I was surprised to see items such as "absolute (philosophy)" under belief system as it is not a system in itself but is an element of more comprehensive belief systems. But as I could justify this stretching of vocabulary, i decided to let it slide. However, when I expanded a belief system and found a list of authors that was a step too far. It is appropriate to categorize authors by belief system but to imply they are a subtype of a particular belief system is a step too far for me. What is the actual intention i.e. is this a data bug or is this actually intended?
