Note to Progressive Christians ...

To those that answered my question.... Thank you!

Another small step to vote for which seems minor but it moves Faithlife's coding away from Bible as history/linguistic puzzle to Bible as literature with universal themes.  Please vote for Motif oriented All the <name> in the Bible literary and archetypal topics | Faithlife

Some existing requests to support:

• Set pattern for denominational package value added | Faithlife of importance primarily by the recognition of denominational needs.
• SUGGESTION: Useful book on influence of non-canonical texts | Faithlife shows that para-biblical texts had/have a continuing influence in the church outside 2-4th centuries.
• passage slides need multiple passage textboxes | Faithlife for multicultural congregations of any ilk
• Additional denominational coding/ sort in Passage Guide | Faithlife absolutely essential support for the churches that use liturgical books and/or lectionaries

Please encourage your Logos using friends to vote even if they are never on the forums and can't find the feedback site. Remind them that silence will not nudge Logos to more closely meet their needs.

Please read SUGGESTION: Application/Actualization/tropological sense - Logos Forums then vote and add your improvements on my suggestion. I am not letting the issues of Logos/Verbum support for more liberal view fade away.

Joel Osteen

Belated response. I don't consider Osteen liberal/progressive. I'd put him in the prosperity gospel camp, which is pretty different from what most liberal/progressive theologians teach about wealth & poverty. Wikipedia categorizes him as Word of Faith, a subset of Charismatic Christianity. He attended Oral Roberts University, which is also categorized that way, and as evangelical.

Joel Osteen

Belated response. I don't consider Osteen liberal/progressive. I'd put him in the prosperity gospel camp, which is pretty different from what most liberal/progressive theologians teach about wealth & poverty. Wikipedia categorizes him as Word of Faith, a subset of Charismatic Christianity. He attended Oral Roberts University, which is also categorized that way, and as evangelical.

Agreed. Progressives are normally critical of the prosperity gospel and Osteen is the poster child of that camp.

Thank you Rosie ... this is the way to convince Faithlife there is a market for these titles.

I'll believe it when I see it. I'm predicting no more than 3 votes on any of those. That wouldn't be enough to convince Faithlife.

Just to chime in with another voice in this thread: thank you so much, Rosie, for compiling these lists. I have voted for some (by far not all!) and you are right, two to three votes is a low score and there needs to be more activity. People not considering themselves "progressive" should read from those author's and vote for their availability. It seems that some of your suggestions have been deleted in the meantime?

I also took the opportunity to buy a couple of existing resources (putting money where my mouth is or so - maybe Faithlife is more convinced by dollars than votes), I think it was from Brad Jersak and Pete Enns. I also preordered another from Scot McNight, even if I own quite a lot by this author (noting that am not really sure if he's correctly classified in the progressive camp or is just a non-fundamentalist evangelical). 

Just to chime in with another voice in this thread: thank you so much, Rosie, for compiling these lists....  It seems that some of your suggestions have been deleted in the meantime?

Are you finding broken links on some of them when you click? Or are you just not finding many of my suggestions when you go to the book suggestions board? If I sort my own suggestions in order of most recent, I'm seeing lots. So I don't get the impression any have been deleted. But let me know if you got a broken link.

Are you finding broken links on some of them when you click? Or are you just not finding many of my suggestions when you go to the book suggestions board? If I sort my own suggestions in order of most recent, I'm seeing lots. So I don't get the impression any have been deleted. But let me know if you got a broken link.

 

I used your links, got about two broken ones but didn't save screenshots or such. Right now trying to find those again I see that the request for RHE's https://feedback.faithlife.com/boards/logos-desktop-app/posts/wholehearted-faith gives an "idea not found"-error message.

I used your links, got about two broken ones but didn't save screenshots or such. Right now trying to find those again I see that the request for RHE's https://feedback.faithlife.com/boards/logos-desktop-app/posts/wholehearted-faith gives an "idea not found"-error message.

Ah, I see what went wrong. That should be https://feedback.faithlife.com/boards/logos-book-requests/posts/wholehearted-faith.

I had accidentally posted that one and one other onto the Desktop App board and then moved them, but had already pasted the (wrong) link into my forum post. I've just fixed those two. The other one was: 

• Rivers from Eden: 40 Days of Intimate Conversation with God

Yes, that was it - thanks again!

Why would one want to be liberal or progressive? Isn't the bible good enough?

Because they are not regenerated, it is pretty simple as I look over these threads for the last several months, sad state of affairs when you start getting to far away from the actual scriptures you go from Spirit led into the flesh of man.

One of the reasons after 20 plus years, I am spending with the other guys now.

Why would one want to be liberal or progressive? Isn't the bible good enough?

Because they are not regenerated, it is pretty simple as I look over these threads for the last several months, sad state of affairs when you start getting to far away from the actual scriptures you go from Spirit led into the flesh of man.

One of the reasons after 20 plus years, I am spending with the other guys now.

You all are NOT going to take my thread off topic. Liberal or progressive are simply words used to refer to a constellation of theological beliefs. It is inappropriate to assume that they go beyond the Bible -- the terms refer to the emphasis of the Bible passages they believe our age needs to hear. It is equally inappropriate to assume that they are not regenerated or getting away from actual scripture. Please, if you wish to post in this thread, stick to the actual topic, stick to the guidelines, and don't drive the OP (me) nuts with false assumptions. Please, however, vote for the various features and resources mentioned throughout the thread. Improving Logos helps all of us.

You all are NOT going to take my thread off topic. Liberal or progressive are simply words used to refer to a constellation of theological beliefs.

aaaah!!! Now I understand..... Some people have a right to their own threads.... and all this time, I thought it was Logos who owned the threads...

Just because I'm a slow learner.... doen't mean I don't learn... it's just that sometimes I wonder what I am learning.... [8-|]

To be fair, it is MJ's thread in the sense that she started the thread, and she has also gone to great lengths to make sure that the thread stays within forum guidelines.

Why would one want to be liberal or progressive? Isn't the bible good enough?

It maybe in how one interprets the Bible. 

Some people have a right to their own threads.

No, but when one starts a thread on what is to many a controversial subject, the guideline of "Please help others follow these guidelines" takes on more significance. I've had too many threads hijacked by nasty arguments irrelevant to the original question that I get a bit paranoid when people try to turn the thread into theological evaluations.

MJ.... You have been very helpful to me in my learning of Logos. Please understand that I appreciate you for this. You have answered a lot of my questions.

I did not try to hijack the thread you started and I apologize to you if my aggressiveness came across that way. I did not mean for that to happen, and I ask you with all my heart to forgive me for any indication to the otherwise. In my mind, I was asking what I thought to be a good question for the thought of the thread...I assure you of that.

I am sure I can look back at the threads I've started and say for some of them, "I didn't want it to go that way". I think that happens to a lot of people using Logos forums. I've taken it to be that is the way on Logos Forums.

I want to be friends with you. It's just that sometimes your remarks seem to be ones that push my buttons whether you meant to or not. 

l will try harder. 

I did not try to hijack the thread you started and I apologize to you if my aggressiveness came across that way.

Apology accepted. I also apologize for my frequently misunderstanding of your intentions. Unfortunately, your posts sometimes follow the pattern of people who in the past have become very problematic in the forums -- to the point of having their access revoked for various periods of time. I keep forgetting that you are new enough to the forums that you are not familiar with their problematic posts. In this case

Why would one want to be liberal or progressive? Isn't the bible good enough?

The "isn't the bible good enough?" came across to me as a dig against liberal or progressive Christians -- there is no reason to assume liberal or progressive Christians are less dedicated to the Bible as you, especially when the post indicated that you didn't know the liberal and progressive positions. And "why would one want to be" comes across to me as belittling their position where "what are liberal or progressive positions" does not.

While others were not pulled off topic by your comment, I let it pass. However, when the response

Because they are not regenerated, it is pretty simple as I look over these threads for the last several months, sad state of affairs when you start getting to far away from the actual scriptures you go from Spirit led into the flesh of man.

was posted your response was no longer benign - it was used to accuse the liberals and progressive of being (a) unregenerated, (b) too far from Scripture and (c) led away from the Spirit into the flesh of man. That post should not be acceptable to any in the forums.

My father was very influential in my response to this sort of thing. He was very opinionated and loved to debate. A friend of mine was very surprised watching Dad with his grandchildren (7 and 9) at a total solar eclipse. He would genuinely listen to their inventions and explanations then gently point out one or two flaws they might want to think about.  They would come up with modifications and the cycle would repeat. As a Church of Christ elder, he taught me that I don't really understand what I believe until I know why I don't believe other possible positions. For example, I don't subscribe to sola scriptura because I don't subscribe to the cessation of charismatic gifts and apostolic tradition's authority. My father subscribed to sola scriptura because as a cessationist he had few other rational options. If we were to debate narrowly on the topic of sola scriptura we would have quickly come to the end of our actual knowledge and started responding by getting frustrated and resorting to calling the other position names. Rather, we debated until we realized that each position pro/con sola scriptura was a reasonable belief based on the constraints of our position on cessationism. Both of us had a better understanding of what we believed and why and a better understanding of why others believed differently. So we began to discuss cessationism only to learn (through many intermediate steps) that we had rather different world views and understanding of human experience. He was born in 1912 and, like my maternal grandfather, expected science to solve all problems. I was born 19nn and, like many of my hippy generation, expected a well-formed mind (Buddhist, mystical Christianity, Kabbalah ...) to solve the world problems. Luckily, he lived to be 98 and still of sound mind so we made progress in understanding each other or at least finding a common vocabulary in which we could debate issues. So, yes, that is a very long-winded answer which should help you understand what I understand by the guideline 

Please treat each other with the love, courtesy, respect, and kindness that you would if you were sitting in your living room together.

I think of my living room as my father and I at the dinner table or I in the passenger seat (and Mother getting annoyed because she hated debates)

While others were not pulled off topic by your comment, I let it pass. However, when the response

Because they are not regenerated, it is pretty simple as I look over these threads for the last several months, sad state of affairs when you start getting to far away from the actual scriptures you go from Spirit led into the flesh of man.

was posted your response was no longer benign - it was used to accuse the liberals and progressive of being (a) unregenerated, (b) too far from Scripture and (c) led away from the Spirit into the flesh of man. That post should not be acceptable to any in the forums.

Not responsible for what others post or posted.... Some people look at what someone says through their own feelings and not as what the person meant when they said it. This is nothing but wrong. It is unloving, unkind and ungodly.  I am very glad God does not do such things.

Enough said.

Not responsible for what others post or posted.... 

A perfect example of how different our basic assumptions are. If I yell "fire", I bear some responsibility for the resulting actions; the same is true of provocative statements in a forum although at a lower level. 

Not responsible for what others post or posted.... 

A perfect example of how different our basic assumptions are. If I yell "fire", I bear some responsibility for the resulting actions; the same is true of provocative statements in a forum although at a lower level. 

I think part of the issue is that many (most? certainly some - xnman and I for instance) of us are where we are because of deeply held convictions that we have arrived at after careful study. Some of us after years of private study, some of us after years of formal education, some of us after years and years of both. 

Which creates a hesitancy about other positions outside the ones we have dearly fought for and hard earned. I think then despite how generous and respectful we try to be our bias(es) is/are deeply held and to a point so deep we aren't aware they are affecting us. My own post included. I am not nor have I ever been catholic. I do have family that are/were, and I am aware of what the protestant academy teaches about the catholic position(s). But that isn't the same as understanding and being a part of those streams of thought now, and so bias slips through. 

Plus I think especially newer forum members assume that everyone is in the same school of thought as they are, and takes the authority they hold to as seriously or loosely as they do. 

I have no issue being friends with people who identify as progressive, even though I couldn't be confused for one. I've welcomed such people into my church in the past and would gladly do so again. So long as they can handle me preaching something else than what they are acclimated to.... 

I guess my last question is, are there many that would self identify that way? 

It may be that I just run in the wrong circles, but most of the progressives and liberals (given the definitions posted earlier in the thread) that I know wouldn't consider themselves to be that. 

You might have more luck pushing for one thing at a time. See how cool this new feature could be? Do you love the work of (scholars name here)? He's the pre-eminent (something or other) in (field). Vote for him at this link: user voice/Feedbear (or whatever it's called these days). 

You might find more people that love those previously mentioned authors that way, and perhaps less controversy surrounding labels. Or perhaps more drama like we had surrounding Bram stokers Dracula or Faithlife dating. 

Also, my other point of exposure to Catholic thought is on social media where I see a fair bit that I suspect is imaginative at best. I'll refrain from posting an example I saw yesterday, that likely had someones priest shaking their head.

Protestants do the same thing sometimes though, and I'm left shaking my head.

Very good post, abondservant.

I guess my last question is, are there many that would self identify that way? 

I really don't know. Most people I know that are ELCA, UCC, and Anglican/Episcopal would consider themselves progressives if they know the term otherwise liberal. I also know Unitarians, Methodists, Mennonites, and Catholics who claim or at least lean towards progressive theology. So I would expect there to be a large number of users who identify as progressive. But I would expect that as a percentage of users is greater than as a percentage of forumites. The only statistic I have been able to find is that Americans are 19% progressive Christians - but the figure is more than a decade old.

What would truly be success for me is to get someone who identifies as progressive to spearhead feature and resource requests for their needs, someone who gains enough of a following to ensure several votes for their proposals. I have my own tilting at windmills role representing the Oriental Orthodox, Eastern Rite Catholics, liturgy-hugging, traditional Bible study methods interests.

my other point of exposure to Catholic thought is on social media where I see a fair bit that I suspect is imaginative at best.

What I have seen on social media posing as Catholic thought is more American than Catholic even from the hierarchy. I am rather embarrassed by most of it.

I support the widest range of resources being made available in Logos. My views are my own; however, besides what one thinks is right or true or appropriate to be in their Bible software, I have to ask a simple question: how can you (that is, anyone) refute stuff you think is wrong if you've never read it or it is unavailable to you? Coming from an academic background, I have read plenty of authors I would never recommend to my students, but I needed to be conversant with them. I just can't say, "Bible Teacher X said Y is bad, so stay away from them!" We need these primary resources available, pro or con.

Forget (for this post) progressive Christian writings; there is a horrible gaping hole in Faithlife's catalogue in that we have almost nothing by Bultmann. Some will flinch away at the very mention of his name, but he is referenced in nearly every book of NT studies (and quite a bit beyond) that has been put out since the mid-20C. Good or bad, there's no questioning his influence, but there's no way to study him in his own words in Logos. Similarly, while few if any of the authors mentioned in this thread are likely to rise to his level of influence and importance--well, who knows unless you get a chance to read them?

there is a horrible gaping hole in Faithlife's catalogue in that we have almost nothing by Bultmann.

I suspect I'm human; I had to first check my library (1 Bultmann).  And then I checked Logos.com (1 Bultmann).  As far as I can see anyway.  Isn't that interesting.  I also didn't know he did the Johnnine Epistles for Hermeneia.

But I can see how 'Progressive' in the title sparks life into folks.  And I'll be the first to admit, coming into Logosia, I had no idea what Catholics thought (except for our not-a-demomination's labels).  Now, there's 'Progressives', and I'm again lost.  I've been watching and really not making too much progress.  Being a 1700s literalist (how's that), I'm far to their? 'left' (most of conservatism is just late 2nd-century doctrines).

So, this thread is quite educational. Bultmann.  Huh.

I suspect I'm human; I had to first check my library (1 Bultmann).  And then I checked Logos.com (1 Bultmann).  As far as I can see anyway.  Isn't that interesting.  I also didn't know he did the Johnnine Epistles for Hermeneia.

Meanwhile, a quick search in my library for "Kerygma and Myth" yielded 339 hits in 130 resources for that title alone, but there's no way to study it in Logos.

Great point on interacting with some of these authors within the Logos Software.

I support the widest range of resources being made available in Logos. 

Whole heartedly agree. Sometimes the people we disagree with the most, still have interesting questions that ought to be at least thought through. 

A young man I knew when he was in middle school who went to a hypercalvinistic baptistic church at the time, is now an arminian fourth wave pentecostal youth pastor in the Anglican Church. Which was and is a combination that surprised me (though I love and respect the anglicans who supported me heavily in the missions work I've done over the years, and Church of England folks that spearheaded a number of initiatives in UK that I was blessed to be able to participate in). 

Regardless, he more or less accused me of not fully adhering to my own position with a question that it took a minute to think through (before circular filing). 

It's worth while to know your opposition enough to be able to make them do some soul searching with a single question. 

At the end of the day, thanks to Logos, I did some studying and learned where his thinking went sideways, pointed that out, and he spent a few days soul searching. A few months at this point. At the end of the day, I didn't have to like, or agree with my friends conclusions to be sharpened by my brother in Christ. 

there is a horrible gaping hole in Faithlife's catalogue in that we have almost nothing by Bultmann.

I looked on Feedbear and there was only one request for anything by Bultmann. Worth voting for:

Theology of the New Testament, Bultmann

In the meantime, I've added a couple of others:

Kerygma and Myth: A Theological Debate

Bultman's views on mythological elements in Christianity, followed by five critical essays by H. Thielicke, A. Farrer, and others.

New Testament & Mythology and Other Writings

Aside from the fact that it is perhaps the single most discussed and controversial theological writing of the century, no one knowledgeable of Bultmann's work could doubt its basic importance for his entire contribution. Although the position is for which it argues was hardly new, having already taken shape in several of his theological essays written during the 1920s, it is nevertheless the classic formulation of this position and as such incomparable in the Bultmann corpus.

there is a horrible gaping hole in Faithlife's catalogue in that we have almost nothing by Bultmann.

Growing up in a very small-town, rural environment, I got my early "theological" training from Time magazine: the names I learned:

• Paul Tillich
• Martin Buber
• Rudolf Bultman
• Alan Watts
• John A.T. Robinson
• John Shelby Spong
• Thomas Merton
• Dag Hammarskjöld
• Dietrich Bonhoeffer

I've always been a bit surprised at how lightly Logos covers what I think of as the theologians known "culturally". I consider them (and the ones added over the years) to be essential for apologetics and polemics.

Years ago, I spent time in a blue collar, rural community in Ohio. I was surprised to find Bultmann's Jesus Christ and Mythology at the local library's donor-supplied used book sale. Since I paid 25 cents for it, I'll vote for Rosie's suggestions. I'm also surprised his commentary on John is missing in the Logos store. (I wouldn't vote for it since I've exhausted my interest in his approach.) Most of his stuff shows its age, but so do many of the things in my library. And clothes closet, too, I suppose.

I'm also surprised his commentary on John is missing in the Logos store.

Oh, I forgot to add a request for that one. I mistakenly thought that the Hermeneia volume by him was the Gospel of John, but it's the Johannine Epistles (that's the only book by Bultmann that is currently in the Logos store).

So here's a new request:

The Gospel of John: A Commentary

Growing up in a very small-town, rural environment, I got my early "theological" training from Time magazine: the names I learned:

• Paul Tillich
• Martin Buber
• Rudolf Bultman
• Alan Watts
• John A.T. Robinson
• John Shelby Spong
• Thomas Merton
• Dag Hammarskjöld
• Dietrich Bonhoeffer

I've always been a bit surprised at how lightly Logos covers what I think of as the theologians known "culturally". I consider them (and the ones added over the years) to be essential for apologetics and polemics.

The mid-20C was filled with these remarkable "giants" of the theological scene who were so influential that the mainstream secular press like Time covered them. The winds of culture have changed, of course, but we have few, if any, figures today who are so dominating despite the significance of their work. We need them in Logos. There are, of course, publishing/economic factors that would determine whether they would ever make it into the catalogue--I'm sure FL could sell plenty of Bultmann to make it worthwhile; someone like Spong less so--but I would hope that they would not be barred simply because of their viewpoint. We don't need to have everyone, but it is simply wrong to think that Logos is sufficient for academic-level study of, say, the New Testament with Bultmann's absence.

EDIT: And from Catholic theologians, we need Schillebeeckx, Rahner, Küng, Kasper, and others. We have some books about them but very few by them. I am happy, though, that there is a decent amount of von Balthasar in the catalogue.

Growing up in a very small-town, rural environment, I got my early "theological" training from Time magazine: the names I learned:

• Paul Tillich
• Martin Buber
• Rudolf Bultman
• Alan Watts
• John A.T. Robinson
• John Shelby Spong
• Thomas Merton
• Dag Hammarskjöld
• Dietrich Bonhoeffer

I've always been a bit surprised at how lightly Logos covers what I think of as the theologians known "culturally". I consider them (and the ones added over the years) to be essential for apologetics and polemics.

Others that I'd put in that same category as known culturally include Karl Barth (of whom Logos has a lot, though I'm still waiting for Dogmatics in Outline), and Reinhold Niebuhr, of whom there are several suggestions on Feedbear:

Christ and Culture

Faith and History - A Comparison of Christian and Modern Views of History

Moral Man and Immoral Society

The Children of Light and the Children of Darkness: A Vindication of Democracy and a Critique of Its Traditional Defense

Discerning the Signs of the Times - Sermons for Today and Tomorrow

This proposal moves towards making prayer books and collections of prayer usable within Logos/Verbum. This will help move the prayer list away from its petitionary focus and one answer = done with that topic mentality.

SUGGESTION: Add dynamic text/links to prayer list - Logos Forums

Rosie and MJ, 

Thank you for compiling these lists and offering suggestions for more progressive resources. I wish I could be the "spearhead" for getting features and resource requests into Logos, but I just don't have the time (as you can tell by me responding to a post almost 3 weeks later!). I'm going through and upvoting all of them! I'm in a similar boat to Rosie, though - I've given up on Logos carrying progressive titles, but I do always check here before buying elsewhere.

I appreciate abondservant's and Sean's posts and am grateful to have those types of discussions here. 

Richard Rohr 'And' is on pre-pub.

Another progressive resource I'd love to see in Logos is The Christian Century (magazine). It calls itself Thoughtful / Independent / Progressive. Its website says, "Since 1900, the Christian Century has published reporting, commentary, poetry, and essays on the role of faith in a pluralistic society." Its About page says, "For decades, the Christian Century has informed and shaped progressive, mainline Christianity. Committed to thinking critically and living faithfully, the magazine explores what it means to believe and live out the Christian faith in our time. As a voice of generous orthodoxy, the Century is both loyal to the church and open to the world."

This was an excellent recent article that gets at what I think of as progressive Christianity. I give its main points here below for the TL;DR version.

Deconstructed, reimagined faith by Peter Choi

Five ways I see a new generation reorienting its Christianity

1. From triumphalism to lament.

2. From morality to dignity.

3. From certainty to mystery.

4. From superiority to mutuality.

5. From rhetoric to embodiment.

This article was making the rounds among my progressive Christian friends on Facebook recently.

Writers published by the Century over its long history include Martin E. Marty, James M. Wall, Jane Addams, Albert Schweitzer, W. E. B. DuBois, Reuben Markham, C. S. Lewis, W. H. Auden, T. S. Eliot, Reinhold Niebuhr, Richard John Neuhaus, Paul Tillich, John F. Kennedy, Dwight D. Eisenhower, Thomas Merton, James Cone, Rosemary Rutherford, Mary Daly, Billy Graham, Wendell Berry, Henri Nouwen, N. T. Wright, Delores S. Williams, Sarah Coakley, Rowan Williams, and Marilynne Robinson.

I've added a request for it to be voted for here:

The Christian Century (magazine)

Consider voting for some of these projects in support of those who think of scripture in terms of pericopes rather than chapter and verse. Suggestion to improve/expand the usefulness of Logos/Verbum pericope functions - Logos Forums

And clothes closet, too, I suppose.

I have noticed if I put clothes in the closet for a long time, they shrink.

Does that happen with theological resources too? [H]

Does that happen with theological resources too?

As I hi-lite them, then reread them, my best resources gain the weight of additional wisdom. 

Definitely going that direction.  Eisegesis Maximus.

I've added four of R. S. Sugirtharajah's works to FeedBear - I'd love all of his work but these are ones I deem most likely to gain support.  Remember to vote for Rosie's authors as well. We have to show a demand.

Postcolonial Criticism and Biblical Interpretation by R. S. Sugirtharajah | Logos

Jesus in Asia by R. S. Sugirtharajah | Logos

SCM Dictionary of Third World Theologies | Logos

An Asian Introduction to the New Testament | Logos

Continuation of my previous three posts (part 1 and part 2 and part 3) with links to Feedbear requests:

Beth Allison Barr:

• Available:
• The Making of Biblical Womanhood: How the Subjugation of Women Became Gospel Truth
• Jesus through Medieval Eyes: Beholding Christ with the Artists, Mystics, and Theologians of the Middle Ages (pre-pub, appears to be US only)

• New requests:
• The Acts of the Apostles: Four Centuries of Baptist Interpretation (co-edited with others)
• The Pastoral Care of Women in Late Medieval England (Gender in the Middle Ages, Volume 3)
• Faith and History: A Devotional (co-edited with Christopher Gehrz)

Kristin Kobes Du Mez:

• New requests
• A New Gospel for Women: Katharine Bushnell and the Challenge of Christian Feminism

• Existing requests:
• Jesus and John Wayne

David P. Gushee:

• Available
• Evangelical Peacemakers: Gospel Engagement in a War-Torn World
• The Sacredness of Human Life: Why an Ancient Biblical Vision Is Key to the World’s Future
• Kingdom Ethics: Following Jesus in Contemporary Context, 2nd ed. (with Glen H. Stassen)
• A Morning and Evening Prayerbook (with Jeanie Gushee, looks like it's US only)
• The Art of Forgiveness (contributed one chapter)
• After Evangelicalism: The Path to a New Christianity (audio only)
• Still Christian: Following Jesus Out of American Evangelicalism (audio only)
• Defending Democracy from Its Christian Enemies (in pre-pub)

• New requests
• After Evangelicalism: The Path to a New Christianity (ebook version; currently only available as audio)
• A Letter to My Anxious Christian Friends: From Fear to Faith in Unsettled Times
• Still Christian: Following Jesus Out of American Evangelicalism
• Introducing Christian Ethics: Core Convictions for Christians Today
• Righteous Gentiles of the Holocaust: Genocide and Moral Obligation
• Moral Leadership for a Divided Age: Fourteen People Who Dared to Change Our World (with Colin Holtz)
• Preparing for Christian Ministry: An Evangelical Approach (co-edited with Walter C. Jackson)
• Justice and the Way of Jesus: Christian Ethics and the Incarnational Discipleship of Glen Stassen (co-edited with Reggie L. Williams)
• Evangelical Ethics: A Reader (Library of Theological Ethics) (co-edited with Isaac B. Sharp)

• Existing requests
• Changing Our Mind: Definitive 3rd Edition of the Landmark Call for Inclusion of LGBTQ Christians with Response to Critics

Continuation of my previous three posts (part 1 and part 2 and part 3) with links to Feedbear requests:

Voted for many of those - and it seems that the link for David Gushee's "Justice and the Way of Jesus" only leads to Amazon, so here's the Feedbear link: https://feedback.logos.com/boards/logos-book-requests/posts/justice-and-the-way-of-jesus-christian-ethics-and-the-incarnational-discipleship-of-glen-stassen 

Voted for many of those - and it seems that the link for David Gushee's "Justice and the Way of Jesus" only leads to Amazon, so here's the Feedbear link: https://feedback.logos.com/boards/logos-book-requests/posts/justice-and-the-way-of-jesus-christian-ethics-and-the-incarnational-discipleship-of-glen-stassen 

Thanks! I fixed the link.

Here's a new resource in pre-pub that looks like it would be of interest to the liberal/progressive folks:

https://www.logos.com/product/259679/the-making-of-american-liberal-theology 

Thanks to Rosie for help keeping this push alive. In response to a survey by Logos, I have posted How could Logos help your sermon-writing process? which includes a progressive Christian concern. Please make sure the liberal and progressive views are represented in the feedback.

Please make sure the liberal and progressive views are represented in the feedback.

I was going to ... your points are good, but surprising (I don't use the sermon tools). I decided to move on; the design (design, design, design) is too brittle.  Mark will likely do a little of this and that.  It's a lot like the work-thing (I don't even remember its name).  My impression over the years, is they have a feature budget, they get near its limit, and then they're done.  A few years later, a little this and that.  I suspect that's now even more their future.