Dear Folk,
What are your favorite Revelation commentaries, and why?
Thanks,
Mike
Mine are Beale, G. K. (NIGTC), Mounce, R. (NICNT), and Schreiner, T. (BECNT). [Edit: Schreiner replaced Osborne in the BECNT, and I'd recommend Osborne as well, if you can get it.]
I like how they handle the text itself, esp. the Gk. ; Rev has a lot of variants and some of them are difficult…these do well in that area plus they deal with multiple views in a fair manner.
It would be important to note I have not used dozens of these so there may be better ones out there; these are the ones I've tried and found helpful.
My "go to" is Osborne BECNT 2002. I haven't read Schreiner's newer release in the same series. I find it intriguing that BECNT would release a 2nd Revelation volume when Osborne's is still in Best Commentaries top-3 of Revelation. I generally trust Schreiner, too bad Dr. Osborne passed so that we cannot get a dialogue between these 2 authors.
The Avenging of the Apostles and Prophets by Arthur Ogden. It lets Scripture interpret Scripture. Some label it preterist/early historical. It is not futuristic:
Yeah, Beale and Mounce are great.
@Michael A. Mnich it depends on the kind and level of commentary you are looking for. Aune is a mine of information about intertextuality and primary sources but hard to see the forest from the abundance of different leaves. One gets lost into the excess of secondary literature discussion. Beale is best for Jewish background, including the OT. Osborne (BECNT) is the clearest I have read in terms of "the forest." I have not used Schreiner's yet. Bauckham's Climax of Prophecy is also a solid, yet shorter, read.
» My "go to" is Osborne BECNT 2002. «
I agree…Osborne was excellent. I like Schreiner as well and referenced it since it is current. But I wouldn't hesitate to use Osborne alongside it.
If I may offer a historic—in many ways "foundational"—commentary on Revelation, let me suggest the Commentary on the Apocalypse by Andrew of Caesarea. This is a 6th-7th AD commentary that was the first fully accepted commentary on Revelation accepted in the Eastern churches. There was an earlier commentary by Oikoumenios, but this was seen as having heretical views. Andrew of Caesarea writes his commentary partly in response to Oikoumenios to correct what was seen as errant interpretation.
The commentary is significant because the book of Revelation was more slowly accepted in the East as opposed to the West. The writing of Andrew's commentary roughly coincides with the final universal acceptance of Revelation by the Eastern churches. Thus, for the East, Revelation becomes the only book in the canon that arrived with a commentary for interpretation at roughly the same time.
Thank you, Rick! I just finished up a book on this period, and the East.
Best of all, I own the commentary. Even better, ACT includes it, along with Oikoumenios. So, Logos-magic has a 3-way comparison!
Die Apokalypse des Johannes: Kommentar by Klaus Berger
1576 pages. Fruit of a lifetime of work. Simply reading the nearly 50 pages of Bibliography (containing also un-edited commentaries and non-catholic traditions) took my breath away.
BTW: Thanks to Logos/Verbum for carrying this resource!
I do recommend the translation of Andrew of Caesarea in the Fathers of the Church series over the one in the Ancient Christian Text series (though both series in general are excellent). But the translator in ACT misses some of the inherent liturgical language in the book of Revelation in his translation that is more accurately rendered by Dr. Constantinou in the Fathers of the Church volume.
do recommend the translation of Andrew of Caesarea in the Fathers of the Church series over the one in the Ancient Christian Text series (though both series in general are excellent). But the translator in ACT misses some of the inherent liturgical language in the book of Revelation in his translation that is more accurately rendered by Dr. Constantinou in the Fathers of the Church volume.
Yes, I noticed ACT was a bit laid back, though I can't speak to liturgical translation. I did want to see if the greek is available (I'm guessing not; likely Patrologia).
This is not my favorite at all, but it is was extremely helpful to me last time I preached through the book.
https://www.logos.com/product/2271/revelation-four-views?queryId=4b9bfb1bba67e24dbdb6baa30f885548
I had Osborne as a professor eons ago at Trinity Evangelical Divinity School. I'll have to check out his commentary.
Sometimes I have a note which mentions a specific place. In such cases I have been opening it in the Atlas and doing a "Copy Location" in order to save that specific place. However, I am noticing that when I click on the links I saved, it doesn't open to that view of the Atlas but a more general view. Is there a way to…
do my daily devotionals have to be downloaded off the cloud to show in dashboard "add" card?
Dear Folk, I have R. Dederen's Handbook of SDA Theology. It is NOT tagged as a theology, so does not show up in the Passage Guide under the Biblical or Systematic theology sections as an available theology resource. Do the theologies by Norman Gulley or John Peckham have the proper Logos tagging to have them show up as…
My Power Lookup tool is showing only a very limited number of resources available to it (only 2, both Lexham Lexicons, when I look up Greek words in the NT). Is there a solution to this problem? All my resources are indexed (up to date). Thanks.
With the current sale, is it worth purchasing if I already own the sermon archive? Is there a stark difference outside of the organizational aspects? I appreciate any insight. Thank you.
