ChatGPT INTEGRATION PLEASE🔥🔥🔥

What is Faithlife’s stance on users creating embeddings from Logos resources for personal use?

John Bowling said:

(Btw, I think some of the mistakes people experienced could have been avoided by a simple prompt to avoid giving a response if chatGPT doesn't know - the documentation examples refer to this as "preventing hallucination". Just append something like "Answering to the best of your ability, and saying 'I don't know if you don't know'..." - I specifically tried this with your turtles example, Rosie, and chatGPT just said "I don't know" instead of "hallucinating." But this isn't guaranteed to work or to keep it from thinking it knows something based on its training data that it doesn't know.)

Thanks. That's helpful!

Brandon Early said:

Factbook is nice. But if you could somehow introduce and integrate Open AI ChatGPT in to Logos. 
I would love it if Logos better understood the resources I own and become better at answering questions based on the resources I own. 

This would be INCREDIBLY valuable for the user. 
AND become a BIG reason to purchase more resources. 

Oh, how this will make me lazy!

It should be kept in mind that chatGPT’s information about itself or its API is no more accurate than in regards to other areas. The only exception being when you run into the more hardcoded responses like “As a large language model…”.  You can’t currently fine-tune the model that goes by chatGPT. They only just made it available in the API over the last week (gpt-3.5-turbo and gpt-3.5-turbo-0301). You can’t even fine-tune the ”last gen”(?) models like text-davinci-003. And the fine-tunable models were trained differently than chatGPT. The results are often significantly worse. 

I took some time to put together some very high quality data of about 300 prompt/completion pairs and conditional generation samples. The documentation optimistically claims you might see useful results with ~500 examples. In my case, I got nothing useful out of it the fine-tuned model is still significantly worse than just vanilla gpt-3.5-turbo. The good news is gpt-3.5-turbo is cheap and they’ve said they will allow fine-tuning eventually (iirc).

I’m still working on a tool that might make it easier for users to make embeddings and but its still going to be a couple more weeks probably. I still haven’t had a chance to really look at Logos links… so I may just hit a roadblock there too.

I am a student which uses ChatGPT to create my programs. Although I know ChatGPT gives nonsensical answers given it has a wide area of information, I hope that this will be different in the Bible. This because it basically is one central text which is expounded upon over and over. If I understand it correctly, it will try to create a consistent base and move changes more outward. 

When this understanding is correct, training it to understand the Hebrew bible and later on on bible translations and patterns, it will modify its core to create a pattern of the Bible itself. It basically will create a tagging system like logos already has, but unfortunately it's hidden within the model itself and so not accessible. With this in place, adding commentaries expounding the bible would build upon this core and link it to topics outside of the bible. This means that questions about the Bible itself would be at the inner core and would have been heavily established. They will therefor highly likely be answered correctly. Surrounding questions might be less correct.

When commentaries would be added that make no sense and contradict the majority of commentaries, the content will most likely be ignored. So, I think that if Logos Bible software uses chatGPT, it would be the example of using chatGPT correctly.

re: tieskeda,

The field of biblical scholarship does not speak with a unified voice on most issues Christians probably care deeply about. That, and the fact that a diversity of voices/opinions are inherent to Large Language Models (LLMs) like ChatGPT.

re: abond,

Bing has done a decent job of getting it to cite sources (it's using GPT 4, which is now in preview for ChatGPT). But of course the ChatGPT you find on OpenAI's website can't, because it's trying to predict text with no base. It can only try to predict what should follow your prompt.

JH said:

This is a fast moving train - there are open source alternatives now being proposed that allow folks to personalize and train their own models.

https://www.reuters.com/technology/databricks-pushes-open-source-chatbot-cheaper-chatgpt-alternative-2023-03-24/

Interesting, I hadn't seen this one. But it looks like it still wants you to pay for cloud computing. There are a couple others that allow you to run everything locally (OpenChatKit). But so far none of them have come close to the quality of GPT-3.5, let alone GPT 4. 

Here is OpenChatKit and GPT-4 answers to the following prompt:

"Explain Augustine's view on the antipodes."

OpenChatKit

[quote]Augustine believed that the antipodes were inhabited by people who were different from us in both appearance and behavior. He believed that the antipodes were a place where people lived who were different from us in both appearance and behavior. He believed that the antipodes were a place where people lived who were different from us in both appearance and behavior.

GPT-4 

[quote]St. Augustine of Hippo (354-430 AD) was an early Christian theologian and philosopher whose writings significantly influenced the development of Western Christianity and philosophy. Among his many works, one relevant to the topic of the antipodes is his book "De Civitate Dei" (The City of God). In this work, Augustine discusses various topics related to Christianity and its relationship with the world.

In the context of geography, "antipodes" refers to the idea of people or lands on the direct opposite side of the Earth, essentially referring to the idea that the Earth is a sphere and that there are inhabited lands on the opposite side of the known world. The term has its roots in Greek language, where "anti" means opposite and "podes" means feet.

Augustine's view on the antipodes was skeptical. He did not outright deny the possibility of their existence, but he believed that if such lands existed, they could not be inhabited by humans. This view was primarily based on his interpretation of the Bible. According to Augustine, the descendants of Adam and Eve, who were the first humans created by God, could not have reached the antipodes because of the vastness of the ocean that separates them from the known world. Augustine argued that humans could not have been created separately on the other side of the Earth, as it would contradict the Biblical account of human origins.

It is important to note that Augustine's view on the antipodes was a reflection of the limited knowledge of geography at that time. His skepticism was shared by many thinkers of his era, who could not imagine how humans could traverse such vast distances, especially across the ocean, to populate these distant lands. However, with the progress of science, the discovery of new lands, and the understanding of the Earth as a sphere, it became clear that Augustine's view on the antipodes was not accurate, as there are indeed inhabited lands on the opposite side of the Earth, such as Australia and New Zealand.

OpenChatKit's response is similar to results I got from fine-tuning gpt model Davinci, which is probably worse than just vanilla Davinci. I haven't had a chance to try fine-tuning OpenChatKit yet, but considering that you're starting from such a low base and the amount of effort it requires, it's probably still wiser to just wait till OpenAI allows fine-tuning higher models, or using embeddings, or waiting in general for the tech in general to improve.

I asked “Describe Toxic Behavior” and it gave me information that’s very similar to a book that’s currently in prepub 👍😃👌 Below is the ChatGPT article and here’s the link to the book: https://www.logos.com/product/248255/how-to-deal-with-toxic-people 

Toxic behavior refers to actions, attitudes, and habits that are harmful or damaging to others, often with the intention of exerting power or control. It can take many forms and can be exhibited by individuals, groups, or entire cultures. Some examples of toxic behavior include:

1. Verbal abuse: This includes yelling, name-calling, belittling, and insulting others. It can be used to manipulate or control others and can cause significant emotional harm.

2. Gaslighting: Gaslighting is a form of emotional abuse that involves manipulating someone into questioning their own perceptions, memories, and sanity. It can be used to make someone doubt themselves or feel crazy.

3. Manipulation: Manipulation involves using tactics such as guilt-tripping, playing the victim, or using emotional blackmail to get what one wants. It can be used to control others and can be very harmful.

4. Intimidation: Intimidation involves using threats or physical force to get what one wants. It can be used to control others and can be very harmful.

5. Passive-aggressiveness: Passive-aggressive behavior involves indirectly expressing anger or frustration, often through sarcasm or subtle insults. It can be used to manipulate others and can cause significant emotional harm.

Overall, toxic behavior is characterized by a lack of empathy and concern for others and a desire to exert power or control over others. It can be very damaging to individuals and communities and should be addressed and confronted when it occurs.

xnman said:

DAL said:

I asked “Describe Toxic Behavior” and it gave me information that’s very similar to a book that’s currently in prepub 👍😃👌 Below is the ChatGPT article and here’s the link to the book: https://www.logos.com/product/248255/how-to-deal-with-toxic-people 

Toxic behavior refers to actions, attitudes, and habits that are harmful or damaging to others, often with the intention of exerting power or control. It can take many forms and can be exhibited by individuals, groups, or entire cultures. Some examples of toxic behavior include:

1. Verbal abuse: This includes yelling, name-calling, belittling, and insulting others. It can be used to manipulate or control others and can cause significant emotional harm.

2. Gaslighting: Gaslighting is a form of emotional abuse that involves manipulating someone into questioning their own perceptions, memories, and sanity. It can be used to make someone doubt themselves or feel crazy.

3. Manipulation: Manipulation involves using tactics such as guilt-tripping, playing the victim, or using emotional blackmail to get what one wants. It can be used to control others and can be very harmful.

4. Intimidation: Intimidation involves using threats or physical force to get what one wants. It can be used to control others and can be very harmful.

5. Passive-aggressiveness: Passive-aggressive behavior involves indirectly expressing anger or frustration, often through sarcasm or subtle insults. It can be used to manipulate others and can cause significant emotional harm.

Overall, toxic behavior is characterized by a lack of empathy and concern for others and a desire to exert power or control over others. It can be very damaging to individuals and communities and should be addressed and confronted when it occurs.

HELP!!! I THINK I AM MARRIED TO THAT PERSON!!!!  lol 

If you really think you are, it's not funny, and reaching out for help in an online forum is not likely to get you the help you need. Reach out to trusted local friends or pastor our counselor.

And if you are just joking, that's not funny either. Many people really are in relationships like this, and it can be scary and hard to get out. Of course the ideal should be to get help for the abusive person to change if one really did and does still love them, but I wouldn't keep myself in danger while that hopeful change is being worked on. Unfortunately many pastors/churches give advice contrary to this, forcing the abused person to forgive repeatedly and stay with the abuser, virtually ensuring a repeated cycle which can end tragically.

I have a question about ChatGPT, will it be Calvinistic Covenantal or Arminian Dispensational & What about eschatology...[:O]