Reverse Interlinear in NIV

Is there a way to turn off some of these lines

For the inline interlinear, you can select the lines you want shown from the dropdown menu

For the ribbon, you can right-click the line titles and select the ones you want

I had already looked at this dropdown.  It changes the inline interlinear, but there is nothing like this for reverse interlinear.  When you check the reverse interlinear there are no additional check boxes.

I think you want to change the reverse interlinear ribbon: Right click the row indicator at the left, then you can select the rows to be displayed 

The resource chosen determines the type of interlinear. While there are other options, the primary choices are:

• On an original language resource: Interlinear with a reader's edition alternative view
• On a translated resource: Reverse interlinear with an alternative pane/ribbon view

all the interlinears and reverse interlinears (for the most part) are show as separate resources

Yes

which means I should be able to choose one of them and show it in a tabbed or floating window.

No!

What you say is true for interlinear products. They are standalone resources and can be shown in tabs or floating windows.

But a reverse-interlinear is specific to a particular translation and so appears only within a panel containing that resource.

.then it give me the thinking??  that I'm loosing resources some how...

I don't see that's the case.

If you buy an interlinear then it is a resource that appears in your library and can be opened like other resources.

If you buy a reverse-interlinear, it does not show as a separate product in your Library - but can be accessed within the associated translation or can be used within a search of that resource.

Does that help at all?

My Reverse Interlinear that I had in WordSearch and could open in a separate tab... is now "mushed" into my Bible....

I don't know anything about what was involved in transferring Reverse Interlinears from Wordsearch to Logos but I expect the RI you access in Bibles in Logos are the "standard" Logos ones as opposed to one transferred from Wordsearch.

And I'm intrigued - was there particular value in having the RI separate? Having always had them integrated, I find that useful as it enables tight linkage between them.

Just the idea of working one way and that becominng your standard. It was the standard I had in WordSearch... 

Fair enough - I get that, thanks