ATTN: Mark Barnes ... speaking of Logos 10
I'm currently working on a project that requires careful documentation which is bringing me face to face with some of the most frustrating features/non-features of Logos.
- The books that are split into many parts need to be able to be brought back together as a single resource with a single, accurate bibliographic entry.
- The many resources NOT in Logos, need to be able to be added to the library so that one can regenerate the Bibliography including them. Yes, we can add them to the exported Bibliography but that may need to be done many times in the course of a project.
Orthodox Bishop Alfeyev: "To be a theologian means to have experience of a personal encounter with God through prayer and worship."; Orthodox proverb: "We know where the Church is, we do not know where it is not."
Comments
-
Yup.
0 -
I would support that provided that the reference information for footnotes identified the proper volume/page.
WIN 11 i7 9750H, RTX 2060, 16GB RAM, 1TB SSD | iPad Air 3
Verbum Max0 -
Are you talking specifically about the Bibliography document here, or something else?
0 -
Preferably both the library panel and the Bibliography.
Orthodox Bishop Alfeyev: "To be a theologian means to have experience of a personal encounter with God through prayer and worship."; Orthodox proverb: "We know where the Church is, we do not know where it is not."
0 -
I appreciate the problem, although with a library the size of Logos, it's a big problem to solve. Being realistic, I'd be surprised if it happened soon - unless there's a significant demand, of course.
0
