BUG: Parallel Gospel Reader Interactive - is this the intended behavior?

MJ. Smith · 2023-04-03T18:14:28+00:00

Is this the intended behavior or a bug? * When I enter an appropriate reference into the reference/navigation box, the reader navigates to the correct position but fails to open/expand the requested reference. I would expect the tool to expand the correct text. * When I enter an inappropriate reference e.g. a John…

MJ. Smith

Is this the intended behavior or a bug?

When I enter an appropriate reference into the reference/navigation box, the reader navigates to the correct position but fails to open/expand the requested reference. I would expect the tool to expand the correct text.
When I enter an inappropriate reference e.g. a John reference for a reference that includes only the synoptic gospels nothing happens - I would expect an error message or the reference/navigation box turning red.

Find more posts tagged with

Desktop App

Comments

This interactive's UI is extremely confusing (borderline unusable) and is in dire need for an overhaul / redesign.

MJ. Smith

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/1253465#Comment_1253465

I had read your thread prior to my testing in which I found these bugs (I think). Do you have concrete suggestions for what is needed to avoid your confusion?

Dave Hooton

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/1253467#Comment_1253467

Do you have concrete suggestions for what is needed to avoid your confusion?

1. The sort order is not apparent. I would expect:

the appropriate references to be highlighted in their default column; or
move the column to the first position; and
indicate the sort column in View.

2. I like the way corresponding selection works, but it fails in some instances:

The similar phrase in Mt 10:17-18 selects a phrase in Lk 21:12.

3. I like that it makes good use of panel width when a column is deselected and how it aligns the sorted references to other columns.

MJ. Smith

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/1253610#Comment_1253610

. The sort order is not apparent

This one caught me by surprise as I never use the sort option which means I always see the titles which make the sequence obvious.