Nazareth not tagged as a Biblical Place in Luke 1:26

Graham Criddle

As the screenshot below shows, the word "Nazareth" in Luke 1:26 isn't tagged as a place

However, the word "town" (four to the left) is tagged as a place (and actually as Nazareth)

Looking at a BWS for Nazareth and the "referred to as" section it shows this difference clearly

Is this simply a tagging error or is there something deeper here?

Thanks, Graham

Find more posts tagged with

Comments

NB.Mick

Graham,

I'm no linguist, but from reading the verse, to me it seems the town is a place, whereas "Nazareth" is a name.

Maybe Sean will weigh in...

Mick

Graham Criddle

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/431092#Comment_431092

Hi Mick

Graham,

I'm no linguist, but from reading the verse, to me it seems the town is a place, whereas "Nazareth" is a name.

Maybe Sean will weigh in...

Mick

That could explain it, thanks.

It looks as though one of the benefits of the new tools is I might end up looking more closely at what the text actually says and how it is structured!

Graham

Dave Hooton

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/431101#Comment_431101

Hi Mick

Graham,

I'm no linguist, but from reading the verse, to me it seems the town is a place, whereas "Nazareth" is a name.

Maybe Sean will weigh in...

Mick

That could explain it, thanks.