Brand new search engine ready to be tested
Comments
-
PL said:
Can we have this ("Summarize") as a separate function available as a button, for us to summarize any blob of text (a section, a chapter, an article, a whole book)?
Patience, my friend! But yes, summarizing articles outside of search is something we're actively exploring.
0 -
Answers to your questions:
1. Yes - for sure; please get this released sooner rather than later (doesn't have to be perfect to release it)
2. Yes - for sure; soon, please
3. Yes, only insofar as I can see. Since I do not own the books that it summarizes, I cannot give an accurate assessment of the summary. If the summary is accurate, then this would be very helpful indeed.
0 -
Mark,
I had heard about the topic of social teaching within the Catholic Church in a piece presented on NPR; I am intrigued. So, I presented the topic to Experimental search and received overall good results. Most coverage came from dictionaries and encyclopedias.
I'm more interested in monographs. To be fair, my question is better asked in the forums. One particularly standout reference came from History of the Catholic Church: From the Apostolic Age to the Third Millennium. Where it covered the practice of the apostle Paul and contrasted it with modern day practices.
My conclusion from this single test of the idea is that it is helpful.
Meanwhile, Jesus kept on growing wiser and more mature, and in favor with God and his fellow man.
International Standard Version. (2011). (Lk 2:52). Yorba Linda, CA: ISV Foundation.
MacBook Pro MacOS Sequoia 15.3 1TB SSD
0 -
Mark Barnes (Logos) said:
So three questions:
- Do you find these summaries accurate?
- Do they make it quicker for you to get answers to your questions or see whether an article is relevant?
- Do they make it easier for you to see whether a book you don't own is relevant and helpful for you?
1. They seem reasonable for books not in my Library, and comprehensive for those I have.
2. Yes
3. Yes
Dave
===Windows 11 & Android 13
0 -
Mark Barnes (Logos) said:
Do you find these summaries accurate?
My search is an actual work case not a test case "Passion narrative outside canonical Bibles" The quality of the summary depended upon the structure of the resource. Lexham Bible Dictionary did very well. Brown's death of the Messiah was considerably less successful but still useful.
Mark Barnes (Logos) said:Do they make it quicker for you to get answers to your questions or see whether an article is relevant?
In this particular case, no because what I was looking for was in the detail (I wanted the references in the Gospel of Peter OR confirmation that it was classified as a passion Gospel). However, in many cases it could speed up my relevance review.
Mark Barnes (Logos) said:Do they make it easier for you to see whether a book you don't own is relevant and helpful for you?
Well, asking for a summary in The Invitation: A Theology of Evangelism simply gave me the same excerpt ... apparently the section is very short ... seeing a longer preview would actually provide the useful information. For Reading Mark’s Christology under Caesar: Jesus the Messiah and Roman Imperial Ideology the summary became so generic as to be meaningless. So I'm really unsure ... at the very least, it would be helpful only in certain circumstances.
Total evaluation - move ahead with implementation on other platforms. It will be a major help for some, a nicety for others -- but it is the sort of gee-whiz that Logos users would show off to their friends. I'm assuming that you are moving towards a market strategy of hooking the masses on the web app from which they'll grow into an installed Logos app and resources.
Orthodox Bishop Alfeyev: "To be a theologian means to have experience of a personal encounter with God through prayer and worship."; Orthodox proverb: "We know where the Church is, we do not know where it is not."
0 -
I tried the following search:
was paul in prison when he wrote 2 thessalonians
The first search result was great and answered my question in the first line of the first search result:
"First and Second Thessalonians were written “from the field” after Paul had left and moved onto another site in his ongoing missionary work and church development;"
The result of "Summarize" started off very general. Then, at the end of the paragraph, the answer was given:
"Notably, Philippians and Philemon were written from prison, while the others were written while Paul was actively engaged in missionary work and church development."
In short: Both provided the answer. The Search result provided an instant answer. The Summarize result required more reading before the result was given.
This is what is to be expected from the two beta features. They are not identical but have different purposes.
Great job, Mark!
0 -
I am very happy about this new Search. I could find a result which I am not able to find with Logos App. Thank you Logos!
Blessings in Christ.
0 -
Keep the positive energy coming and pray that this search achieves its goal and is adopted into the stable version. I threw it a knuckle ball and it performed poorly.Tes said:I am very happy about this new Search. I could find a result which I am not able to find with Logos App. Thank you Logos!
Question: what does time have to do with salvation Not a single answer was acceptable. Magesterium AI was better.
Meanwhile, Jesus kept on growing wiser and more mature, and in favor with God and his fellow man.
International Standard Version. (2011). (Lk 2:52). Yorba Linda, CA: ISV Foundation.
MacBook Pro MacOS Sequoia 15.3 1TB SSD
0 -
Beloved Amodeo said:
Question: what does time have to do with salvation Not a single answer was acceptable.
Try time and salvation
Remember, it is not a query engine. So rebekah die will get more definitive answers than when did rebekah die.
Dave
===Windows 11 & Android 13
0 -
Dave Hooton said:
Remember, it is not a query engine. So rebekah die will get more definitive answers than when did rebekah die.
True, it's not a query engine, but it's supposed to be able to understand natural language, moving people away from the need to know how to construct precise search queries with just the most important keywords. It's not there yet, evidently.
Beloved Amodeo said:Question: what does time have to do with salvation Not a single answer was acceptable.
Google does a better job of this. One of the top hits was this interesting article:
What Might Time in Quantum Mechanics Mean for the Doctrine of Salvation?
0 -
This indeed offered more helpful answers, however, they came further down from the top. I believe the tool still needs work in dealing with such questions. Thanks, Dave!Dave Hooton said:Beloved Amodeo said:Question: what does time have to do with salvation Not a single answer was acceptable.
Try time and salvation
Remember, it is not a query engine. So rebekah die will get more definitive answers than when did rebekah die.
Meanwhile, Jesus kept on growing wiser and more mature, and in favor with God and his fellow man.
International Standard Version. (2011). (Lk 2:52). Yorba Linda, CA: ISV Foundation.
MacBook Pro MacOS Sequoia 15.3 1TB SSD
0 -
When you say Google do you mean the search engine or Google Bard. Since you didn't explicitly mention Bard I take you to mean the search engine. Thanks Rosie!Rosie Perera said:Beloved Amodeo said:Question: what does time have to do with salvation Not a single answer was acceptable.
Google does a better job of this. One of the top hits was this interesting article:
What Might Time in Quantum Mechanics Mean for the Doctrine of Salvation?
Meanwhile, Jesus kept on growing wiser and more mature, and in favor with God and his fellow man.
International Standard Version. (2011). (Lk 2:52). Yorba Linda, CA: ISV Foundation.
MacBook Pro MacOS Sequoia 15.3 1TB SSD
0 -
Beloved Amodeo said:
When you say Google do you mean the search engine or Google Bard. Since you didn't explicitly mention Bard I take you to mean the search engine. Thanks Rosie!Rosie Perera said:Beloved Amodeo said:Question: what does time have to do with salvation Not a single answer was acceptable.
Google does a better job of this. One of the top hits was this interesting article:
What Might Time in Quantum Mechanics Mean for the Doctrine of Salvation?
I mean the search engine. Google Bard isn't available up here in Canada yet.
0 -
I like any and all additions to Logos, especially where there is no need for special syntax. This is helpful and if I want to go deeper I can add the special syntax.
Thank you again for the continued development in the Web App and Desktop App.
0 -
Interesting! I'll check this out.Mark Barnes (Logos) said:We've been working on a brand-new search engine that doesn't require special syntax to answer your queries. It's very experimental at this stage, but we'd love your feedback.
We're not yet ready to include the search engine in the desktop app, but you can access it on web here: https://beta.app.logos.com/search?kind=semantic
We'd love you to run real questions/queries there and use the thumbs-up/thumbs-down icons in the results to let us know how well the engine has answered your query.
Then come back to this thread and let us know your overall impressions.
To be clear, we don't intend to replace our existing search engine with all its advanced syntax. That won't be going away. And it's designed for searching your books, not the Bible. But we hope it will have a place in making search even simpler.
L2 lvl4 (...) WORDsearch, all the way through L10,
0 -
Mark Barnes (Logos) said:
We're not yet ready to include the search engine in the desktop app, but you can access it on web here: https://beta.app.logos.com/search?kind=semantic
Can't wait for this to be included in the desktop app.
0 -
I find it beneficial that the search includes unlicensed resources as it allows us to know that there may be resources available for purchase in Logos that have the information we're looking for.
0 -
Armand M. Rhone said:
I find it beneficial that the search includes unlicensed resources as it allows us to know that there may be resources available for purchase in Logos that have the information we're looking for.
That's true . I have already used it too.
Blessings in Christ.
0 -
Armin said:Mark Barnes (Logos) said:
We're not yet ready to include the search engine in the desktop app, but you can access it on web here: https://beta.app.logos.com/search?kind=semantic
Can't wait for this to be included in the desktop app.
I'm eagerly waiting also!
xn = Christan man=man -- Acts 11:26 "....and the disciples were first called Christians in Antioch".
Barney Fife is my hero! He only uses an abacus with 14 rows!
0 -
Mark Barnes (Logos) said:PL said:
Can we have this ("Summarize") as a separate function available as a button, for us to summarize any blob of text (a section, a chapter, an article, a whole book)?
Patience, my friend! But yes, summarizing articles outside of search is something we're actively exploring.
[Y]
0 -
Blessings in Christ.
0 -
It's now possible to use the new experimental search to search a single book. It's not really designed to be used that way, but some people have asked for it, so we wanted to give you the opportunity to test it out.
(Unfortunately, not all books are indexed in the new search yet. If you have a large library, you may find some resources incorrectly return no results.)
0 -
Mark Barnes (Logos) said:
It's now possible to use the new experimental search to search a single book. It's not really designed to be used that way, but some people have asked for it, so we wanted to give you the opportunity to test it out.
(Unfortunately, not all books are indexed in the new search yet. If you have a large library, you may find some resources incorrectly return no results.)
Thank you Marks for the great effort has been done.
Blessings in Christ.
0 -
-
-
Mark Barnes (Logos) said:
Thanks, Kiyah. We'll get that fixed.
FYI...When I switched to All Books and then switched back to Your Books it now only shows my books. It seems as if the glitch is just on the initial load of the search window with "Your Books" preselected. It displays results for unlicensed books until you switch to "All Books" and then switch it back to "Your Books". I closed and reopened the web app and got the same problem. On the initial load, "Your Books" is preselected but the results include all books.
0 -
As we continue to iterate on this, we're thinking of adding some very simple search syntax for those occasions when the results are too broad or too narrow.
A minus sign before a word would mean to exclude any articles that included that word: e.g.. dead sea -scrolls
But what syntax should we use the ensure that ALL articles included a word? Two have been suggested:
- dead sea "scrolls"
- dead sea +scrolls
Which of those (or something else) do you think would be best and most intuitive?
PS - by default, this search engine returns results that include ANY of the words but ranks much more highly results that include all the words. That would continue to be the default, because it seems to work pretty well, but these would give power users just a little more control.
0 -
Mark Barnes (Logos) said:
- dead sea "scrolls"
- dead sea +scrolls
Which of those (or something else) do you think would be best and most intuitive?
For me the +scrolls would work best and be consistent with other systems.
0 -
Mark Barnes (Logos) said:
But what syntax should we use the ensure that ALL articles included a word? Two have been suggested:
- dead sea "scrolls"
- dead sea +scrolls
The quotes are compatible with my other software but I think the + is a better choice given the use of quotes for text strings.
Orthodox Bishop Alfeyev: "To be a theologian means to have experience of a personal encounter with God through prayer and worship."; Orthodox proverb: "We know where the Church is, we do not know where it is not."
0 -
Most people are used to Google search. Their search syntax is described here:
https://www.google.com/advanced_search
If a word should be excluded from the search results, they use -scrolls. If a word must be included, they use "scrolls", which is the same syntax as for searching exact phrases, e.g., "dead sea scrolls". I like this approach as we would otherwise need two operators )+ and ") if an exact phrase must be included.
I would use the same syntax as Google does as this is what we are used to.
0 -
Armin said:
Most people are used to Google search. Their search syntax is described here:
https://www.google.com/advanced_search
If a word should be excluded from the search results, they use -scrolls. If a word must be included, they use "scrolls", which is the same syntax as for searching exact phrases, e.g., "dead sea scrolls". I like this approach as we would otherwise need two operators )+ and ") if an exact phrase must be included.
I would use the same syntax as Google does as this is what we are used to.
[Y]
0 -
Armin said:
Most people are used to Google search. Their search syntax is described here:
i think you misunderstand the syntax
- All these words is not the same as a phrase (next option) e.g. dead sea scrolls (in any order, any separation)
- the exact word or phrase is "dead sea scrolls" (as in Logos Search)
- if you want "Dead sea" with "scrolls" then use "Dead sea" scrolls
- there is some ambiguity with "Dead sea" "scrolls" but it is not the same as "dead sea scrolls"
So I support the "Dead sea" +scrolls syntax to complement "Dead sea" -scrolls
Dave
===Windows 11 & Android 13
0 -
Dave Hooton said:
i think you misunderstand the syntax
- All these words is not the same as a phrase (next option) e.g. dead sea scrolls (in any order, any separation)
- the exact word or phrase is "dead sea scrolls" (as in Logos Search)
- if you want "Dead sea" with "scrolls" then use "Dead sea" scrolls
- there is some ambiguity with "Dead sea" "scrolls" but it is not the same as "dead sea scrolls"
So I support the "Dead sea" +scrolls syntax to complement "Dead sea" -scrolls
Here is an example from Google:
If I do the following weird search
this is a test Armin jana
I get the following result:
If I then click on
Show results with: jana
the URL changes to:
Although it looks like Google also accepts
+jana
as syntax to require that the word jana is in the search results, its internal syntax uses
"jana"
This means that Google uses the same operator (i.e. " ") independent if only a single word or if an exact phrase needs to be included.
So using Dave's example
"Dead sea" +scrolls
seems to be the same as
"Dead sea" "scrolls"
for Google.
0 -
One more thing from the following webpage:
https://ahrefs.com/blog/google-advanced-search-operators/
So Google uses " " to ensure that either an individual word or a phrase is included in the search result. The plus operator is no longer officially used in Google, while the minus operator is still in use:
0 -
I like quotes because it is what I'm used to (and, I confess, I've tried using it already in the normal search to see if it works).
However, if there was a logical reason to use +, for example to distinguish between an exact phrase and a required phrase, or if - was set to exclude and + to include, then I would be willing to consider +.
0 -
Just to clarify: I am not Armin van Buuren, nor affiliated to him, nor have I ever listened to his music. [:D] I was just searching for an example.
0 -
Armin said:
This means that Google uses the same operator (i.e. " ") independent if only a single word or if an exact phrase needs to be included.
So using Dave's example
"Dead sea" +scrolls
seems to be the same as
"Dead sea" "scrolls"
I find Google Search to be extremely ambiguous
"Dead sea" "scrolls" ===> 1. scrolls 2. Dead sea where 1. = first line in Advanced Search, 2. = 2nd line which appears as
scrolls "Dead sea" after the Advanced Search button is pressed.
If "und" is specified it will look for "and". If "is" is specified it will find it within a word.
For our AI Search, "Dead sea" +scrolls means it must include that whole word "scrolls" in Results as well as the phrase
"Dead sea scrolls" means the phrase must be included.
Dead sea scrolls means that any of the words could be omitted.
"Dead sea" -scrolls means that "scrolls" cannot be included in the results (I'm only interested in the location!).
Dave
===Windows 11 & Android 13
0 -
I have become very comfortable with the Google syntax. I actually have never used Google's advanced search interface. I just know one thing: Whatever is between double quotes has to be found in exactly the same form in the search results. So my Google search
"Dead sea" "scrolls"
means that the phrase "dead sea" as well as the word "scrolls" needs to be in the search results. I find this to be very intuitive.
@Dave: To be consistent with your suggestion, you would need to replace
"Dead sea" -scrolls
with
+"Dead sea" -scrolls
For me, this is too cumbersome.
Why re-invent the wheel? Google seems to work well for most people. I would just follow Google's syntax as it has become a quasi standard.
0 -
Armin said:
@Dave: To be consistent with your suggestion, you would need to replace
"Dead sea" -scrolls
with
+"Dead sea" -scrolls
For me, this is too cumbersome.
It is cumbersome because the + isn't necessary. One element has to be included if the other must be absent.
Dave
===Windows 11 & Android 13
0 -
It's exciting to anticipate the inclusion of the search engine in the desktop app. While it may not be ready for integration just yet, the ability to access it through the web version here: https://beta.app.logos.com/search?kind=semantic offers a great opportunity to explore its features in the meantime. Rest assured, the Logos team is continuously working on enhancements to provide users with an exceptional experience.
0 -
I get the impression that the AI summary provides a general summary of the linked article, but would find it much more helpful if the summary directly addresses the search query.
0 -
The language limit is not crossed: For me, the app works in German. I enter a German search query and get - for all books - only German answers. :-(
Also: If I change the app-language to English the results are much bedder.
0 -
Stephan Thelen said:
I get the impression that the AI summary provides a general summary of the linked article, but would find it much more helpful if the summary directly addresses the search query.
Where possible, we try to directly address the search query in the summary. We're generally more successful when the query is a question rather than just keywords. What was the search query you were trying?
0 -
Mark Barnes (Logos) said:
What was the search query you were trying?
"when did Martin Luther convert?"
Summary of the first answer:
Martin Luther converted to become a monk on July 7, 1505, after being thrown to the ground during a thunderstorm. He made a promise to become a monk and entered the Black Cloister of the Augustinian Hermits in Erfurt. Luther was ordained on February 27, 1507, and was assigned to study theology. He later transferred to Wittenberg to study and lecture on moral philosophy. In March 1509, Luther received his bachelor's degree in biblical studies and became a lecturer on Peter Lombard's Sentences. In 1512, he received his doctorate in theology and was appointed as a professor of Bible. Luther continued to lecture on the Bible in Wittenberg for over thirty years.
0 -
Mark Barnes (Logos) said:
What was the search query you were trying?
second attempt:
"Where are there references to Ezekiel in Revelation?"
Then I choose the second answer and press on summary. The answer: "There are no references to Ezekiel in Revelation in the given article."!!!!!
0 -
Stephan Thelen said:
Summary of the first answer:
Martin Luther converted to become a monk on July 7, 1505,
Yeah, that's not a great summary. It is trying to answer your question in the summary, but the problem here is that no-one actually knows when Luther was converted, so neither the search engine or the summarizer was able to find an article that fully answered your question. (The answer is probably somewhere between 1518 and 1521, but scholars differ.)
0 -
Mark Barnes (Logos) said:
no-one actually knows when Luther was converted, so neither the search engine or the summarizer was able to find an article that fully answered your question. (The answer is probably somewhere between 1518 and 1521, but scholars differ.)
The question is more fundamental ... does the verb "converted" apply to Luther when used in its contemporary meaning? There was more than a decade and a half in which his doubts of particular Catholic beliefs grew. 1517-1521 was the period when the social conditions and his beliefs led to serious conflict. After his excommunication he was forced to develop his ideas more comprehensively. But, while I haven't read everything he wrote, IIRC when he speaks of his "conversion" he is speaking of his rediscovery of the "true Gospel" i.e. salvation by faith alone. So, I am always glad when "artificial intelligence" fails on ill-formed questions. Its best answer would be a summary of the meaning of conversion as Martin Luther applies it to himself. Since my source for that analysis of church history is Lutheran, I would assume it to be reasonably accurate.
Orthodox Bishop Alfeyev: "To be a theologian means to have experience of a personal encounter with God through prayer and worship."; Orthodox proverb: "We know where the Church is, we do not know where it is not."
0 -
Thank you for the church history clarification! My experience with AI is limited so far, my expectation that AI will then spit out exactly this answer (or references to it) was probably overdone.
0 -
MJ. Smith said:
when he speaks of his "conversion" he is speaking of his rediscovery of the "true Gospel" i.e. salvation by faith alone.
I think you make a good point about 'interpretive engines' (vs raw search engines). Thru my Logosian study years, my impression is Luther was little changed from Catholic ... talking with the daily participants (Christians), not the guys up front. It was only when Campbell et al. advocated do-it-yourself theology, did a major change occur (and the need for Logos!). I wonder at the interpretive engines, as theology continues to fragment, even in semantics, of what words mean.
"If myth is ideology in narrative form, then scholarship is myth with footnotes." B. Lincolm 1999.
0