Wrong Reference in WBC Commentary on Luke 18-24, Vol 35C

Under The Last Supper (22:14–20) of this resource, under Form/Structure/Setting (page 1042), there is a mistaken reference to John 9:1-5 instead of Didache 9:1-5:
"A huge scholarly investment has been made in examining the different forms in which the institution has been preserved (Matt 26:26–29; Mark 14:22–25; 1 Cor 11:23–26; and cf. 1 Cor 10:16–17; John 13–17; 6:25–59; Did 9:1–5; Justin Martyr Apol 1.66.3);"
John Nolland, vol. 35C, Luke 18:35–24:53, Word Biblical Commentary, 1042 (Dallas: Word, Incorporated, 1998)."
Comments
-
Looks like they forgot to tag the 'Did'; shows up in Libronix as well.
"If myth is ideology in narrative form, then scholarship is myth with footnotes." B. Lincolm 1999.
0 -
Brian Lopez said:
Under The Last Supper (22:14–20) of this resource, under Form/Structure/Setting (page 1042), there is a mistaken reference to John 9:1-5 instead of Didache 9:1-5:
"A huge scholarly investment has been made in examining the different forms in which the institution has been preserved (Matt 26:26–29; Mark 14:22–25; 1 Cor 11:23–26; and cf. 1 Cor 10:16–17; John 13–17; 6:25–59; Did 9:1–5; Justin Martyr Apol 1.66.3);"
John Nolland, vol. 35C, Luke 18:35–24:53, Word Biblical Commentary, 1042 (Dallas: Word, Incorporated, 1998)."
I concur that it is wrongly tagged. Now for the $64 question: Did you report it as a typo?
george
gfsomselיְמֵי־שְׁנוֹתֵינוּ בָהֶם שִׁבְעִים שָׁנָה וְאִם בִּגְבוּרֹת שְׁמוֹנִים שָׁנָה וְרָהְבָּם עָמָל וָאָוֶן
0 -
No, I did not report it as a typo because it's not a typo, it's a wrong reference. You cannot mistype a reference to the Didache into John 9:1-5.
0 -
Brian Lopez said:
No, I did not report it as a typo because it's not a typo, it's a wrong reference. You cannot mistype a reference to the Didache into John 9:1-5.
I generally report such errors as typos. There is a section in the Typos report for comments. You can highlight the error there.
0 -
Yes, will do so. Thanks.
0 -