4.2 beta: Reading View Paged View... First Looks.. What are your thoughts ?

Simon’s Brother
Simon’s Brother Member Posts: 6,816 ✭✭✭

Screen Resolution.... 1920 x 1080

image

Increasing Tex sizes reduce number of columns.... This is max text size with program scaling at 90%...

 

image

 

image

«13

Comments

  • Icarus38376
    Icarus38376 Member Posts: 337 ✭✭

    I like it!  I would like to see a hotkey implemented and those groovy page turns...

  • Milford Charles Murray
    Milford Charles Murray Member Posts: 5,004 ✭✭✭

    I also like that you do not have to use the "reading view" to use the "paged view"!

    Great

    Philippians 4:  4 Rejoice in the Lord always; again I will say, Rejoice. 5 Let your reasonableness be known to everyone. The Lord is at hand..........

  • Todd Phillips
    Todd Phillips Member Posts: 6,736 ✭✭✭

    I think they've done a great job on the paged mode, but I think it should allow the columns to get wider before it splits them.  I don't known how they determine what's too wide, perhaps there could be a control for those who prefer a wider column.  The max size seems narrower than a book (relative to the font size), and the corresponding minimum column size is too narrow for my tastes.

    Here are three examples in Paged, Reading Mode (fullscreen) on my 1280x1024 monitor:

    This is the widest the columns get before splitting.  I think most books allow more words per line than this, but that's a gut feeling.

    image

     

    This is when I've just moved the ToC separator over by 1 notch from the previous, and it is the smallest that the columns get (too narrow for my taste):

    image

    This is how it looks without the ToC:

    image

    I'd really like to be able to control column size (and maybe margin size--although the margins do look good here, I'd prefer only two columns and that would mean wider columns and maybe wider margins). Other than that, I think the Paged mode is really cool.

    MacBook Pro (2019), ThinkPad E540

  • Todd Phillips
    Todd Phillips Member Posts: 6,736 ✭✭✭

    I also like that you do not have to use the "reading view" to use the "paged view"!

    Great

    Yes!

    MacBook Pro (2019), ThinkPad E540

  • Friedrich
    Friedrich Member, MVP Posts: 4,772

    what the heck???????  How'd I miss 4.2?  No wonder you all were quiet today . . . dangit!  [:@]

    [:P]

    I like Apples.  Especially Honeycrisp.

  • Simon’s Brother
    Simon’s Brother Member Posts: 6,816 ✭✭✭

    I'd really like to be able to control column size (and maybe margin size--although the margins do look good here, I'd prefer only two columns and that would mean wider columns and maybe wider margins). Other than that, I think the Paged mode is really cool.

    In reading view on a wide screen monitor I can't get down to two columns even at 80% program scaling.  It's only when the panel is less than full screen width that I can get it down to two columns wide.

  • Mark Smith
    Mark Smith Member, MVP Posts: 11,790 ✭✭✭

    I do like this feature. It will help with scanning articles as well as reading them.

    Pastor, North Park Baptist Church

    Bridgeport, CT USA

  • Rosie Perera
    Rosie Perera Member Posts: 26,202 ✭✭✭✭✭

    Cool! I'm downloading it now. At first I thought this was another thread pulling our legs (all of us who are beta addicts); it seemed too soon to expect 4.2 beta after 4.1 shipped.

  • Mark Smith
    Mark Smith Member, MVP Posts: 11,790 ✭✭✭

    I have one suggestion/request for this feature. Please have Page Up and Page Down move us just one column to the right or left. That way I can place the columns I want to look at at the same time on the page. Right now the way a resource opens determines where the 'page break' goes and that isn't always where I'd prefer. Revealing/hiding one new column with each Page Up/Page Down would work around that.

    Pastor, North Park Baptist Church

    Bridgeport, CT USA

  • TCBlack
    TCBlack Member Posts: 10,978

    Hmm...   I don't know Mark.  Part of me agrees that a single column advance might work, but I would prefer that the arrow key would do that, while Page up/down would still advance the entire page.

    Hmm Sarcasm is my love language. Obviously I love you. 

  • Lynden O. Williams
    Lynden O. Williams Member, MVP Posts: 8,973 ✭✭✭

    Like the column view. When I paste into word 2007, from the print command, I lose the two column view. Is this by design, or am I doing something wrong? If I select some text and ask it to copy using the copy command from the tool menu, It does not retain the two column view.

    Mission: To serve God as He desires.

  • TCBlack
    TCBlack Member Posts: 10,978

    I also like that you do not have to use the "reading view" to use the "paged view"!

    I concur!  I'm so grateful for that, it enables me to read with a word processor open on the same screen now.

    Hmm Sarcasm is my love language. Obviously I love you. 

  • Mark Smith
    Mark Smith Member, MVP Posts: 11,790 ✭✭✭

     Part of me agrees that a single column advance might work, but I would prefer that the arrow key would do that,

    The left and right arrow keys control parallel resource cycling, so wouldn't work on resources for which there is a parallel resource association. Maybe another key combo? Anyway they want to implement it, I'd like to be able to move a column at a time through a resource.

    Pastor, North Park Baptist Church

    Bridgeport, CT USA

  • TCBlack
    TCBlack Member Posts: 10,978

     Part of me agrees that a single column advance might work, but I would prefer that the arrow key would do that,

    The left and right arrow keys control parallel resource cycling, so wouldn't work on resources for which there is a parallel resource association. Maybe another key combo? Anyway they want to implement it, I'd like to be able to move a column at a time through a resource.

    What about the up and down arrow keys?  A quick test on mine with four columns looks like it moves three columns.  Turn that down to just one and we'd have a winner. No?

    Hmm Sarcasm is my love language. Obviously I love you. 

  • Mark Smith
    Mark Smith Member, MVP Posts: 11,790 ✭✭✭

    What about the up and down arrow keys?  A quick test on mine with four columns looks like it moves three columns.

    HMM, in mine it moves a whole page, just the same as Page Up/Page Down.

    Pastor, North Park Baptist Church

    Bridgeport, CT USA

  • TCBlack
    TCBlack Member Posts: 10,978

    Hmm Sarcasm is my love language. Obviously I love you. 

  • Mark Smith
    Mark Smith Member, MVP Posts: 11,790 ✭✭✭

    Pastor, North Park Baptist Church

    Bridgeport, CT USA

  • Bob Pritchett
    Bob Pritchett Member, Logos Employee Posts: 2,280

    I think they've done a great job on the paged mode, but I think it should allow the columns to get wider before it splits them.  I don't known how they determine what's too wide, perhaps there could be a control for those who prefer a wider column.  The max size seems narrower than a book (relative to the font size), and the corresponding minimum column size is too narrow for my tastes.

    We wanted to keep the UI as uncluttered as possible, so instead of letting (or making) you choose a number of columns, we try to do it "automagically." We are optimizing for 10 words per line, (obviously a few more when there's extra space, etc.) which published research indicates is the optimal width for reading.

    Yes, that's narrower than many (but not all!) books. But wider than newspapers! :-)

  • Todd Phillips
    Todd Phillips Member Posts: 6,736 ✭✭✭

    I think they've done a great job on the paged mode, but I think it should allow the columns to get wider before it splits them.  I don't known how they determine what's too wide, perhaps there could be a control for those who prefer a wider column.  The max size seems narrower than a book (relative to the font size), and the corresponding minimum column size is too narrow for my tastes.

    We wanted to keep the UI as uncluttered as possible, so instead of letting (or making) you choose a number of columns, we try to do it "automagically." We are optimizing for 10 words per line, (obviously a few more when there's extra space, etc.) which published research indicates is the optimal width for reading.

    Yes, that's narrower than many (but not all!) books. But wider than newspapers! :-)

    I like the "automagically", but I'd also like a slider to let me adjust the target width of the column...similar to the font size slider.  The problem with 10 words per line is that it's the maximum, but in most cases it's less than that.

    MacBook Pro (2019), ThinkPad E540

  • spitzerpl
    spitzerpl Member Posts: 4,998

    Hmm...   I don't know Mark.  Part of me agrees that a single column advance might work, but I would prefer that the arrow key would do that, while Page up/down would still advance the entire page.

    If Logos moves to an "advance 1 column" option I would want to see it animated in some way. to simply have column 2 replace column 1 and add column 3 would confuse my simple mind, even if I knew that is what would happen by hitting a particular key. I can understand where it would be helpful. Sometimes you want to be able to see two texts together on the same page and not allowing column shifting could mean you have to keep bouncing back between two pages because you need column 2 and column 3. But I would want the columns to "slide" into place...I know, picky.

  • spitzerpl
    spitzerpl Member Posts: 4,998

    I forgot to say one thing in my previous post. I absolutely love the automagically rendered columns. I absolutely love that it is not limited to reading view and that I can float a window and have the columns. I ran into a bit of a problem getting the reading view on my second monitor so I just floated the window. I knew it would be a feature I appreciated but I have started to do much more "through a book" reading in Logos and I didn't realize how much the experience was going to improve with multiple columns. If some kind of tweaking of the automagically rendered column widths was provided I would want it to be a universally set item in Program settings. Maybe a slider with more words on one side and less words on the other.

    When I want to read I don't want to give my mind the distraction of "oh yeah, I can adjust these columns till there just right." I would rather not have the option so my mind isn't distracted by the option.

    Have I mentioned I love the multi-columns? As simple of a thing as it is I would put it as a better enhancement then even printing. I use Logos to read, not print, and though I have found the printing feature very handy...I love the multi columns.

    I'm very excited about the multi-columns. In fact I need to improve the wireless signal in the church office so that I can have a good connection between my IPod Touch and my computer. I have an app called Air Mouse which allows excellent and complete control of my laptop. I'm looking forward to sitting back with my little Ipod in my hand and reading and highlighting away.

    Now Logos can get to work putting fine print footnotes at the bottom of the columns and making the columns full justified :-)

    EDIT: Just wanted to add that I am giddy with excitement over multi-columns.

  • Robert Pavich
    Robert Pavich Member Posts: 5,685 ✭✭✭

    Major league giddy here also....this is A GREAT feature!!!

    Robert Pavich

    For help go to the Wiki: http://wiki.logos.com/Table_of_Contents__

  • Bohuslav Wojnar
    Bohuslav Wojnar Member Posts: 3,466

    I am also happy to see the long awaited column view. I have no time to play with it right now (we have a mission's conference) but good job Logos [Y]

    Bohuslav

  • Robert Pavich
    Robert Pavich Member Posts: 5,685 ✭✭✭

    It WOULD be nice if there were a global "use page view for all bibles" sort of thing....

    Robert Pavich

    For help go to the Wiki: http://wiki.logos.com/Table_of_Contents__

  • Graham Criddle
    Graham Criddle Member, MVP Posts: 32,436 ✭✭✭

     

    HMM, in mine it moves a whole page, just the same as Page Up/Page Down.

    Same here - up/down arrow does the same as pageup/pagedown

    Tested with 6 columns and 3 with the pane docked or floating.

    I agree it would be nice to move with a finer granularity than a page but I really do like this feature!

    Graham

  • Ebbe Andréasson
    Ebbe Andréasson Member Posts: 720 ✭✭

    I think this a great feature. I like it much more than I could imagine when I read the suggestion time ago.

    It WOULD be nice if there were a global "use page view for all bibles" sort of thing....

    Maybe, but Logos remembers your settings and open resources in the same way as last time. I think that's enough.

  • spitzerpl
    spitzerpl Member Posts: 4,998

    Maybe, but Logos remembers your settings and open resources in the same way as last time. I think that's enough.

    Agreed. When I am reading through a chapter or large section I will probably always use columned paging. However when I am researching a passage I would rather have the scroll bar visible. That being said an auto feature would be nice. The auto-feature would switch from multi-column to scroll bar setting automatically when there is only room for 1 column.

  • PL
    PL Member Posts: 2,134 ✭✭✭

    Thank you Logos for such a nice implementation of the Paged View.  Here is my feedback:

    1. You may want to move the Paged View option in the menu to the same group as Reading View.  As it stands now it sits in an awkward place on its own.  There are already a lot of one-off menu items each in its own group with a separator line.

    2. I agree that there should be a global setting to make Paged View my default for all windows.  Alternatively, we can make Reading View (F11) automatically switch to Paged View (why would anyone want to read something with words stringed 13 or 20 inches across the screen?)

    3. I suggest changing the name of this option.  To me the multi-column nature of this feature is much more prominent than the fact that the user-unfriendly scrollbar is no longer there.  Maybe call it "Multi-Column View" instead? (To be honest, I rarely use the scrollbar because it scrolls over the entire book or Bible, and I almost always overshoot.  If I need to go to another part of the book, I use the table of content.) 

    4. Consider adding optional buttons or page-turn curls for easier page turns.  Currently you either have to use the Page Up / Down buttons on the keyboard (they are small on my netbook and hard to reach on standard keyboards), or reach for the tiny up/down arrows on the upper right hand corner.  I envision having either page-forward/page-back (triangles) buttons or page curls that appear on the window's lower right and left corners when you hover your mouse to those corners.  Similar to Amazon.com's "Look Inside" view or Kindle for PC app.

    5. The feature seems to determine the number of columns based on the font size selection.  This works great for the English resources I've tried.  However, for some reason, the Chinese Union Version Bible had always displayed in this huge default font size.  I always have to set it to the small font size for it not to visually overwhelm all the other resources.  Because of that, Paged View seems to create too many narrow columns for this particular resource, making it hard to read to say the least, and confusing when reading poetry sections of the Bible.  Screen shot below.

    image

    (BTW, has anyone looked at a Bible in Paged View with the bottom Interlinear pane turned on?  It's a beautiful thing!  Thanks again Logos!)

    Peter

    EDIT: One simple way to fix the Chinese Bible problem is to set the internal "automagical" column width factor differently for Chinese resources.  Instead of 10 words per line, set it to 15 or 18.  That will make the CUV behave correctly in Paged View.

  • Simon
    Simon Member Posts: 218 ✭✭

    Nice feature!

    I would like to see an option to change text alignment to "justify" (that is wat MS Word calls it). Now the collumns are left-aligned, and the right side of the collumn is "jumpy". I would like to see straight collumns, just like most newspapers and books have.

  • Ron
    Ron Member Posts: 1,229

    making the columns full justified :-)

    Nice feature!

    I would like to see an option to change text alignment to "justify" (that is wat MS Word calls it). Now the collumns are left-aligned, and the right side of the collumn is "jumpy". I would like to see straight collumns, just like most newspapers and books have.

    +1 I'd like to see full-justified columns (or at least an option for them)

    Fantastic feature though!

This discussion has been closed.