Integrate Artificial Intelligence

Is Logos moving toward using AI at all? It would be great to be able to select specific resources to train the AI on my account. It'd be kind of like ChatGPT that is trained with my own resources.

If Logos is not working on this, I respectfully request they consider it. It would be powerful!

Find more posts tagged with

Submitted

Web App

Status: None

Comments

David Cornish

So O'Reilly are working on some interesting things on this in the same sphere - discussed in https://learning.oreilly.com/live-events/chatgpt-possibilities-and-pitfalls/0636920090877/0636920090876/.

Their solution provides a Q&A type interface to ask questions across their resources, which will use generative AI to produce an answer , but critically then produces citations to the resources that the answers come from.

This permits:

* Checking the validity of the answer
* Going and reading on it in more depth

From a logos perspective it could also permit up-selling of additional resources through surfacing resources which are not currently in your library.

jp010211

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/1332086#Comment_1332086

@David Cornish Great use case! I look fwd to seeing that in action!

unknown

Would love to see AI work with Logos software.

unknown

It would be great if Logos had an AI bot that could answer my questions better than ChatGPT:

Me:
In his commentary on Matthew (*The Gospel According to Matthew: An Introduction and Commentary* (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1990), p. 333), R. T. France argues that in Matthew 23:39, the word “For, with which the verse begins, unambiguously links it with God’s abandonment of his house in v. 38.” The verse is therefore not a prediction, but a "negative condition."

Do any other commentators on Matthew take this same interpretation?

ChatGPT:

I don't have real-time access to specific commentaries, and I don't have information on all existing commentaries up to my last update in September 2021. Interpretations of biblical verses can vary among scholars and commentators. To find out if other commentators share R. T. France's interpretation of Matthew 23:39, it would be best to consult various commentaries on the Gospel of Matthew or academic studies on the topic. Check with theological libraries, online databases, or specific commentaries on Matthew for a comprehensive view of scholarly interpretations.

unknown

Google has created NotebookLM which allows you to ask questions of more than one resource at a time if you wish. With Notebook LM it can only answer questions found in the documents downloaded not on the internet. That type of capability would be an incredible resource within Logos.

Anderson Abreu

Yes. Faithlife has already officially launched (but not for everyone) intelligent search and other AI features, but on a subscription basis due to the costs involved for third parties....

David Taylor, Jr.

I think we can probably close this one out as this is in the New Era of Logos.