ACCS Romans 1st edition

I do not see the ACCS Romans 1st edition commentary in the store yet I have a resource that cites it. LRC Romans. I am trying to access this set of pages Bray 1998, xvii–xviii -- Ancient Christian Commentary on Scripture: Romans, 1st ed. (ACCS). Can someone help?

Find more posts tagged with

Desktop App

Comments

Christian Alexander

See this link for more information. https://community.logos.com/forums/t/219308.aspx

Doug Mangum (Lexham)

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/1276796#Comment_1276796

It looks like the first edition was retired and replaced by the revised edition in 2014, which supports my guess that we didn't know the revised edition was coming when we prepared LRC Romans in 2014.

DMB

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/1276801#Comment_1276801

It looks like the first edition was retired and replaced by the revised edition in 2014,

Your skimming the intro in the 2 editions in the other thread was correct ... I compared down to periods and commas. Unusual that they didn't think some more.

Christian, just coincidental but the discussion here in ACCS-Romans was the basis for another monograph pointing to the Pseudo-Clementines on Peter (and John the Baptist). Not an easy rabbit trail.

Christian Alexander

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/1276802#Comment_1276802

DMB can you tell me what that "monograph" is? I would love to read it. I am tracing rabbit trails as you can see.

DMB

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/1276840#Comment_1276840

Well, the rabbit trail began in 'John the Baptist in History and Theology' by Joel Marcus (Amazon; earlier recommended, and now I'm re-reading to more closely track the arguments).

That led to discussion of the Pseudo-Clementines (approx 400ce-ish) and comments concerning John the Baptist followers.

Which was discussed in more conceptual depth in Edward's Early New Testament Apocrypha (Ancient Literature for New Testament Studies) where Stanley Jones discusses the significance of residual Jewish Christian beliefs (centering on Peter), vs the encroaching gentile and Pauline beliefs.

So, the reference was to the latter, but the specific Peter discussion is comparatively short (the Jones article is long, and the resource is quite good).

But quite distant from your dastardly rabbits!