TIP OF THE DAY 71: Red heifer, scapegoat, bloody bird as type-antitype

I am adding these posts to the previous tip list L/V 10 Tip of the Day This is a recreation of the post that got lost somewhere in the forum dungeon …

QUESTION71: Define the type/anti-type relationship.

ANSWER: from Perplexity:

In biblical interpretation, a type and antitype represent a prophetic relationship between elements in the Old and New Testaments. The type, found in the Old Testament, is a person, event, or institution that foreshadows or prefigures something to come in the New Testament. The antitype, found in the New Testament, is the fulfillment or completion of what was foreshadowed by the type.

This relationship is characterized by several key aspects:

Foreshadowing: The type serves as a spiritual "picture" or shadow of a future reality.

Fulfillment: The antitype is the realization or completion of what was prefigured by the type.

Divine design: Types are intentionally designed by God to point to their antitypes.

Historical reality: Both types and antitypes are based on real historical events, persons, or institutions.

Theological significance: The type-antitype relationship demonstrates the unity of God's plan throughout Scripture.

Examples of type-antitype relationships include:

Adam (type) and Christ (antitype): Adam prefigures Christ as the head of humanity.

The Exodus (type) and salvation in Christ (antitype): God's deliverance of Israel from Egypt foreshadows spiritual deliverance through Christ.

The Passover lamb (type) and Christ's sacrifice (antitype): The sacrificial lamb points to Christ's atoning death.

It's important to note that types may not correspond perfectly to their antitypes in every detail, and interpretation should be guided by clear biblical connections rather than arbitrary associations.

QUESTION71: How is a scapegoat a type of Christ?

ANSWER: Keach, Benjamin. Tropologia: A Key to Open Scripture Metaphors. London: William Hill Collingridge, 1856.

THE SCAPE-GOAT A TYPE OF CHRIST

Lev. 16:20, &c.

I. The Scape-goat, called in Hebrew, azazel, that is, the Goat gone away, &c., was so called, because he escaped alive; representing Christ Jesus alive in his divine nature, though put to death in his human nature, or alive after he rose again from the dead.

II. He was presented alive, that by him reconciliation might be made, and this after the other Goat was sacrificed; signifying, according to the learned, two things: (1.) The resurrection of Christ. (2.) Our rising with him, from the death of sin, to a life of grace, by the operation of the Spirit, &c.

III. “Aaron shall put or lay both his hands upon the head of the live goat, and confess over him all the iniquities of the children of Israel, &c., and he shall bear them,” Lev. 16:21. Figuring thereby, how Christ should bear all our sins, viz., the punishment due to them; “The Lord hath laid on him the iniquity of us all,” Isa. 53.

IV. And so the He-goat was sent into the wilderness, or land not inhabited, which the Greek calleth abaton, wayless, or inaccessible: figuring the utter abolishing of our sins by Jesus Christ, both from the face of God, that so they may not appear before him against us, to condemn us, or be imputed or charged upon us, not have any dominion or power over us.

V. They were to confess upon the head of the goat all their iniquities; signifying if we would have our sins carried away, and for ever be forgotten, we must confess them, &c. By this, saith Ainsworth, it appeareth, that as the killed Goat figured Christ killed, or put to death, for our sins; so this living Goat figured him also, “who bore our griefs, and carried our sorrows,” Isa. 53:4–6. And because Christ was not only to die for our offences, but also to rise again for our justification; and because these two things could not fitly be shadowed by one beast, which the priest having killed, could not make alive again: therefore God appointed two, that in the slain beast Christ’s death, and in the live beast his life and victory might be shadowed. See the like mystery in the two birds, for the cleansing the leper.

QUESTION71: How is a red heifer a type of Christ?

ANSWER: Keach, Benjamin. Tropologia: A Key to Open Scripture Metaphors. London: William Hill Collingridge, 1856.

THE SACRIFICE OF THE RED HEIFER A TYPE OF CHRIST

Numb. 19

I. The colour of this beast was red. As other Sacrifices of beasts prefigured Christ; so this, saith Ainsworth, in special figured him. Red signified his human nature, and participation of our afflictions, and the bloodiness of his agony, and grievous passion.

II. She must be without blemish, and upon whom never yoke came. This signified the perfect holiness of Christ, who never bore the yoke of sinfulness, nor was subject to the laws or precepts of man.

III. The Heifer was burned without the host, and her blood sprinkled seven times before the tabernacle of the congregation, which signified Christ’s suffering without the gates of Jerusalem, Heb. 13:11, 12.