ChatGPT INTEGRATION PLEASE🔥🔥🔥

Factbook is nice. But if you could somehow introduce and integrate Open AI ChatGPT in to Logos.
I would love it if Logos better understood the resources I own and become better at answering questions based on the resources I own.

This would be INCREDIBLY valuable for the user.
AND become a BIG reason to purchase more resources.

Find more posts tagged with

Comments

Brooks H. Erickson

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/1287167#Comment_1287167

Suggest looking over Google's NotebookLM tool. That is, notebooklm.google.com. It is experimental, so it may disappear at any moment. So I'd like a quick way to syntheses make the most of commentary segments in passage study. This tool--which is private so as to protect your text--allows you a nice desktop work space to a.) copy and paste commentary source segments to the passage you are studying, then b.) "chat" or explore questions about highlights, differences and similarities. This system will summarize sources and begin suggesting questions for your consideration, allowing you to "pin" most useful responses in the workspace. Nice.

Reference: https://www.computerworld.com/article/3712691/google-notebooklm-generative-ai-notes-app.html

J. Remington Bowling

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/1287169#Comment_1287169

Very cool, thanks for sharing.

I'm sure the Faithlife devs can expect lots of requests for similar notebook functionality... which will happen never

Jack

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/1287167#Comment_1287167

I've used ChapGPT to report on defined searches and comparisons of books of the Bible and the potential for good is significant.

Two possible uses of the search result are;

1. I use the search output to accelerate and focus a thoughtful reading of the scripture.

2. I use the output of GPT's report as "gospel" and take a shortcut to bad theology. Add the further negative impact to others who might trust what I say or write as a result.

Is this really very different to how we use current Logos tools combined with our many resources? I know it is lightning fast and the output can vary widely based on our ability to frame the questions.

Keystride a3logics

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/1287167#Comment_1287167

Getting philosophical here, it's understandable to feel less than enthusiastic. While we often appreciate the upsides of AI, the dystopian downsides are glaring. It's a recurring theme in futuristic literature and warnings from thinkers. Every mind, including real AI, carries biases, often reflecting the creators' ideologies. For instance, even The Cosmic Sceptic persuaded ChatGPT and integrations is all about God's existence, revealing AI's susceptibility to influence. Viewing AI merely as a tool overlooks its potential biases, challenging our trust in its information retrieval. It's crucial to acknowledge the limitations of AI and Integration Services in avoiding unintended consequences, lest we unwittingly invite dystopia into our lives.

Robert Williams

While I can appreciate the usefulness of AI browsing for the right tools, this will become a huge problem in terms of integrity. As soon as Chat GPT was released I watched several videos of it creating Expository sermons with a simple prompt. What is to keep so called preachers from taking these transcripts and preaching them? It does nothing for the craft. if they integrate with Chat GPT or any other AI they should keep it to research and only within the personal library. I am all for grammar, tone, simplicity, but full fledged sermons is a no from me.

J. Remington Bowling

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/1287167#Comment_1287167

Question for staff: would it be permissible to freely share embeddings we create from exports? The embeddings wouldn't include the text of exports, but would include a Logos URL that links back to the resource inside Logos. This would only allow someone to do an embedding search that returns a Logos link. Other standard metadata about the document might also be included (author, title, publisher, page number).

Mark Barnes (Logos)

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/1302770#Comment_1302770

Question for staff: would it be permissible to freely share embeddings we create from exports? The embeddings wouldn't include the text of exports, but would include a Logos URL that links back to the resource inside Logos. This would only allow someone to do an embedding search that returns a Logos link. Other standard metadata about the document might also be included (author, title, publisher, page number).

We don't own the copyright on the majority of books you can export from Logos, so we don't have the ability to give you that permission. You'd have to ask the individual rights holders.

J. Remington Bowling

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/1304371#Comment_1304371

Thanks. Does FaithLife have plans to do something like semantic search with embeddings? Would probably benefit from their own embedding model.

Bradley Grainger (Logos)

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/1304497#Comment_1304497

Does FaithLife have plans to do something like semantic search with embeddings? Would probably benefit from their own embedding model.

Yes: https://community.logos.com/forums/t/221560.aspx

MJ. Smith

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/1304497#Comment_1304497

semantic search with embeddings

For those unfamiliar with the technical term Graft - 9 Best Embedding Models for Semantic Search

J. Remington Bowling

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/1304502#Comment_1304502

Does FaithLife have plans to do something like semantic search with embeddings? Would probably benefit from their own embedding model.

Yes: https://community.logos.com/forums/t/221560.aspx

Awesome. This will really boost user's ability to mine their resources (and save me lots of time trying to do it myself!).

Timothy James Mills

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/1287167#Comment_1287167

NotebookLM capabilities combined with Logos books would make an extremely powerful tool. I am already exporting my Logos books as PDFs so that I can use them in NotebookLM. Currently NotebookLM allows for 50 sources of 500,000 words (this being roughly 1000-1300 pages). This amounts to around 60,000 pages of source material per notebook! By strategically grouping books on specific topics or passages, I'm seeing fantastic results for my research. This integration should undoubtedly be the future of Logos AI.

Also, the hallucinations which are so concerning in AI in general are almost non-existent in NotebookLM because google has somehow limited the scope of usable information to your sources.

Guno van Engel

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/1308482#Comment_1308482

Future of Logos

Guno van Engel

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/1313964#Comment_1313964

How Should We Think about AI & Bible Study? (logos.com)

From Data to Discernment: Why AI Can’t Replace Cultivating of Wisdom (logos.com)

What's New in Logos? July 2024

"One of the great things about the next version of Logos is that we're using AI the right way. It's an incredible tool to help us to search, distill, and synthesize. Pastors didn’t go into it to be administrators or to move paperwork around. Everything we can do to free them up to meditate and preach the Word and to spend time with the congregation is a win."

—Bob Pritchett, Founder