voting with my wallet

I trust that you all had a Merry Christmas. I praise the Lord for Logos4 and amazing team behind it. They truly proved that they listen to their users, love the Lord and know "their (coding) stuff." I am glad to have chosen to install and use L4 on a daily basis.
Despite of these things, I chose to NOT participate in recent sales (they are very attractive) because I am concerned about a disconnect in priorities of users and LOGOS team.
I get the feeling that 2011 was the "Year of Marketing" at Logos, while it could have been the year when it finally achieved parity with Libronix as of it's Missing Features. Promises were made. Year came and gone.
Even Uservoice platform was underutilized and maybe completely forgotten. As I see today, the only 2 official responses on Top requests were updated over a year and 6 months ago respectively. [*-)]
It seems to me that the future is going to bring more of what we have seen in 2011, UNLESS we speak the only language businesses understand.
There is no official commitment on the promises made 2 years ago, while a huge marketing tide is sweeping across the userbase. I am glad for the terrific resource deals, but Logos was originally made as a Bible Study tool. Little quirks and details in note-taking activities, Searching, slow loading, having to right-click instead of double-clicking in RI, foreign language issues, Library interface, hiding of unnecessary resources, are often a hindrance than help.
I view purchasing resources from Logos as a way to support THEM and their vision. Sure, I can spend $2500 and get a $1000 credit, but this year, I am voting with my wallet to see program improvements that are important to users.
Comments
-
toughski said:
I get the feeling that 2011 was the "Year of Marketing" at Logos, while it could have been the year when it finally achieved parity with Libronix as of it's Missing Features. Promises were made. Year came and gone.
Understand frustration. Initial port of Libronix 3 to Mac OS X was announced, followed by shipping many, many months later. Logos for Mac version 1 lacked many features in Libronix 3. Logos 4 Mac offers substantially more, with amazing progress over couple years; yet Logos 4 Mac does not yet have complete feature parity with PC. Logos 4.5 Beta has many improvements and some bugginess to fix before a stable release would be ready.
Suspect many in Logos share anguish about not getting more done this year, yet many improvements have been delivered on a variety of platforms.
Thankful for many friendly forum discussions, including passionate sharing of desire for Logos resources and software improvements.
toughski said:Even Uservoice platform was underutilized and maybe completely forgotten. As I see today, the only 2 official responses on Top requests were updated over a year and 6 months ago respectively.
[Y] Concur updating Logos User Voice suggestion status would be appreciated, especially for ones already in progress.
Personally Thankful for Logos 4.3 shipping Personal Book tool this year; currently compiling a public domain Bible without chapter and verse numbers that has tagging for right click use in Logos 4 and can be included in a link set for scrolling.
Likewise looking forward to Logos 4.5 stable release and concurrent mobile app updates for cross platform sync of reading plans, highlighting, notes, ... that many Logos users, including Bob Pritchett (CEO) are anxiously awaiting. Implementing data replication for quick propagation across platforms is technically challenging (daunting), yet Information Technology is rapidly moving to cloud computing.
toughski said:Despite of these things, I chose to NOT participate in recent sales (they are very attractive) because I am concerned about a disconnect in priorities of users and LOGOS team.
Concur expanding Logos availability and usability on many devices has impacted completion of feature migration/implementation on one platform due to needing cross platform integration vs narrow focus on one platform. Thankful Libronix 3 and Logos 4 can be used simultaneously on Windows. In contrast, many Logos users have more than one electronic device so having Logos on many platforms is awesome. Considering history of computing devices, I would be much more concerned if Logos was narrowly focused on one platform. With millions of devices being sold annually, glad can freely use Logos on many of them.
toughski said:I view purchasing resources from Logos as a way to support THEM and their vision. Sure, I can spend $2500 and get a $1000 credit, but this year, I am voting with my wallet to see program improvements that are important to users.
Concur purchasing resources from Logos helps support the company and resource publishers financially. Also aware a bargain is not a bargain if cannot use it.
Thankful for awesome Christmas credit and collection deals; personally pondering and praying about purchase. Looking at Christmas 2011 Masters collection content, noticing many resources would like to read and use. Thankful for many free Vyrso resources this month. [8-|]
Logos is hiring plus opening a Developer Office in Phoenix => http://blog.logos.com/2011/12/logos-opens-phoenix-development-office/ that should expand Logos development team plus attract talent who will not move to Bellingham, WA (too cloudy for much of the year). For year round bicycle riding, summer in Bellingham and winter in Phoenix is very attractive. Logos has had developer opportunities open for over a year, which is also impacting ability to complete promised features.
Keep Smiling [:)]
0 -
toughski said:
I praise the Lord for Logos4 and amazing team behind it. They truly proved that they listen to their users, love the Lord and know "their (coding) stuff." I am glad to have chosen to install and use L4 on a daily basis.
Despite of these things, I chose to NOT participate in recent sales (they are very attractive) because I am concerned about a disconnect in priorities of users and LOGOS team.
Which is it? Do they listen to their users or is there a disconnect? Personally, I feel that Logos has made tremendous strides in L4Mac this year.
macOS, iOS & iPadOS |Logs| Install
Choose Truth Over Tribe | Become a Joyful Outsider!0 -
toughski said:
Listening and doing aren't always the same thing, unfortunately...
What I keep seeing again and again in the forums are differences of opinion that boil down to how much progress one believes Logos can make in a given period of time. T. C., myself and some others who have many years in IT look at the development cycle and design decisions and expect slow progress. Others are convinced that throwing more resources at the project would speed things up ... while others think it would make no difference or perhaps even slow down progress. And there are those who feel betrayed by the slack of communication when new features slide, and those who simply want it and want it now - feeling that they have been patient long enough.
What all of the above positions forget is that the programming and testing simply takes as long as it takes given the state of the code, the skill of the programmers and the usefulness of their tools. Management may (a) pressure them (b) release before they think its ready or (c) fire them. But we really ought to spend a bit more time appreciating the crew in the trenches working their tails off (there's proof - none of them have tails other than as part of their hair style). Some of them popup in the forums now and then trying to help us, usually when we are at our most frustrated and irritable times. But come on, let's cut them a break and say
Thank you, Logos development staff. Merry Christmas. Happy New Year.
(and, boy, are we looking forward to our next goodies[;)])
Orthodox Bishop Alfeyev: "To be a theologian means to have experience of a personal encounter with God through prayer and worship."; Orthodox proverb: "We know where the Church is, we do not know where it is not."
0 -
Amen! I have found Logos working pretty good for me so far. Also I appreciate the Logos credit this month, they did not have to do that. I think the desktop application keeps improving. I remember when I did not have Logos in school, it makes me much more appreciative.
Blessings,
Philana
0 -
I find all of this negativity about the Christmas sales incredibly disappointing. Logos have every right to market and sell their products how they see fit.
PIE for one have been incredibly blessed this sale season. Living overseas means huge postal costs (it is cheaper to have books shipped from the US than buy books on sale here in Australia) so to receive a good discount and not have to pay shipping is a blessing.
I understand not everyone can afford to buy stuff but why is that Logos' fault?
So, to Bob and Dan, my sales guy Caleb and whoever is involved in this sale, thank you. I have been able to build my pastoral library into quite a decent looking collection.
0 -
MJ. Smith said:
What all of the above positions forget is that the programming and testing simply takes as long as it takes given the state of the code, the skill of the programmers and the usefulness of their tools. Management may (a) pressure them (b) release before they think its ready or (c) fire them
MJ, I am not a programmer, (elementary G W BASIC) hows that for old school, but I have seen programmers at work, and have taught myself basic html, and know the frustration of trying to get something to work.
I too have my wish list, but I know they are patiently working. If it is rushed and released too soon (bugs) then users say they rushed the code, if it is put through its paces, then users say they taking too long. The programmers are between the Devil and the deep blue sea.
When we bear in mind that the engine is free, we should not complain about the cost of the resources. If I cannot afford it, I move on or wait patiently for a sale. How many companies allow you to use multiple devices with syncing (in beta) at no cost.
Mission: To serve God as He desires.
0 -
Christmas in my tribe was wonderful this year. There was very little of that materialism stuff and whole lots of family, friends, fellowship and food. It was good, old-fashioned memory making. There were plenty of moments to sit quietly in wonderment.toughski said:I trust that you all had a Merry Christmas.
toughski said:Despite of these things, I chose to NOT participate in recent sales (they are very attractive) because I am concerned about a disconnect in priorities of users and LOGOS team.
Perhaps Logos went all-out in a sales push to raise enough revenue to press forward with the development you so earnestly desire. I don't really know. It was brought to our attention many of the Bible add-ons had their prices dropped to $10. I strongly encourage you to get any of those Bible versions you need. It will show Logos you approve of the new pricing and possibly encourage more of it.
We have heard whispers of "something BIG" coming. I do believe Logos is still committed to delivering on the features it has promised us. One thing I have always believed is; it will definitely take longer than any of us (Logos included) expect it to take. There may even be a couple features that have to wait until L5 or L6. I am thinking of Hebrew pronunciation here. I figure we will get it when we get it.
In 2011:
- We have seen many of our resources make it to handheld devices.
- The Logos Wiki has really matured. (With a lot of help from that undercover MVP Steve Clark.)
- We saw Vyrso launch.
- Proclaim is actively being tested by a number of churches.
- Lots of new Logos training materials have appeared from Logos, Morris Proctor Seminars, John Fallahee, and that amazing Mark Barnes fellow.
- Several video series have also been produced helping us learn Greek, Hebrew, Discourse Analysis and even the I-Beam of preaching.
- Andrew Jones has helped Logos address the need for Catholic study materials and the organizing of appropriate resources.
- MJ is helping with Catholics4Logos.
- Logos employees now have Chai Tea at work. (For how long, only Dan can say.)
- We received a gift of the Perseus Collections for FREE!
- We actually have a working "Personal Book Builder" feature in Logos 4.
- Our Logos account has a Wish List.
- Our Logos account can display credit.
- The sales focus has gone from what they think you want to asking "What do you want?"
- Community Pricing titles typically graduate at $1 to $3 per book, and rather quickly, I might add.
- Logos decided to open a Phoenix office amidst the Grand Canyon, the Painted Desert, the Petrified Forest, and a quick flight from Area 51.
- added in light of Denise's post below: Logos has really made advancements on the Mac side of things. Enough so that I run L4 on both the Windows and Mac operating systems and I am reasonably content. [8-|]
I could go on but that is enough to convince me. I am better off today in my Logos world than I was this time last year. My wallet opens it's mouth with a big grin and screams "Yes! Logos, You're doin' fine!"
Logos 7 Collectors Edition
0 -
Well, this thread REALLY bugs me. I've been using the BEST BIBLE SOFTWARE (Libronix3 of course) for five years!!
Now, the poster wants Logos4 to catch up. And (I guess) not have so many sales too.
But more seriously (so MJ won't ding me again), I do use the Windows version of L4 and have my gripes. But each time I see happy iPad people or all-those-brands I can't remember users, or even the Mac (some of whose users you really feel for), I'm happy for them. Trying to get so many platforms stable must really be a pain. I have to assume Bob's really biting his tougue periodically and 'reading James up a storm!'.
I'm really happy too that Logos is pursuing the presentation software. Our church isn't in the ballpark, but the idea is just unbelievable (what will eventually be possible). Just unbelievable.
"If myth is ideology in narrative form, then scholarship is myth with footnotes." B. Lincolm 1999.
0 -
MJ. Smith said:
Thank you, Logos development staff. Merry Christmas. Happy New Year.
(and, boy, are we looking forward to our next goodies
)
[Y] Plus Thanks to entire Logos company; Thankful for interaction with many employees. [:D]
My appreciation for high quality Logos resources with tagging has grown while compiling and comparing a public domain Bible without chapter and verse numbers. A public domain text source has numerous typographical errors compared to the Logos resource.
Keep Smiling [:)]
0 -
ST, that mouser looks suspiciously like he's trafficing in yen. And no Japanese interlinear either (or Japanese for that matter).
"If myth is ideology in narrative form, then scholarship is myth with footnotes." B. Lincolm 1999.
0 -
Denise Barnhart said:
ST, that mouser looks suspiciously like he's trafficing in yen. And no Japanese interlinear either (or Japanese for that matter).
I honestly chose him specifically for You. No kidding. And I knew you would catch that and hoped you would mention it. (Thanks. for doing so.) Now maybe Bob Pritchet will go for the pile of Yen and deliver Japanese Bibles in Logos 4.
Logos 7 Collectors Edition
0 -
Thank you!!! We have japanese at church that would really benefit from Logos.
"If myth is ideology in narrative form, then scholarship is myth with footnotes." B. Lincolm 1999.
0 -
Denise Barnhart said:
Thank you!!! We have japanese at church that would really benefit from Logos.
And there are 127 million Japanese in Japan who could use Logos. Almost all of them read, all the time. Less than 3 million claim to be Christian in the broadest definition.
( I would point out Wikipedia's 99% literacy rate for Japan as important but Wikipedia also lists the USA as being 99% literate, which casts doubt on the reliability of Wiki's other claims in the article. Maybe all the illiterate Americans live in my neighborhood.)
Logos 7 Collectors Edition
0 -
Super Tramp said:
( I would point out Wikipedia's 99% literacy rate for Japan as important but Wikipedia also lists the USA as being 99% literate, which casts doubt on the reliability of Wiki's other claims in the article. Maybe all the illiterate Americans live in my neighborhood.)
No, I've seen a number of them in various areas of the country. [:'(] They try to tell us that they need more money for education, but some of the districts which spend the most on education have the lowest literacy rates. Also, I went to a grade school that had the treds in the steps worn concave from the feet of all those who had used them in the history of the school and I went to the same high school my mother attended which looked as though it hadn't seen much in the way of improvement since that time, but we got a better education than is acquired by most students today. They complain about teachers' salaries being too low, but I would say they are too high for the "benefit" society receives for their services. If they don't like the pay, go into another line of work.
george
gfsomselיְמֵי־שְׁנוֹתֵינוּ בָהֶם שִׁבְעִים שָׁנָה וְאִם בִּגְבוּרֹת שְׁמוֹנִים שָׁנָה וְרָהְבָּם עָמָל וָאָוֶן
0 -
George Somsel said:
They complain about teachers' salaries being too low
Oh, please, George, don't go there....... Teachers are like Preachers and Prison Guards; they really don't do it for the money. They do it for the excitement! [:S]
The funding thrown at public education rarely makes it's way down to the classroom teacher and students. Most is siphoned off by top brass, politicians and construction companies who know how to rig bids. Returning control to the local community (parents & taxpayers) is the sane thing to do.
Now why did i bother to answer your post? I know better! [:$]
Logos 7 Collectors Edition
0 -
Super Tramp said:
The funding thrown at public education rarely makes it's way down to the classroom teacher and students. Most is siphoned off by top brass, politicians and construction companies who know how to rig bids. Returning control to the local community (parents & taxpayers) is the sane thing to do.
While I am quick to note that expense per child does not correlate closely with quality of outcome, your cynicism does not match most of my experience.
Orthodox Bishop Alfeyev: "To be a theologian means to have experience of a personal encounter with God through prayer and worship."; Orthodox proverb: "We know where the Church is, we do not know where it is not."
0 -
MJ. Smith said:Super Tramp said:
The funding thrown at public education rarely makes it's way down to the classroom teacher and students. Most is siphoned off by top brass, politicians and construction companies who know how to rig bids. Returning control to the local community (parents & taxpayers) is the sane thing to do.
While I am quick to note that expense per child does not correlate closely with quality of outcome, your cynicism does not match most of my experience.
I am basing my opinion on much that I have seen throughout the years plus clips that I saw of teachers in Wisconsin leading children in protest. They are not interested in educating students, and I would have summarily fired each and every one who participated in that fiasco—if necessary, I would find an excuse that would stick to get rid of them.
george
gfsomselיְמֵי־שְׁנוֹתֵינוּ בָהֶם שִׁבְעִים שָׁנָה וְאִם בִּגְבוּרֹת שְׁמוֹנִים שָׁנָה וְרָהְבָּם עָמָל וָאָוֶן
0 -
I voted with my wallet too. I bought something.
0 -
While I read all of your replies, it honestly failed to address any of the concerns that I was highlighting:
- MOST L4 users want program optimization, in terms of speed and responsiveness
- Number 2 priority for L4 users was languishing for years, with no recent comment from the leadership (in contrast to CONSTANT word from Dan about some new marketing ploy)
- Since ST brought up PB - I am grateful it finally came out, but I would not call it a finished product as it woefully lacks compared to PPB of Libronix in terms of supporting international users.
- I understand that programming takes time and any of time estimates should be treated with a grain of salt. I normally double the time estimate given and think it is very generous. (by the way, I am simply amazed what can be accomplished with $10000 and 2 days - has anyone seen Restaurant Impossible?) However, Sermon File Addon is a freebie, while those other projects make a ton of cash, so does this make it allright to go back on your word, time and time again?
- While it is nice to have wish lists, Perseus, freebies on Vyrso, Proclaim, bla-bla-bla, it was not the priority of users when
Logos4 first rolled out - feature parity with Libronix was. Yes, a large percentage of it has been achieved but there are numerous things still missing. LOGOS, let's get this done!
0 -
0
-
toughski said:
Number 2 priority for L4 users was languishing for years, with no recent comment from the leadership (in contrast to CONSTANT word from Dan about some new marketing ploy)
Don't expect responses from Dan regarding programming—it's not his field.
toughski said:I understand that programming takes time and any of time estimates should be treated with a grain of salt. I normally double the time estimate given and think it is very generous. (by the way, I am simply amazed what can be accomplished with $10000 and 2 days - has anyone seen Restaurant Impossible?) However, Sermon File Addon is a freebie, while those other projects make a ton of cash, so does this make it allright to go back on your word, time and time again?
While sermon file add-ins don't affect me, many have made numerous requests regarding this.
toughski said:While it is nice to have wish lists, Perseus, freebies on Vyrso, Proclaim, bla-bla-bla, it was not the priority of users when Logos4 first rolled out - feature parity with Libronix was. Yes, a large percentage of it has been achieved but there are numerous things still missing. LOGOS, let's get this done!
Wishlists are another item which have been frequently mentioned.
george
gfsomselיְמֵי־שְׁנוֹתֵינוּ בָהֶם שִׁבְעִים שָׁנָה וְאִם בִּגְבוּרֹת שְׁמוֹנִים שָׁנָה וְרָהְבָּם עָמָל וָאָוֶן
0 -
MJ. Smith said:
While I am quick to note that expense per child does not correlate closely with quality of outcome, your cynicism does not match most of my experience.
Some kids are going to succeed no matter what the oppressive government schools do to try and stifle them. [6] But there is "return on investment" and then there is Return On Investment. Samuel Blumenfeld points out. "You have to go to school to become a functional illiterate." (from Why Johnny Can't Read) The only goal the PTA has is to assure your child is a little more average than their child is.
The ROI ratio is much better when the parent directs how their child's education is constructed. My missionary parents home schooled their 5 children at least half of our education. Three got masters degrees and all of us excelled in our fields. Total tuition and books for all of us to graduate was less than one public school student, for one year, in a third class school; the kind of school that claims success with a graduating class average score of 13 on the ACT. That isn't cynicism, it is educational malpractice. If a Doctor, Lawyer or Airliner performed like that, we would sue them! Ever since Horace Mann took over the teacher's colleges we have had inferiority by design. I want to go back to Comenius and Luther. Having Logos resources will greatly help parents give their children a superior education at a fraction of the cost. I may be right, or maybe it is just the cynic in me, talking out of turn.[:^)]
Logos 7 Collectors Edition
0 -
I hear ya toughski
0 -
Joshua G said:
I voted with my wallet too. I bought something.
My wallet screamed like a banshee! A happy Banshee.
Really this was the closest I have ever come to buying an election. Ka-Ching![8]
Don't worry toughski, I bought enough for the both of us.
Logos 7 Collectors Edition
0 -
toughski said:
While I read all of your replies, it honestly failed to address any of the concerns that I was highlighting:
So you want more perspective on the details rather than the big picture which is usually my forte?
toughski said:MOST L4 users want program optimization, in terms of speed and responsiveness
True, and this is an area in which we have seen continuous progress.
toughski said:Number 2 priority for L4 users was languishing for years, with no recent comment from the leadership (in contrast to CONSTANT word from Dan about some new marketing ploy)
The reworking of notes was not something that Logos originally scheduled.[;)] Logos and the users have to recognize that the delaying of promised features (e.g. PBB and sermons) for reworking of unsatisfactory features is even more a balancing act than the original scheduling of features. Any choice by Logos is going to tick some group off. And we have made some progress - compact view, more tagging options (in beta), sort ...
But I will also say that Logos is the only forums that I have used that expect Logos to give us regular progress reports. I do not share that expectation.
toughski said:PB - I am grateful it finally came out, but I would not call it a finished product as it woefully lacks compared to PPB of Libronix in terms of supporting international users.
I see it as having some important advantages, especially treatment as a fully functional resources, and some disadvantages (I would prefer an HTML or native XML approach). I have run into some difficulties in Chinese and Sogdian but generally find it to function with most languages that MS handles decently. Some of the non-English problems (such as Russian citations) are the result of the expanded capabilities and expectations. I, too, consider it unfinished because of the resource formats it does not yet support - some of which are very important to me. And yes, there are a number of formatting options where L3 exceeds L4. But the formatting issues are the result of some core, fundamental, early design structure. Logos made a reasonable decision based on the information available at the time - they cannot be faulted for the choice. Unfortunately, MS again had a gap between intent and reality.
Please don't join into the cry asking for it NOW rather than asking for it to be RIGHT. It only delays Logos in giving us what we truly need.
toughski said:I am simply amazed what can be accomplished with $10000 and 2 days
How much can be achieved depends upon a solid foundation and a well thought out plan and people who know how to execute the plan.
toughski said:However, Sermon File Addon is a freebie, while those other projects make a ton of cash, so does this make it allright to go back on your word, time and time again?
I don't have a clue what you are talking about. There is no evidence that Logos has understaffed the Logos 4 development although some segments of the company clearly had additional development staff positions that could not be filled (evidence: Phoenix office). Questions can be raised regarding the design phase and the testing phase based upon what one sees in the delivered product ... but that has to do with the selected development cycle model not allocation of resources.
toughski said:While it is nice to have wish lists, Perseus, freebies on Vyrso, Proclaim, bla-bla-bla, it was not the priority of users when
Logos4 first rolled out - feature parity with Libronix was. Yes, a large percentage of it has been achieved but there are numerous things still missing. LOGOS, let's get this done!Bob P. consistently states that these use separate staff i.e. I addressed this specifically when questioning that additional staff would shorten the timelines.
Orthodox Bishop Alfeyev: "To be a theologian means to have experience of a personal encounter with God through prayer and worship."; Orthodox proverb: "We know where the Church is, we do not know where it is not."
0 -
toughski said:
Really now, If we all leave there will only be you and maybe Shawn. Then Logos might think the thread is just two guys complaining. At least when the Piranha are thrashing in the waters everybody stops to take a look. Commotion is good for your thread's publicity.
Next time George has an opinion, slap it! (The opinion, not George.) Then your thread will bounce back up to the top where Bob Pritchett might get to notice it. That is after all why we keep George around. [:D]
Logos 7 Collectors Edition
0 -
Super Tramp said:
The ROI ratio is much better when the parent directs how their child's education is constructed.
That is very dependent upon the parents and the children - and the values of the community to which they belong. However, in these forums our only relevant criteria should be:
- can they read Logos resources (English, Spanish, Hebrew, Aramaic, Syriac, Coptic, Ugarit, Latin, Greek) additional languages required to present as "beyond basic education"?
- can they navigate an intuitive computer interface in at least 3 operating systems, root a Nook, set up a home wi-fi ...?
- can they engage in argument/logical proofs in at least 5 different logical systems including Jewish and classical Aristotlean .. and at least two Asian systems to present as "beyond basic education"?
- can they hold a conversation on their cell phone, drink a double dry cappuccino and enter a passage in the Go box simultaneously?
- finally - can they identify resources that are not in any collection and do not appear on any of the Guides?
The Bonus qualification: do they meet all Logos requirements for a senior developer who would manage to sneak my favorite bug-fixes and features into new releases and convince Logos of the obvious - my priorities are the right priorities.[H]
Orthodox Bishop Alfeyev: "To be a theologian means to have experience of a personal encounter with God through prayer and worship."; Orthodox proverb: "We know where the Church is, we do not know where it is not."
0 -
Super Tramp said:
Next time George has an opinion, slap it! (The opinion, not George.) Then your thread will bounce back up to the top where Bob Pritchett might get to notice it. That is after all why we keep George around.
It's nice to know that I serve a useful function, even though a negative one. [;)]
george
gfsomselיְמֵי־שְׁנוֹתֵינוּ בָהֶם שִׁבְעִים שָׁנָה וְאִם בִּגְבוּרֹת שְׁמוֹנִים שָׁנָה וְרָהְבָּם עָמָל וָאָוֶן
0 -
Logos 7 Collectors Edition
0 -
toughski said:
MOST L4 users want program optimization, in terms of speed and responsiveness
Logos User Voice has a generic suggestion => Focus on Code/Performance Optimization with 902 votes (# 1 in voting)
plus a specific optimization request => Improve Logos 4 Menu Responsiveness with 24 votes (my top performance wish for Logos 4 on Mac and PC)
Looking forward to awesome Logos improvements on many platforms that ship as soon as they are ready to use; release note pages show many Logos 4 releases over couple years => Logos 4 Release Notes , Logos 4 Beta Release Notes , and Mac Release Notes and History
Couple months ago, Logos 4 Mac forum had a lively thread => Dear Bob Pritchett, may I have a moment of your time? with a reply from Bob Pritchett that included => http://community.logos.com/forums/p/40084/299243.aspx#299243
Bob Pritchett said:I'm also very sorry for your frustration with the Mac. I confess to being frustrated with the Mac, too. For many years we were able to dedicate all our development resources to one monopolistic platform. Imperfect as it was, it meant we only had to code, optimize, and bug-fix one platform.
Then Steve Jobs had to go and make the Mac amazing, run circles around Windows, and then create a phone that finally made mobile apps feasible. This provoked Google into building their own phone platform and drumming up a lot of support, too.
So now I have to develop Logos Bible Software -- which was mature and finally stabilizing on Windows -- on three more platforms. So every new feature needs to be implemented on four platforms (with UI coded in completely different languages! -- C#, Objective C, and Java) and things keep shaking up with new releases of the OS that change screen size (hello, iPad! Android tablets!) and behavior. (Lion, iOS 5, Honeycomb, etc.)
:-)
From a technical perspective, wondering about Logos 4 migration from 32 bit to 64 bit, which may include shipping 64 bit Mac version long before Windows because Mac OS X can run 64 bit applications in all supported OS X versions.
toughski said:I understand that programming takes time and any of time estimates should be treated with a grain of salt. I normally double the time estimate given and think it is very generous.
Whether doubling time estimate is generous depends on complexity of tasks and surprises encountered along the way.
toughski said:While it is nice to have wish lists, Perseus, freebies on Vyrso, Proclaim, bla-bla-bla, it was not the priority of users when
Logos4 first rolled out - feature parity with Libronix was. Yes, a large percentage of it has been achieved but there are numerous things still missing. LOGOS, let's get this done!Logos 4 shipped in 2009, which is before Apple announced an iPad in April 2010. An article with smartphone market share over 5 years in US shows business incentive for iOS mobile app development earlier than Android => http://www.engadget.com/2011/12/14/shocker-android-grew-us-market-share-after-q2-ios-was-static/ (from a developer perspective, iOS eco-structure offers more profitable reasons to write code)
Earlier this year, many Logos 4 users with Android phones were passionately clamoring to use Logos resources, including comments wondering what was taking Logos so long. Logos posted Android app is coming in Nov 2010; Android Alpha release was publically shipped over 6 months later, which took a lot more than $ 10,000 and 2 days to accomplish.
Currently many Logos 4 users with smartphones and tablets are passionately clamoring for reading plans, highlighting, and notes to sync quickly between Logos 4 and their mobile devices. Knowing data replication has potential for awful stuff (deletion and needless duplication readily come to mind), personally hoping Logos ships Sync v2 framework for cross platform use when ready to handle user volume, both current, and hopefully expanding user community.
Keep Smiling [:)]
0 -
I have really hesitated about posting anything after the lengthy Black Friday marketing issues. But although I don't agree with a lot of what toughski has said, I have some points of agreement.
I have been pleased with Logos as a program and the products they have produced. I would not at all label Logos as "intuitive", and I think a lot of folks would agree with that. But it is nonetheless an awesome program, and it is worthwhile taking the time and effort to learn. I have not experienced any difficulties with its performance on my platform, but it must be amazingly frustrating to those who do, or who are waiting for specific parity issues or developments.
We all have our priorities and it must indeed be difficult to meet even the majority of expectations. There have been a significant number of what I feel are "distractions" to what Logos has stated in the past to be their primary mission. Logos seems to want to become all things to all people, to be involved in all kinds of different arms of development. I understand that separate divisions have been involved, but it does represent a division of focus. Would it be great if Logos could branch off into "this" or "that"? Yeah, sure. But there is maturity that comes in recognizing one's strengths and developing those strengths, rather than being involved in a hundred different things. Mature pastors, as in other fields of life, recognize that. And from my perspective, Logos has lost its focus and is diversifying onto too many paths. But that's their choice, and my opinion is only one of many perspectives, and it's THEIR business not mine. Its not a public company. If they enjoy the idea of such diversification, surely they have a right to do so.
I also feel that Logos has the right to offer whatever sales it wants to offer, and that I don't have a right to grumble that what I might particularly want isn't on sale.
Where it does seem Logos has really changed is in the area of marketing. And it HAS just gone berzerko this past year. That in itself is an issue of mild concern... but the nature of that marketing has become the major issue in my eyes. I don't want to open up previous discussions in this issue... it bothers some, and not others... and some feel that reflects a level of discernment or lack thereof among Logos' users. In general, I was pleased to see at least some sensitivity appear in the pricing wording which I think may have stemmed from our discussions at Thanksgiving. I thank Logos for listening to that extent. But some of the issues remain.
I am really surprised that no one, in the glow of the Christmas sales, has stopped to point out an illustration of these concerns. In Vyrso, for example, we had the Twelve Days of Vyrso. How was that advertised? It was promoted as 12 days of special 24-hour deals, that if not purchased, would expire at the end of each 24-hour period. If you didn't purchase the special during that time, you were out of luck, so if you wanted that special, you needed to act upon it. I'm sure many people bought those 24-hour deals based on those parameters. At the same time, it was advertised, "Check back on Christmas Day for another special deal".
Well, i did. And what was the special deal? "Oh, guess what? All those 24-hour deals that we said were going to only be available for those 24-hours? Oh, we were just kidding! You can get them all until Jan. 2!! Aren't we kind and generous???"
I'm sorry. I don't mean to be rude. i really don't. i even think it was well intentioned. But if you advertise that someone should buy something because the offer is only good for 24 hours, and that it will not be available after that point, and then later announce that it isn't actually so, that it will actually be available for an extended period of time after all... and most importantly... you knew that you were going to extend that time when you told people that it would only be good for 24 hours, please tell me, how is that not lying???? How is that not manipulative and dishonest?? Maybe I'm really missing something here, and if so, I apologize. But I would never accept that from my kids. From my spouse. From my pastor... as anything less than a lie designed to manipulate me. And I don't think most others on here would either. Yes, even Bob has said that all advertising is "manipulation". But does it have to be dishonest manipulation? I am not arguing this point because I ordered something and got burned (Vyrso has very very little of any interest to me, and such products are not the reason I got involved with Logos... Many of the "freebies" were free anyway -- all the time -- from other vendors, so even if I did have an interest, I wasn't particularly excited about the "deals"...and the fact that I can "search" through an Amish romance with the full power of my Logos library seems kind of a silly reason to make such a purchase or download to me... you can do it, but why in the world would you want to or need to??? But that's just my take, and its okay for others to think otherwise. We each have our reading/study styles, and there's no place for passing judgment on such things.).
But the reason i am raising this issue is just because it demonstrates a growing disregard for truth in speech and truth in advertising that some of us have seen over the past year. And if most of the folks on these forums can't see that, then I really don't know what to say. You either get it or you don't.
Yes, okay, we have been told (here in the forums) by many well-intentioned folks that Logos is not a "Christian" company. That there are no such things. Only people are Christians. That's mere semantics. We use such terminology all the time, and legitimately. We talk about "Christian" books, for example. Well, gee, books can't be Christians, so by such an argument, there is no such thing as a "Christian" book. Please. It is "Christian" because it espouses Christian themes or principles. Let's not play games with language to try to prove our perspectives, when we wouldn't consistently apply the same logic to the rest of our lives or language use. Language means what it means, and we all use the term "Christian" in this (acceptable) fashion. When a company claims that it has as its vision to operate under Christian principles, it rightly comes under scrutiny for the extent that it conforms to those claims... all the more so because such a claim of operating under such principles/integrity is a drawing card for one's business. To say later that such examination is not justified because there is no such thing as a "Christian" company is specious, as the company itself, by making such claims, has invited such evaluation. And Logos does a GREAT DEAL more than most other companies that reflects their Christian commitment. I commend them sincerely for that. And their intentions.
You can argue that Logos is not doing anything more than wise, prevalent marketing techniques. I and others have claimed that is not the standard to which we should uphold. Even (as Denise wisely pointed out in the past) "secular" companies recognize the importance of their integrity, so I won't claim that our standards should be higher than the world's (I think they should be, but there is no need to make that judgment in this context). But the bottom of Logos's emails ask for feedback, citing the verse from Scripture about the importance of one's reputation, and people speaking well of you. I have no doubt that the extensive marketing hype has led to a great increase in sales, $ that I am confident Logos will use for its further development and in addressing the dreams/desires we all have for its development. But even in these forums, which include mostly Logos' fans and generally heavy users, we have heard significant grumbling about these marketing developments. What you DON'T have as much of an opportunity to hear, is an answer to another question... how many sales or customers have been lost or are gradually disconnecting from Logos as a result of this development? I can not provide statistics as no one can, but anecdotally, I am hearing about a lot... and I have a very, very small circle... I really feel that Logos is significantly damaging its reputation.
And that concerns me... because I love Logos, its product, and the people behind it. But I want to be able to trust Logos when a sales person tells me something. I don't feel that I can do that anymore. I don't feel that I can trust an offer to be honest... golly, I don't feel anymore that I can trust Logos' advertisements not to lie to me. I don't even feel all that comfortable about this end of season "private sale"... so much hype... its so BIG. REALLY BIG... according to Dan. What is it? Call us and talk with us. We'll spend time with you. We'll talk about your needs. Tell us what you want to buy, and we'll tell you the very best price we can offer that to you.
Ummm... Logos (at least in my experience)... has ALWAYS done that. That's why so many have said its always wisest to call a rep to get the best prices/deals. So unless I'm missing something (truly, maybe I am) this "kinder, gentler Logos" that is being presented in the blog posting really sounds a lot like smoke and mirrors to me to encourage just a bit more buying before the end of the year.
And I hate that. Not that they are making this "offer". But because I have become so cynical.
2011 has indeed been the Year of Marketing. My New Year's resolution is that I have turned off all avenues of marketing, and will no longer participate in Logos sales. I have only a few resources I still would like to purchase from Logos, and I think I can probably figure out how to do that.
Without the hype.
0 -
EmileB said:
I have really hesitated about posting anything after the lengthy Black Friday marketing issues. But although I don't agree with a lot of what toughski has said, I have some points of agreement.
There is one huge problem with what you say—you're too cryptic. You need to flesh out your thoughts a bit more. How am I supposed to understand your point when you never complete the discussion? [;)]
george
gfsomselיְמֵי־שְׁנוֹתֵינוּ בָהֶם שִׁבְעִים שָׁנָה וְאִם בִּגְבוּרֹת שְׁמוֹנִים שָׁנָה וְרָהְבָּם עָמָל וָאָוֶן
0 -
EmileB, the most frustrating thing to me is that we are absolutely powerless to do anything about it. We are the minority. I'm a 13 year customer but I've learned I'll get dogpiled if I question the sales methods of Logos, so I stay quiet most of the time.
0 -
Emile ... that was very well thought out and written as well. Makes one think.
Personally I agree completely. But I also notice the before/after of my own personal 'response'. 'Before' I had what I thought was a solid group of books and I was pretty happy with those books. 'After' I have a whole lot MORE books and have learned a whole lot MORE (I do read them!).
So, yes, there is a cynicism as to how much is sincere (Christian). Versus how much is 'smoke'.
When Dan goes to sleep each night (and that IS who we're discussing), is he happy he's 'tricked' me into buying a lot more books? Or is he happy he showed me books I should already have been reading?
I guess in the end, I'm the one who buys the books and make the decisions. I feel quite lucky in that regard.
"If myth is ideology in narrative form, then scholarship is myth with footnotes." B. Lincolm 1999.
0 -
EmileB said:
And that concerns me... because I love Logos, its product, and the people behind it. But I want to be able to trust Logos when a sales person tells me something. I don't feel that I can do that anymore.
Having worked in sales for a number of years I suspect that this is currently just as much of a struggle for Logos as it is for their customers. Dan has already indicated that things are changing, I just think that it will be a while before it all makes sense.
God Bless
Graham
Pastor - NTCOG Basingstoke
0 -
Hiya Denise!
Thanks for your kindly response. I'm really not trying to question Dan's heart in the least. i hope and pray he does sleep well. Logos is a very fine company, he should be proud of what he and his family have built, and I like your perspective of "showing me things I should already have been reading." That is the essence of good marketing, in my opinion.
But I don't think anyone is really thinking much about the methodology being used at all, actually (I know Bob says they think a lot about those things, but I really don't know...). 'Cse if someone IS thinking it through... that would concern me a whole lot more if this is the result that they are coming up with. So I really want to give Logos the benefit of the doubt here. But there must be a way to engage in marketing (let's call it publicity) with the goal stated above in mind... a method that is a win-win for customer and company... without the types of misleading and dishonest hype that we've been seeing (and some recent examples of pure untruths). Its just not necessary. Logos has a great product. A fine collection of valuable resources. A innovative business model. A superb staff. There just isn't a need to stoop to such an approach. and I truly think it's really going to hurt the company in the end... and of course, us as users as well. And you're right that we're the ones who buy the books and make the decisions... but that is true only as long as those decisions can be made/evaluated based upon true information. If that information is somewhat less than forthright... or worse, misleading... then the making of good stewardship decisions becomes quite difficult.
And Shawn, you have my sympathies. It does often seem that those with what they feel is a genuine concern can often get "dogpiled" at times out of a sense of folks' appreciation and loyalty to Logos (I haven't personally experienced that... people have been generally very kind and patient with my lengthy epistles!... but I've seen it happen to others. I'm sorry. It must be frustrating). And that also isn't necessary. Logos' best friends are those who care enough to raise their concerns, not those who won't evaluate the bad with the good (i.e., a "fanboy" response). It is out of love for the company and a desire for its success that we raise our concerns.
I don't really need many more resources, or, therefore, a lot of sales. I slowly have been acquiring the last of what I want. And I'm happy that newer folks are getting a similar chance to amass their libraries to that which we were given in the beginning of our run with Logos (there HAVE been some awesome Christmas deals out there for such folks). As a long-term user like you (Logos 2.0 days... with well into a five-figure investment over the years), its hard to see the changes. Some of those have been good... there have been many that were necessary. And lately, there have been some others that have been painful to see. And as a result of these, I really feel that Logos' reputation for integrity is taking a significant hit. Which is the last thing that the good folks at Logos would want or intend.
0 -
Shawn Drewett said:
EmileB, the most frustrating thing to me is that we are absolutely powerless to do anything about it. We are the minority. I'm a 13 year customer but I've learned I'll get dogpiled if I question the sales methods of Logos, so I stay quiet most of the time.
Hi Shawn
I appreciate how you feel but sometimes we need to keep speaking in the face of adversity!
God Bless
Graham
Pastor - NTCOG Basingstoke
0 -
[At the risk of being "dogpiled"...]
Emile and Toughski,
Thank you for your thoughtful comments. I agree with your viewpoints and am glad that you had articulated a lot of how I've been feeling towards Logos and its recent marketing push.
I hope Dan and Bob are reading these comments.
For me personally, I'm feeling more and more disengaged from Logos' marketing push because:
1. I already have reading materials that will last me several lifetimes. Would I like to get another big set of commentaries at an insanely low price? Sure, but I'm already having so much to read when preparing for sermon or Sunday School that I always run out of time to prepare, run out of time to preach/teach, and run out of time to pray. [I'm a lay person with a full-time job in IT.]
So unless my life circumstances / status change (e.g. going to seminary full-time), I don't see myself investing a whole lot more in Logos resources. I have enough already, for now.
2. I don't typically spend more than $50-100 at a brick-and-mortar bookstore. In the same way, unless it's something I need (e.g. for a class), I don't normally "bite" unless an item is discounted deeply into the teens (as in community pricing, which I'll get to).
3. On the point of trust raised by Emile, I myself find it most disturbing that the pricing of these e-resources seem to be manipulated almost arbitrarily "just to move the goods." Let me explain. When a resource comes out of community pricing into retail pricing, it's price usually jumps 2-, 3-, or even 10-fold and stays there. And then when there's a need to boost sales, the price of the same item can come down drastically, until the appointed end date of the sale, then the item jumps back to full retail.
We are told the community pricing is the break-even point that allows Logos to produce the resource without losing money. From that I gather that the mark-up between CP price and retail price is pure profit. I could be wrong. Because the mark-up is so steep, Logos then has a lot of leeway to adjust the price during "sales" to get us to buy stuff.
This bothers me a lot, and it feels like the margin on these resources are so high that Logos has the freedom to constantly manipulate those prices to make it appear that things are on "sale" to push people to spend money.
4. I'm also with Toughski that even though people spending money on Logos resources will ultimately benefit and expedite the software development cycle, it just seems to be a significant imbalance between the frequent, all-out, all-channels, aggressive marketing messages coming out of Logos vs. the very slow progress of some missing/broken features such as Sync, which has been in the works for a year now.
In summary, to earn back the trust, I would like to see Logos:
- Tone down the volume on the marketing messages, and check thoroughly for truthfulness and the tone of the message (e.g. avoid overdoing the "more is better!" messaging)
- Allow users to better control what type of marketing messages they want to receive (e.g. segment by newer users in library-building mode, vs. longer-term users whose libraries are approaching fullness and are only interested in true, deep bargains, etc.)
- Reassess the overall pricing strategy - perhaps if everything is priced much lower - closer to cost - maybe people will actually buy more and buy more frequently? (e.g. Apps in the Apple app store priced less than $10 and selling like hot cakes)
- Evaluate the possibility of more coordinated and formal status reporting of highly anticipated product features (such as Sync / highlights / notes on mobile) - rather than Bob occasionally dropping into these forums to explain his own frustration and constraints or the lead developer occasionally dropping a hint here or there.
Thanks for listening.
Peter
0 -
Without dog-piling or making anyone feel their opinions don't count, here are a few real-world facts that trump most feelings.
It takes money to keep development rolling.
Money comes from sales. If not from you, then someone else.
If you won't buy a book for $1 Logos must produce something new (and profitable.)
Be happy you have everything you want. Many (Fred Morgan comes to mind) have been waiting for YEARS and still don't see their desired resources even hinted at. It took decades for Logos to publish Catholic works in earnest. Calvin 500 Collection only came out recently. Imagine how the Calvinists, Anabaptists, Catholics and Pentecostals would feel if Logos dropped all production of new resources because you have your plate full.
To require Logos to cease profit-seeking activities and magically guess what resources you want (for less than $1 per volume,) and then, and only then, contact you with this offering.... Well that is just plain selfish. There are others who want Proclaim. There are readers who like Vyrso books. Many use their Androids and iPads more than their computers. Fred Morgan is still waiting for Anabaptist works..
The Sci-Fi movie Metropolis depicts an enslaved population toiling underground for the sole benefit of the leisure class living topside. If the Logos developers, scanners, text entry, book keepers, and sales would only work for nothing, then Logos could give me what they owe me without all that greedy sales stuff.[:@]
[*-)] Thanks for letting me vent, at nobody in particular.
Logos 7 Collectors Edition
0 -
0
-
I'm sorry for your frustration.
At the risk of re-hashing what's been said here already:
We pay a lot of attention to UserVoice, and have resolved many issues posted there.
However, some of the most popular items are difficult to respond to or address specifically.
1) Focus on Code/Performance Optimization
Well, we've been doing that constantly. 4.3, 4.5 (releasing soon), and every release before those. We've made huge progress on this internally, and on specific features. In other cases we're blocked by constraints of design or platform or architecture. Can I close this case? Or just leave it up forever -- because it'll never be finished.
2) Rework notes function - in one or multiple phases
This is a massive laundry-list of one user's requests that many people have voted for. But is every person really voting for every point? Do we have to do 100% of this list? How do we even respond -- itemized answers on every point? Only the important ones? Which ones are important?
UserVoice is designed to vote issues up in priority, so it works best if each issue is a separate point.
We certainly have been reading this list, and we've been doing what the title says all year -- sync v2 and the merger of notes, highlighting are two incredibly important things that address performance, improve mobile access, and, literally, "rework notes function - in one or multiple phases." This has been consuming many team members for months and is nearly ready to ship.
But how will we close this case and stop getting criticized for "ignoring the top issues"? Because we simply aren't doing, haven't promised, and don't even agree with the wisdom of many of the items on this long list.
(If someone wants to break these out into separate issues, we can respond individually and see how each issue gets voted up/down.)
Personal Books -- I think the Logos 4 implementation is vastly superior to the one in Logos 3. Is the issue simply support for auto-parsing Bible references in non-English text?
Sermon File -- I need to open a separate thread on this. Because, based on our analysis of what was uploaded to Sermon File in Logos 3, and the complaints/concerns/issues with it, we believe that Personal Books is often a better solution, and that when it's not the new solution will be a new web site that we haven't coded yet. We're not sure there's any place for a wiki-syntax based sermon uploading tool that works inside Logos 4. So this isn't so much a delayed feature as a retired/re-directed feature. But I'm open to feedback on this.
That's why it isn't done, though -- it's not a "port" to Logos 4, it's possibly a different project, or no project at all. (I'm short on time tonight, but will follow up on this.)
I appreciate the feedback, and have read this and related threads. And I agree, our marketing team has kicked into high gear and maybe the message load has been overwhelming. But I just don't see the evidence that we've been ignoring user requests, or "go[ing] back on [our] word, time and time again." We've knocked a huge amount of stuff off the list at "Features Coming Soon to Logos 4" while delivering continual improvements in performance, multiple platform support, and even freebies like Perseus.
And sometimes, even with the best of intentions, plans change. (The world changes; there was no iPad when Logos 4 came out!) Every feature that was in Logos 3 is not, in my mind, a sacred contract to deliver in Logos 4 and every future version. Products change; features are introduced and retired. Things comes up. For that matter, I'm not sure I even remember anymore how we got in this situation where people feel Logos 4 has to deliver every single thing Logos 3 did. (I think we got there because there was so much "missing" in the initial release of 4, so we made a projection of when it would be there.)
I'm open to resetting the discussion of "what's missing and needs to be done", and I'm happy to talk openly about the plans and schedule for those features. It's probably also time -- 2 years after Logos 4 shipped -- to talk about what things aren't going to be done and why.
How about a series of threads titled "Missing: Feature x..." where we can discuss them one on one?
0 -
Bob Pritchett said:
This is a massive laundry-list of one user's requests that many people have voted for. But is every person really voting for every point? Do we have to do 100% of this list? How do we even respond -- itemized answers on every point? Only the important ones? Which ones are important?
Untrue Bob. This is one user putting together a list of everything someone had asked for whether or not the person compiling the list believed it to be a practical idea. It was done solely because a number of forum users including the compiler of the list believed that you just didn't get it in terms of the dissatisfaction with notes. If you still describe the request in this way, you still don't get it - notes do not permit users to do what they need to be able to do with notes. And when the do work, their performance is terrible - it had been improved but has degraded in the latest beta.
<self-censored remarks of frustration / annoyance to be added by the readers' imagination>
Bob Pritchett said:(If someone wants to break these out into separate issues, we can respond individually and see how each issue gets voted up/down.)
Most of the suggestions already also exist as individual items. And, yes, in a post prior to yours, I did give you credit for progress made.
Orthodox Bishop Alfeyev: "To be a theologian means to have experience of a personal encounter with God through prayer and worship."; Orthodox proverb: "We know where the Church is, we do not know where it is not."
0 -
MJ. Smith said:
<self-censored remarks of frustration / annoyance to be added by the readers' imagination>
Tsk, tsk, MJ. I heard that ! [:$]
george
gfsomselיְמֵי־שְׁנוֹתֵינוּ בָהֶם שִׁבְעִים שָׁנָה וְאִם בִּגְבוּרֹת שְׁמוֹנִים שָׁנָה וְרָהְבָּם עָמָל וָאָוֶן
0 -
Bob Pritchett said:
Is the issue simply support for auto-parsing Bible references in non-English text?
Not for me in that I have lost the ability to make timelines, harmonies and lectionaries that I had in L3. While I have not tested in the lastest beta, there have been continuing reports of problems with some scripts - Cambodian, if I recall correctly.
Bob Pritchett said:So this isn't so much a delayed feature as a retired/re-directed feature
This is the first indication I've had that the feature is not coming ... after two years of seeing it listed as forthcoming. If its functions were critical to me, I would feel betrayed. I'd heard that it was dependent on the PB, I heard it was dependent on a new web site, but I hadn't heard it might disappear. I would expect most people who use the feature to have little interest in the website side - there is metadata/search information that preachers find useful.
Orthodox Bishop Alfeyev: "To be a theologian means to have experience of a personal encounter with God through prayer and worship."; Orthodox proverb: "We know where the Church is, we do not know where it is not."
0 -
Notes, Notes? Did somebody say NOTES?MJ. Smith said:notes
Coming in 2012 to an L4 machine near you. Caveat: sometimes people do leak misinformation.
Logos 7 Collectors Edition
0 -
Wow, Bob, talk about a jaw-dropper. MJ's been carrying a lot of water for Logos (you). Not much else to say.
"If myth is ideology in narrative form, then scholarship is myth with footnotes." B. Lincolm 1999.
0 -
Denise Barnhart said:
Wow, Bob, talk about a jaw-dropper. MJ's been carrying a lot of water for Logos (you). Not much else to say.
Oh, it has paid off royally. A lot of what MJ has asked for has become reality.
Now, if only we can get MJ to push for Japanese in Logos 4. I see she is helping the Cambodians.
Logos 7 Collectors Edition
0 -
Bob Pritchett said:
We pay a lot of attention to
UserVoice, and have resolved many issues posted there.Many things have been done. However, it is a matter of communication. When a
button says "planned" but "updated OVER 1
year ago" (emphasis mine) it looks neglected. I will address other
comments on SFA in a separate thread.Bob Pritchett said:1) Focus on Code/Performance Optimization
Well, we've been doing that constantly. 4.3, 4.5 (releasing soon), and every
release before those. We've made huge progress on this internally, and on
specific features. In other cases we're blocked by constraints of design or
platform or architecture. Can I close this case? Or just leave it up forever --
because it'll never be finished.Am glad you commented on this. I
think it is time we allow 905 votes to be re-allocated to note.., um, to other
worthwhile issues with the understanding that performance optimization would be
an ongoing concern for LOGOS, since it obviously is for users … forever.Bob Pritchett said:2) Rework notes function - in one or multiple phases
This is a massive laundry-list of one user's requests that many people have
voted for. But is every person really voting for every point? Do we have to do
100% of this list? How do we even respond -- itemized answers on every point?
Only the important ones? Which ones are important?UserVoice is designed to vote issues up in priority, so it works best if
each issue is a separate point.We certainly have been reading this list, and we've been doing what the
title says all year -- sync v2 and the merger of notes, highlighting are two
incredibly important things that address performance, improve mobile access,
and, literally, "rework notes function - in one or multiple phases."
This has been consuming many team members for months and is nearly ready to
ship.But how will we close this case and stop getting criticized for
"ignoring the top issues"? Because we simply aren't doing, haven't
promised, and don't even agree with the wisdom of many of the items on this
long list.Bob, I think you are NOT “reading” this idea right. This idea shows that
user-created content is important (perhaps the most important, because it is irreplaceable),
but is treated by L4 as a second-class citizen.Bob Pritchett said:(If someone wants to break these out into separate issues, we can respond
individually and see how each issue gets voted up/down.)Ummm, United we stand, divided we fall. I would only be willing to split
this idea into separate points with a firm commitment of Logos to address these
new issues FIRST (in their new order of priority, as voted by users), and
before any other issues, since collectively they gathered the most support.I also think that Uservoice system is flawed: it gives more exposure to early-submitted
ideas. If someone has a really brilliant idea now, it is not even going to be
on a radar screen. Plus, most people already spent their votes, and, as a
passive system, Uservoice does not encourage voters to reassess issues.Bob Pritchett said:Personal Books -- I think the Logos 4
implementation is vastly superior to the one in Logos 3. Is the issue simply
support for auto-parsing Bible references in non-English text?In short, yes. Logos 4 implementation does NOT support for auto-parsing
Bible references in non-English text, so the end result is that we don't have a
working PB for most of the world. I would like to address this item in a
separate thread.Bob Pritchett said:Sermon File -- I need to open a
separate thread on thisagreed, let's discuss it.
0 -
MJ. Smith said:
<self-censored remarks of frustration / annoyance to be added by the readers' imagination>
My earlier message was written in haste, and it's probably too defensive. I'm sorry, and I apologize for mischaracterizing the list.as one person's requests.
I do think it would be helpful if it was returned to split out items, though, so we could respond (and see priority) on the items as individual -- or at least tightly grouped by function -- units.
0