BUG: Time Line Confusion
I'm a bit cofused as to why some dates (50-66 AD) are rendered at the left in a different timezone (400-200 BC)?
Comments
-
Those are events that staff at Faithlife believes to have been prophetic ... around the time of Daniel, you might say (they have prophetic interpreters on staff, as luck would have it).
More accurately (smiling), their 'Advanced' Timeline has had problems from its inception, and more so, recently (L10). Yours seems another example.
If you can edit your title at this point, you might precede the title with "BUG:"
0 -
More accurately (smiling), their 'Advanced' Timeline has had problems from its inception, and more so, recently (L10).
Even more accurately, the advanced timeline is a L10 feature which since its inception in alpha testing received insufficient testing because the volunteer testers were concentrating on the concurrent reworking of the search syntax and user interface. Or at least that was true of this beta tester. Not to mention that history has never been a major interest of mine.
Orthodox Bishop Alfeyev: "To be a theologian means to have experience of a personal encounter with God through prayer and worship."; Orthodox proverb: "We know where the Church is, we do not know where it is not."
0 -
Yes, I put 'advanced' in quotes. Next try will be 'Far Advanced' (completely different from Advanced)..
Normally, I'd assume key entry issues, unless the db format is BP (geology).
0 -
I'm a bit cofused as to why some dates (50-66 AD) are rendered at the left in a different timezone (400-200 BC)?
We have a case for this. Thank you!
Ali Pope | Logos Desktop and Mobile Program Manager
0
