Does the Summarize Tool read footnotes?
Does the Summarize tool in the resource panel read the footnotes in the selected text and take that information into account in its summarization? Or does it ignore footnotes and just summarize the main text? (See below for what I'm referring to.)
Is this summary taking into account the information in footnotes 29 and 30 in the final paragraph?
Find more posts tagged with
Comments
Sort by:
1 - 1 of
11
No. Footnotes are not included in the summarized content.
Follow-up question: What is the maximum word count for these summaries? For example, I just summarized an entire part of a book, Part III of this book contained two chapters. I copied the summary into MS Word and it was 269 words long. What would be the maximum allowable word count for the summaries? Is it something like 300 words?
The maximum length is based on the large language model backing the feature. As of today, summaries are generated by a model that has a max context of 128,000 tokens.
Does the token count for the summarisation include the word count of the text to be summarised as well as the word count of the summary? I think the consumption of tokens included the work done to produce the summary, as well as the production of the summary itself. Is that right?
👁️ 👁️
Where can I find out what this means? In the article on How do AI Credits work, nothing is mentioned about tokens. Why is it so difficult to understand how much of AI we are using each time we us it?
I think it's because it isn't straightforward. The number of tokens used depends on various factors which are not always constant, so measuring them is difficult.
It's like measuring the consumption of petrol when driving a car. The manual for the car says that it is X miles per gallon, but in reality, it depends on how fast you're going, whether you're going uphill or downhill, according to some the weather is a factor. Then there is also the efficiency of the engine and the kind of fuel you're using. We all accept the average given in the manual as a fact, but if measured day to day it would change continually.
With the AI summary it's dependent on the length of the text being summarised, as well as the complexity of the language. It's also dependent on the length of the summary, and the effort required to produce coherent sentences.
Amongst the major AI providers, I haven't found anyone who will commit to how many tokens it takes to produce an outcome.
👁️ 👁️
Logos abstracts all of that detail away. Our users don't have to worry about any of it. You're free to just summarize your books to your heart's content.
We are essentially managing all those factors and differences for you. It all averages out across our user base and ideally nobody should need to worry about any limits (in reality, far less than 1% of our users ever even approach their monthly limits).
I understand things can change as we bring on more subscribers and continue to ship new and exciting features; but for now, I think the current limits should be more than adequate and stay out of your way. We will be sure to communicate if any changes need to be made and welcome your feedback along the way.
I am in the 1%. It was the Synopsis. I felt compelled to see what it could do. It can write poems and perform other tricks.
What about generating questions in the Sermon Builder and in the Study Bible tool. Are they on the expensive side like Synopsis. Just looking for ways to manage overall consumption. It is good to hear I don't have to worry much about summarisation.
👁️ 👁️