Attn. Kyle: Possible resources that should not have subject Bible-Commentaries

Dave Hooton

Doubtful resources with subj:Bible-Commentaries

Word Biblical Commentary, Volume 50: Jude, 2 Peter
The NET Bible First Edition Notes
Holman Bible Handbook
Willmington’s Bible Handbook
Handfuls on Purpose for Christian Workers and Bible Students, Series I–XIII
The Apologetics Study Bible: Real Questions, Straight Answers, Stronger Faith

Find more posts tagged with

Comments

David Taylor, Jr.

Aren't subjects LOC as well as Faithlife?

Dave Hooton

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/1206920#Comment_1206920

Aren't subjects LOC as well as Faithlife?

LOC??

If I understand your comment, Faithlife books have Subjects that cannot be changed by the user.

MJ. Smith

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/1207068#Comment_1207068

LOC = Library of Congress.

I had the same thought as David but with a bit of research convinced myself that FL has strayed from straight LOC data.

David Taylor, Jr.

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/1207091#Comment_1207091

LOC = Library of Congress.

I had the same thought as David but with a bit of research convinced myself that FL has strayed from straight LOC data.

Yeah I believe I heard MP say once it is a mix.

NB.Mick

Doubtful resources with subj:Bible-Commentaries

Word Biblical Commentary, Volume 50: Jude, 2 Peter

I think several of the WBC bible commentaries have this subject (in full it reads Bible--Commentaries--Collected Works for those 18 volumes in my library) and while possibly redundant, given the Bible OT/Bible NT subjects present, I'm not sure why this seems doubtful. It's inconsistent, yes.

Dave Hooton

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/1207159#Comment_1207159

while possibly redundant, given the Bible OT/Bible NT subjects present, I'm not sure why this seems doubtful. It's inconsistent, yes.

It conflicts with Single-volume commentaries that use Bible--Commentaries. as the subject (to avoid listing individual bible books).

Bible.O.T.--Commentaries and Bible.N.T.--Commentaries also avoid listing individual books.

xnman

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/1207465#Comment_1207465

I agree with Dave. And to think about it, doesn't redundance cause a certain amount of confusion when searching?

Thanks Dave.

SineNomine

Doubtful resources with subj:Bible-Commentaries

At least some individual Hermeneia volumes also have that subject. Likewise WBC 23A: Ecclesiastes, and probably others.