What about the graphical query?
Comments
-
HaroldAKime said:
Concerning my OpenText search, I created it in Logos 3.0 but did not save it. So, I tried to recreate it in Logos 4.0 (below). It returns 66 items but they are not correct. It seems that I need to have both components coming off of Clause1 but I cannot get the second component to link with Clause1.
Yes, bot components need to be coming off Clause 1. As for other problems with false hits, you're also going to need to add:
Clause Component
Clause Category = Predicator -- NOT PRESENTif you want to specify to the database that you want verbless clauses.
With those adjustments, I get 69 hits -- they all look okay. I'd be curious about the difference between the two search results...
Here's what I did:
Clause --> Clause Component
Clause Category = Verb NOT PRESENT
--> Clause Component --> Word Group --> Head Term --> Word (Adjective, Nominative)
Clause Category = Complement
--> Clause Component -->Word Group --> Head Term --> Word (Noun, Nominative)
Clause Category = Subject
HaroldAKime said:Also, can do the following with Morph or Syntax searches I as I did in the GQE?
- quickly paste a list of Lemma for a search
- share my searches (not just picture of them) with my students
I'm not sure. It's not something I've tried to do. I don't think there's a way to quickly paste a list of Lemma, but in the most recent Beta version, we're testing a feature that very nicely will sort by Lemma (or just about anything else you can think of). It's incredibly handy and I am really excited about it.
As for sharing searches, I don't know. My guess is "No" because of the new system for managing files is less transparent, but I haven't fiddled with it at all, so I really can't say for sure.
0 -
Really need a better search interface than the text-entry search window. Something similar to the Syntax Search tool, but for straight NA27 morphology/construction searches.
I'm boggled that more people aren't speaking up on this. I guess I'll just keep using BW 6.0 until this is done.
0 -
Paul Gibbs said:
Really need a better search interface than the text-entry search window. Something similar to the Syntax Search tool, but for straight NA27 morphology/construction searches.
I'm boggled that more people aren't speaking up on this. I guess I'll just keep using BW 6.0 until this is done.
There definitely are concerns and you could search the forum to see those threads. I suspect many are still using L3 for morphological searches.
Dave
===Windows 11 & Android 13
0 -
David B Phillips said:
If you have a specific question about how to search for something, post it here!
I'm not very experienced at the morph & graphical queries, but want to learn more so I want to take you up on your offer of help regarding a recent topic I was researching.
I want to search the entire NA27 for "the faith", that is an article followed by the noun where they agree in case and number ( I think all possibilities are singular) while the set can be any case. The article should be say within 2 or 3 words of the noun. (Question: when you say WITHIN 3 words, is that count inclusive of the two words being specified, thus allowing only one intervening word or does that allow 2 intervening words?)
Thanks.
Have a great day,
jmac0 -
Jim said:
I want to search the entire NA27 for "the faith", that is an article followed by the noun where they agree in case and number ( I think all possibilities are singular) while the set can be any case. The article should be say within 2 or 3 words of the noun. (Question: when you say WITHIN 3 words, is that count inclusive of the two words being specified, thus allowing only one intervening word or does that allow 2 intervening words?)
Jim,
This did it for me:
lemma:ὁ@D?S BEFORE 2 words lemma:πίστις@N?S
Morph search in NA27; articles that are singular before two words "pistis" that is also a singular noun.
If you have beta you can sort them in analysis view by case....
what you don't get from this is the "case agreement thing"
You could also do it like this:
lemma:ὁ@DNS BEFORE 2 words lemma:πίστις@NNS (For nominative)
And do it for all of the cases and have a separate passage list for each or put them into a spread sheet...
Robert Pavich
For help go to the Wiki: http://wiki.logos.com/Table_of_Contents__
0 -
Jim said:
(Question: when you say WITHIN 3 words, is that count inclusive of the two words being specified, thus allowing only one intervening word or does that allow 2 intervening words?)
WITHIN 3 Words allows 2 intervening words to exist.
I checked this by running this search with WITHIN 2 and WITHIN 3 and created passage lists for both. I then subtracted the WITHIN 2 results from the WITHIN 3 results and got these results
Hope this helps.
EDIT: I can't remember if you're running the Beta. Passage lists are from the 4.0c Beta if you didn't know that already.
Prov. 15:23
0 -
Jim said:
that is an article followed by the noun where they agree in case and number
In order to specify that there is agreement with case and number, a syntax search can be used:
Word 1 is set to agree with word 2 in both case and number
I get 101 results with this search. The benefit of a syntax search over a simple morphological search in this case is that you can make sure the article is actually governing the noun.
0 -
David B Phillips said:
In order to specify that there is agreement with case and number, a syntax search can be used:
Thank you for your diagram. I tried to duplicate it but could only create Clause 1 after that , I couldn't make anything that matches yours so I'm lost.
Have a great day,
jmac0 -
Jim said:
Thank you for your diagram. I tried to duplicate it but could only create Clause 1 after that , I couldn't make anything that matches yours so I'm lost.
tried to duplicate it too .
Found i needed Opentext.org (as Anderson Forbes is the default)
with default Anderson Forbes (No Clause Component avail.)
with OpenText.org
0 -
steve clark said:
Found i needed Opentext.org (as Anderson Forbes is the default)
with default Anderson Forbes (No Clause Component avail.)
Yes, sorry for failing to mention that [:$]
0 -
Robert Pavich said:
This worked well in L4. Thanks for the example. I tried it in L3 so I could print the results, but it didn't give me any search results there.
I fooled with the syntax search in L4 but it's too much of a mystery for me at this time.
Appended later: I played around with the L3 Syntax search and got it to work using [=D???]BEFORE 2 WORDS [πίστις=N???]. The whole syntax searching is new to me to it took a bit of playing around to get something.
Have a great day,
jmac0 -
David B Phillips said:
Found i needed Opentext.org
I was using the Lexham so when I switched to Opentext.org I did get further. Referring to your diagram, the only part I can't figure out how to duplicate is making Word2 have "part of speech = article".
Have a great day,
jmac0 -
Jim said:
Referring to your diagram, the only part I can't figure out how to duplicate is making Word2 have "part of speech = article".
In order to specifiy what part of speech a word is, do the following:
Click on the word (In this case, Word2)
This will bring up the side bar where you can choose text, lemma, gloss, or morphology. Click the white box under "morhpology" that says "Morph specification". If the white bar isn't there, click the arrow to the left of "Morphology" to make it appear (brown circle).
@ makes the morphology selector appear. Click "Article" as the picture below shows.
Then click the blue circle with the white arrow to confirm your choice.The box will then say "@D" and the syntax search should show "part-of-speech = article"
Let me know if that helps!
0 -
David B Phillips said:
Click the white box under "morhpology"...
OK That did it. My search matched your 101 hits. David thanks for your patience and help. It got me started on a feature I hadn't used before and gave me some useful results.
Now I await the ability to print/capture the search results.
Have a great day,
jmac0 -
Ok...now that Jim has it down...I wonder why I'm not getting 101 hits?
I'm getting 90'something hits.....
hmmm...
Robert Pavich
For help go to the Wiki: http://wiki.logos.com/Table_of_Contents__
0 -
Bob,
Can you post your search?
0 -
David,
Sure, here is a screen shot:
EDITED TO ADD: Whoops! That pesky little "anything" is hidden in there isn't it?
Mystery solved. [:$]
Robert Pavich
For help go to the Wiki: http://wiki.logos.com/Table_of_Contents__
0 -
Robert, you need an "anything" between the Modifier1 and Word1. There can be terms between the article and the word it modifies, you search wouldn't catch those.
EDIT: I see you figured it out on your own as I was posting [:)]
Prov. 15:23
0