Which book or books in Logos are a helpful resource for analyzing the texts that are part of the Jewish and Christian canons of Scripture and which are not? Additionally, I want to investigate the social contexts in which certain works of literature were seen as authoritative and others as uninspired or heretical. I am not looking for exegesis of the texts in these canons. I am looking to do a social, socio rhetorical and literary analysis. It seems to me that McDonald, Craig Evans and John Collins are the major scholars on this field of study. If I am not being as in depth or irrational in my question please tell me. I have read the factbook entries on these canons. I also read some encyclopedia articles from AYBD, Hastings, Lexham Bible Dictionary. I want to go deeper but am hesitant to find more sources and make unecessary purchases. Also, I have sent in a few inter-library loans for these books below. I think they are possibly benefical to my study of the social contexts of these canons of ancient literature.
Jewish and Christian scriptures: the function of'canonical'and'non-canonical'religious texts by James H Charlesworth, Lee M McDonald
Early Biblical Interpretation by Rowan A. Greer
Ancient Jewish and Christian Scriptures: New Developments in Canon Controversy by John J. Collins, Craig A. Evans, Lee Martin McDonald
I have a copy of the following books but I have not read them yet. Are they good on my topic?
Forgotten Scriptures: The Selection and Rejection of Early Religious Writings by Lee M McDonald (print version)
The Concept of the Messiah in the Scriptures of Judaism and Christianity by Shirley Lucass (Logos version)
Christian Conceptions of Jewish Books: The Pfefferkorn Affair by Avner Shamir (print copy)
Behind the Text edited by C. Stephen Evans, Craig Bartholomew (print copy)
Pseudonymity and Canon: An Investigation into the Relationship of Authorship and Authority in Jewish and Earliest Christian Tradition by David G. Meade (print copy)
I will post my Logos searching when I get home in the morning.