to find in the training section and forum an answer to this problem, but found nothing. 

Thanks for your help!

Tagged:

Comments

  • MJ. Smith
    MJ. Smith MVP Posts: 53,136

    bumping in hopes of encouraging an answer 4

    Orthodox Bishop Alfeyev: "To be a theologian means to have experience of a personal encounter with God through prayer and worship."; Orthodox proverb: "We know where the Church is, we do not know where it is not."

  • Jack Caviness
    Jack Caviness MVP Posts: 13,489

    when I cite a passage from a book on Logos to MS Word. I'm used to have an automatic footnote, in Turabian footnote style, but now I get a footnote in a bibliography style (e.g. the author's last name first and no page number). 

    What version of Lorog? What Mac OS? I have Logos 9.11 Beta 1 and Mac OS 12.0.1. Turabian footnotes appear correctly formatted, as they did previously in Logos 9.10. In fact, I do not recall ever seeing this particular problem with Logos on the Mac OS.

  • Janick Fortier
    Janick Fortier Member Posts: 12

    I'm running Logos 9.10 and Monterey 12.1.

    For instance, when I copy a text I get this:  

    "According to Deuteronomy 18:18–19, a true prophet speaks 'in the name of the Lord,' with words put into the prophet’s mouth by God. Claim of divine inspiration is central to such a call."

    Brenneman, J. E. 2012. “True and False Prophecy.” In Dictionary of the Old Testament: Prophets, edited by Mark J. Boda and Gordon J. McConville, 783. Downers Grove, IL; Nottingham, England: IVP Academic; Inter-Varsity Press.

    This is the bibliography style, and not the footnotes style. 

  • Graham Criddle
    Graham Criddle MVP Posts: 32,478

    This is the bibliography style, and not the footnotes style. 

    When I copy the same text (using the same version of Logos on Monterey 12.0), I get a footnote reference

    What setting do you have for Citation Style?

  • Janick Fortier
    Janick Fortier Member Posts: 12

    The result is the same, whether I "Copy Footnotes as" Footnotes, text or Auto. 

    Are there other settings I can adjust?

    Thanks,

  • JT (alabama24)
    JT (alabama24) MVP Posts: 36,489

    I get a footnote reference

    Can you should us what you have Graham? 

    Here is what I got when I pasted into this thread: 

     Brenneman, J. E. 2012. “True and False Prophecy.” In Dictionary of the Old Testament: Prophets, edited by Mark J. Boda and Gordon J. McConville, 783. Downers Grove, IL; Nottingham, England: IVP Academic; Inter-Varsity Press.

    I am on macOS 12.1

    Here is what the info panel looks like:

    I am not an expert in citations. Janick is calling this a Bibliographic style, but I don't think it is. The bibliography should look like the top one. A footnote citation should have the page numbers, which it does. The bibliographic style should not have page numbers. 

    macOS, iOS & iPadOS | Logs |  Install

  • Graham Criddle
    Graham Criddle MVP Posts: 32,478

    A footnote citation should have the page numbers, which it does. The bibliographic style should not have page numbers. 

    You are right

    Interestingly there is a difference in the way the Turabian 8th edition handles this compared to the 9th.

    The 8th has the page number at the end whereas the 9th has it before the publisher information (as per your and Janick's screenshot).

    The 8th also has the author's first name at the beginning of the footnote whereas the 9th has it after the family name.

    Janick - is this difference what you are referring to?

  • Jack Caviness
    Jack Caviness MVP Posts: 13,489

    Interestingly there is a difference in the way the Turabian 8th edition handles this compared to the 9th.

    Thank you for that information. After reading this, I checked, and I do have 8th edition selected. After looking at the differences, I will stick to 8. But then, I am not submitting academic papers [:P]

  • Janick Fortier
    Janick Fortier Member Posts: 12

    I am not an expert in citations. Janick is calling this a Bibliographic style, but I don't think it is. The bibliography should look like the top one. A footnote citation should have the page numbers, which it does. The bibliographic style should not have page numbers. 

    In the screenshot, the first citation is of the book (the Dictionary); the second is of the article in the Dictionary. Both are the Bibliography format. The pages are for the article as a whole, not the pages where a specific quotation can be found in a footnote. 

    I tried changing to Turabian 8th ed. and it works: 

    J. E. Brenneman, “True and False Prophecy,” in Dictionary of the Old Testament: Prophets, ed. Mark J. Boda and Gordon J. McConville (Downers Grove, IL; Nottingham, England: IVP Academic; Inter-Varsity Press, 2012), 783.

    (note the author's name beginning with the first name, the parenthesis and the page number at the end). 

    I also tried "Chicago Manual of Style", which is what Turabian is actually based on and it works too. It's a bit different: 

    J. E. Brenneman, “True and False Prophecy,” ed. Mark J. Boda and Gordon J. McConville, Dictionary of the Old Testament: Prophets (Downers Grove, IL; Nottingham, England: IVP Academic; Inter-Varsity Press, 2012), 783.

    However, I'm not sure what version of the Chicago Manual of Style (CMS) it is. The 8th version of Turabian is closer to the 9th than the CMS. 

    I will use the 8th version. Is there a way to report that to Logos, so they can fix it? 

    Thanks everyone!

  • JT (alabama24)
    JT (alabama24) MVP Posts: 36,489

    In the screenshot, the first citation is of the book (the Dictionary); the second is of the article in the Dictionary. Both are the Bibliography format. The pages are for the article as a whole, not the pages where a specific quotation can be found in a footnote.

    Again, I am not an expert in citations. If I am understanding you correctly, you believe that a bibliographic citation of an article in Turbian <should> have the page numbers for the entirety of the article. Is that right? 

    macOS, iOS & iPadOS | Logs |  Install

  • Janick Fortier
    Janick Fortier Member Posts: 12

    Hi, 

    Yes, in the bibliography, the citation needs to include the page span of the article for a Dictionary like the one I used in example. Turabian's "Notes-Bibliography Style" indicates how to cite in a note (footnote or endnote) and how to cite in the bibliography. The bibliography indicates the total span of the article (same thing for an article coming from a Journal) and the note indicates the page of the quoted text. 

    This being said, you can also make a reference to an entire article in a footnote, where the page span would be included. It can get confusing... Still, the reference would be different from a bibliographic entry:

    Notes: Willem A. VanGemeren, “Prophets, the Freedom of God, and Hermeneutics,” The Westminster Theological Journal 52, no. 1 (1990): 79–99.
    BibliographyVanGemeren, Willem A. “Prophets, the Freedom of God, and Hermeneutics.” The Westminster Theological Journal 52, no. 1 (1990): 79–99.

    I hope this clarifies...