How are points earned in the new forums?
When Logos transitioned to the new forums platform, within a few hours I was notified that I received a certain number of points for doing certain activities. I got a message that I needed to do a certain activities to advance to the next level. Since then, I have heard nothing about points.
It is not clear how one earns additional points to earn more "stars" in the forums. If this feature is intended to encourage participation in the forums, the activities one must do advance should be clearer. Perhaps the user could see their progress to the next level.
Comments
-
Agree with your point, though (no offense) I think it (the awards system) is silly.
And you do know, you got the 'Name Dropper' award? As well as, mousing over the awards shows the levels. But I'm guessing that's not what you're talking about.
"If myth is ideology in narrative form, then scholarship is myth with footnotes." B. Lincolm 1999.
0 -
Agree with your point, though (no offense) I think it (the awards system) is silly.
As do a number of others . . .
Orthodox Bishop Alfeyev: "To be a theologian means to have experience of a personal encounter with God through prayer and worship."; Orthodox proverb: "We know where the Church is, we do not know where it is not."
0 -
The challenge with gamifying forum contributions is that it can spur users to post content to run up a score through post volume or reactions.
My primary purpose in participating in this community is to learn how to use Logos more effectively and discuss the future direction of computer-assisted Biblical studies.
I welcome a bit of fun amid what can sometimes be too wooden, but if there is too much noise, it detracts from making it a priority to be here.
0 -
I think we could do completely without the gamification.
👁️ 👁️
0 -
I am hoping we can cash points in on resources. Level up! Get a book!
2 -
I agree. But if it is there, the "rules" of the game should be clear.
The problem with the stars is that it implies that a 2 star person might not be a reliable source of information, just as I would probably not want to trust my life to a 2 star surgeon. Other forums with levels of users use silly titles rather than stars.
0 -
Ok … took me awhile. Are we talking those little asterisks after post count? I thought those were just line filler.
If indeed 'stars', they're an embarrassment (to me). A Harry comment is worth 10x a DMB comment (at least). And so on. I'd even say a newbie comment is quite valuable, by virtue of being fresh eyes and good observations.
"If myth is ideology in narrative form, then scholarship is myth with footnotes." B. Lincolm 1999.
0 -
I don’t care about points or badges to be honest. It might create an unhealthy sense of competition among some users.
0 -
Maybe Stars are divisors rather than multipliers and answer values actually go the other way.
0
