Thoughts regarding library storage: online vs. local storage

Douglas Tews
Douglas Tews Member Posts: 1 ✭✭
edited November 21 in English Forum

I was initially very disappointed with this first release of the iPhone software. Regrettably, the fact it requires an internet connection to access one's library renders it nearly useless to me.  For myself, the majority of places I would have found it most useful have neither WiFi nor a reliable cell data network available.

So for the moment, I had no choice but to buy the NIV, Notes, and Commentary via Olive Tree for the iPhone. (At least it didn't cost much.)

I was at least encouraged to see comments in another thread that this is a known issue for many and it its being worked on. I do truly appreciate all the logistical issues Logos must deal with. To that end, I have a couple observations and suggestions:

First, regarding the purchase of resources a second time for the iPhone:  This is not unreasonable. If I want a bible permanently in my home, and a second bible for my cabin up north, I need to buy two...right?

It is true that for software, many companies allow their products to be simultaneously installed on two machines, thus accommodating both a desktop and laptop computer. However, whether some companies like Zondervan are that forward thinking remains to be seen.

In the meantime, may I propose a partial solution? First, there's nothing wrong with the present centralized server concept...as long as an internet connection is available. It would be nice however, to have the option of buying second copies of selected resources for local storage on one's iPhone.

I suspect there are many, like myself, who do not require their ENTIRE Logos resource library to be available AT ALL TIMES. Some people might not even wish to have ALL their resources on their phone because of storage space limitations. Therefore, a mixed system of both local and server located resources would likely serve many just fine.

For myself, if I had the NIV Bible, NIV notes,  NIV commentary plus my personal notes (sync-able) in local storage, that would take care of 99% of my mobile needs. I'd also be willing to pay for those resources a second time, if necessary.

As to what percentage of one's library to have in local storage would be up to each individual and their needs. As to whether these resources need to be repurchased would depend on the originating company's licensing policies. Logos may have to charge a second time for some titles, but not for others.

Conclusion: The sooner our resources are available for local storage (paid again or not) the better.

In the meantime, I'll have to use Olive Tree for much of my mobile use. However, I do intend to use the Logos iPhone software as well, to become familiar with it and hopefully provide some constructive feedback as it develops.  I do look forward to the time when Logos will be my "one-stop" solution! Keep up the good work!...Big Smile

Tagged:

Comments

  • spitzerpl
    spitzerpl Member Posts: 4,998

    I can understand what you are saying about paying twice for resources, but I would prefer to see What Logos is able to do over the course of 6 months about bringing more content to the Iphone/touch without paying twice :-)

  • Ted Hans
    Ted Hans MVP Posts: 3,171


    I can understand what you are saying about paying twice for resources, but I would prefer to see What Logos is able to do over the course of 6 months about bringing more content to the Iphone/touch without paying twice :-)


    I agree Philip, i am not sure of the paying twice concept.

    Ted

    Dell, studio XPS 7100, Ram 8GB, 64 - bit Operating System, AMD Phenom(mt) IIX6 1055T Processor 2.80 GHZ

  • Amy Leung
    Amy Leung Member Posts: 406 ✭✭

    I definately would not be paying twice; I've already paid twice, three or more times for many books it's not making sense...  [:(]

    But I'm more than obliged to pay for a Logos app that has off-line storage, as I really appreciate the good work from Logos.  Somewhat like paying for the Mac engine.  So what about a free app with online access only, and a paid app with offline books storage?

     

  • Philip Gurgel
    Philip Gurgel Member Posts: 76 ✭✭

    I like your thinking Amy.  That makes a lot of sense.  A lot of the apps in the Itunes store are like that, with the free "light version" and the more complete and useful "full version".

    I would absolutely pay for the ability to store my books on my Ipod assuming I could choose the books that I wanted (NIV, Book of Concord, NA27, BDAG, BHS, BDB etc.).

    I was so excited when the app came out, but I have hardly used it since because most of the books that I frequently use are simply not available.  Until they become available, the app is pretty much useless to me even when I have wireless internet.