When did FL take away...

I recently noticed that on the Logos web page, there are no more "results" showing. When I searched for a book it used to display how many results there were. How many books I had or how many I didn't.

Even on the home page, there is no longer the number of books available.

Any idea why this is?

mm.

Find more posts tagged with

Comments

Aaron Hamilton

I strongly prefer a sometimes inaccurate number of results to an always absent number of results. This is a very good example of how to turn a minor annoyance into a major annoyance. Please don't go this route. Bring back the number of results, even if a perfect fix isn't currently in view.

Christian Alexander

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/1306627#Comment_1306627

This started in mid June 2024. https://community.logos.com/forums/t/223429.aspx See this forum. This is from the mouth of FaithLife. They have hid the problem and caused a major irritation and vexation for all users.

Milkman

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/1306631#Comment_1306631

Thanks. I didn't realize this was a 'burr.' I guess that's why it's a pain in the ... [:P]

This started in mid June 2024. https://community.logos.com/forums/t/223429.aspx See this forum. This is from the mouth of FaithLife. They have hid the problem and caused a major irritation and vexation for all users.

MJ. Smith

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/1306631#Comment_1306631

They have hid the problem and caused a major irritation and vexation for all users.

Hmmm ... I didn't realize I wasn't a user. I've experienced neither irritation nor vexation, major or minor.

Aaron Hamilton

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/1306654#Comment_1306654

Hmmm ... I didn't realize I wasn't a user. I've experienced neither irritation nor vexation, major or minor.

It is certainly understandable that various issues affect different users differently. However, it makes logical sense to me that the users who cared enough about the number of results listed to observe inaccuracies will be the ones who are bothered to an even greater extent by the absence of the count entirely. Rather than the previous state of having an accurate count only some of the time, these users now are faced with the situation of never having an accurate count. I understand that FL currently has bigger fish to fry, but this "solution" seems a bit out of left field if one were to ask my honest opinion.

MJ. Smith

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/1306662#Comment_1306662

However, it makes logical sense to me that the users who cared enough about the number of results listed to observe inaccuracies will be the ones who are bothered to an even greater extent by the absence of the count entirely.

I didn't mean to imply that those who experience irritation or vexation were not justified in doing so ... I was just reacting to an overload of black/white thinking that failed to recognize the shades.

Aaron Hamilton

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/1306669#Comment_1306669

I was just reacting to an overload of black/white thinking that failed to recognize the shades.

[Y]