Logos Pro Review

When it comes to creating customized chatbots using your own materials, here's what I've been doing lately. First, I gather all the commentaries I've read on a specific passage or subject, which is usually around 15-20 texts. Then, I copy and paste them into a Google Doc or Word document, which can end up being up to 200 pages long. Once that's done, I save the document as a PDF.

Next, I use a platform called Poe, which allows you to create customized chatbots using your own data set (in this case, the PDF) and a variety of LLM engines. The cool thing about Poe is that you can create multiple bots using the same data and experiment with them to see which one works best for your needs.

I recently used this approach when I was preparing to preach on Hebrews 13:7-18, and I was really impressed with the results. For example, I asked one of the bots to write a biblical theology of leadership based on that passage while keeping the entire book of Hebrews in mind. The bot came back with some excellent material that synthesized the information from the commentaries I had provided.

When it comes to creating customized chatbots using your own materials, here's what I've been doing lately. First, I gather all the commentaries I've read on a specific passage or subject, which is usually around 15-20 texts. Then, I copy and paste them into a Google Doc or Word document, which can end up being up to 200 pages long. Once that's done, I save the document as a PDF.

Next, I use a platform called Poe, which allows you to create customized chatbots using your own data set (in this case, the PDF) and a variety of LLM engines. The cool thing about Poe is that you can create multiple bots using the same data and experiment with them to see which one works best for your needs.

I recently used this approach when I was preparing to preach on Hebrews 13:7-18, and I was really impressed with the results. For example, I asked one of the bots to write a biblical theology of leadership based on that passage while keeping the entire book of Hebrews in mind. The bot came back with some excellent material that synthesized the information from the commentaries I had provided.

When it comes to creating customized chatbots using your own materials, here's what I've been doing lately. First, I gather all the commentaries I've read on a specific passage or subject, which is usually around 15-20 texts. Then, I copy and paste them into a Google Doc or Word document, which can end up being up to 200 pages long. Once that's done, I save the document as a PDF.

Next, I use a platform called Poe, which allows you to create customized chatbots using your own data set (in this case, the PDF) and a variety of LLM engines. The cool thing about Poe is that you can create multiple bots using the same data and experiment with them to see which one works best for your needs.

I recently used this approach when I was preparing to preach on Hebrews 13:7-18, and I was really impressed with the results. For example, I asked one of the bots to write a biblical theology of leadership based on that passage while keeping the entire book of Hebrews in mind. The bot came back with some excellent material that synthesized the information from the commentaries I had provided.

Timothy James Mills said:Scrivener's note-keeping features are amazing and really user-friendly, which is why I think it's better than a lot of other writing apps out there. It's a fantastic platform for all sorts of writing projects, but it really shines when you're dealing with something complex and need to stay organized.

The note-keeping features is one of my absolute favorites in Scrivener. I love that everything is right there as I'm writing and I don't have to search all over the place or have multiple windows open. Also, I love the ability to move around and write in different sections at will. If I what I want to write for Section A is not flowing, I can easily go over to Section B, and then get back to Section A when I'm ready. I don't have to deal with the confusion of moving text around or dealing with formatting issues etc when all I want to do at the moment is write.

Timothy James Mills said:

That being said, when it comes to the final editing phase, Scrivener might not be the way to go. Its editing tools aren't quite as robust as what you'd find in Microsoft Word, and they're not as intuitive as Google Docs.

I agree re: Scrivener's editing capabilities. The spell-check is terrible (worse than Logos's spell-check for the Notes editor), and I'm on my own when it comes to sentence structure, punctuation etc. However, I much prefer longform writing in Scrivener to MS Word; in Word, I find myself editing as I write because I'm constantly stopping to see what the blue underlining is about! In Scrivener, though, I only pause occasionally to fix misspelled words (or ignore them, as is very often the case). I can actually write in peace without the constant distraction of editing on the fly.