The excitement/confusion/frustration over Logos 4 has been quite impressive. A sale rep told me (as I was upgrading to Platinum) that Bob reads every one of our posts. Bob, you are a trooper if indeed to read everything, especially for this week! Thanks for when you dip into the conversation with a clarification or explanation.
As an early adopter (sometimes only at heart) I don't necessarily mind the extensive download/install/index time and learning curve of a new piece of software like Logos 4. It's fun trying to figure it out and if that fails reading or posting to the forum to get help. However, this forum is very inefficient; questions are asked multiple times and answered in a variety of ways many helpful and others not so helpful. Questions can get buried quickly and people with good answers to them might not notice the inquiry.
It seems to me that a user-edited wiki site would be a lot better. It could start with the text of the help file and we could expand it as people gain more experience with the new version. Also, when questions are asked on the forum replies could include links to wiki article(s); this would save some of the more active forum members a great deal of time. I image we would have many volunteers to help moderate the site on a volunteer basis.
Logos could dip into the wiki for the best articles to fold back into the help files, probably saving them money on technical writing.
With all this said, I don't know what the costs involved in setting up a wiki would be for Logos... heaven knows they are busy trying to keep up with the fervor incited this week by the release. If Google Wave were more mainstream it would be fairly easy for
users to set up their own wiki-like set of articles and resources, however not enough people in the Logos community have access (I assume) for it to be helpful. Anyway I digress...
So, dear forum readers, am I alone in my desire for a wiki? Is it a good idea or bad? Reply and let Logos know what you think.