macOS Sonoma 14
Today is the release date. What is the latest regarding LOGOS compatibility? Thank you!
Comments
-
It was answered elsewhere that it is compatible. Welcome to the forums and do return.
Orthodox Bishop Alfeyev: "To be a theologian means to have experience of a personal encounter with God through prayer and worship."; Orthodox proverb: "We know where the Church is, we do not know where it is not."
0 -
Thank you very much MJ. All the best to you!
0 -
Hi, just popping in here to confirm. We have done some internal testing on Sonoma and have had a number of users in the beta forums running Sonoma, and as of 28.1 that we shipped yesterday we don't have any active issues with macOS Sonoma. It should be fully compatible. Have a nice day!
0 -
Excellent. Very good news since I am not sure where I would be without my LOGOS, right? Wish I had purchased this software 20 yrs ago!
0 -
Can confirm, been running the beta and production version of Logos on beta Sonoma, and production Sonoma for a time now without issues.Nick Mueller said:Hi, just popping in here to confirm. We have done some internal testing on Sonoma and have had a number of users in the beta forums running Sonoma, and as of 28.1 that we shipped yesterday we don't have any active issues with macOS Sonoma. It should be fully compatible. Have a nice day!
L2 lvl4 (...) WORDsearch, all the way through L10,
0 -
On Fire highlight is messed up in MacOS Sonoma 14. It is a great effect, but makes highlighted On Fire words hard to read now on the Mac now.
Still looks great on iOS/iPadOS 17.0.2.0 -
Dr. John Wheeler said:
On Fire highlight is messed up in MacOS Sonoma 14. It is a great effect, but makes highlighted On Fire words hard to read now on the Mac now. Still looks great on iOS/iPadOS 17.0.2.
I noticed that, too. It's weird because the sample highlight looks fine:
0 -
Dr. John Wheeler said:
On Fire highlight is messed up in MacOS Sonoma 14. It is a great effect, but makes highlighted On Fire words hard to read now on the Mac now. Still looks great on iOS/iPadOS 17.0.2.
OK, I think I know what's happening. If you change the text size, you should see the proper style appear, but scrolling causes it to become unseemly again (that's such a great word, I think I'll say it again . . . unseemly).
0 -
From what I can tell, the problem is Sonoma's font engine. The fonts I'm having trouble with (SBL Greek / SBL BibLit) only have one style and Sonoma is distorting the font in an attempt to render a new style correctly. UBS5 looks terrible right now with all of the OT quotations being a pixelated mess (when using SBL BibLit or SBL Greek).
I have temporarily switched my Greek font to "Default" because whatever font that is, it contains styles for bold, italic, etc.
I think we can expect to see this behaviour in Sonoma anytime the font engine tries to create / extrapolate an effect based on a typeface. So all the creative highlights will probably distort and for some fonts basic things like bold / italic will do this as well.
I hope this will be fixed by Apple quickly as things "looking good" is a cardinal virtue for Apple. But I don't think this is something Logos can fix on its own.
0 -
-
-
Every one of these posts is extremely helpful. Thank you all and keep them coming. Appreciated more than you know!
0 -
Thank you for the reports of the highlighting issue on Sonoma. We have reproduced the issue in-house and will work on a fix.
0 -
0
-
Hiya,
Thanks so much for the improvements. It seems as though the highlights as still not as crisp as they were prior to the Sonoma. It seems the problem may reside when the highlights are combined, OR it may just be my old monitors. Here is a screen shot which I hope can help display the difference in single highlights vis combined highlights.
If this is the end of the matter - no drama at all. It will just be my first world problem.
0