bug: logos books are showing up as a pb in a search

I was doing some reading on the "day of Preparation" I did a search on this phrase, and this is what L5 returned. Noticed that the NRSV and NKJV both showed up under the personal book section. When I tried to open them to the matches, L5 tells me "loading" and doesn't do anything after that.

Here is my screen print:

And here is my logs: 1680.Logos.log

FYI...I can reproduce this bug at will.

FYI(2)...both of them also show up in the library section, and they both work when I click on the arrow to see the phrase that I was searching.

Find more posts tagged with

Comments

Jack Caviness

Search results displayed correctly in L5 Mac 5.0b SR-1.

Graham Criddle

Hi Tom

I was doing some reading on the "day of Preparation" I did a search on this phrase, and this is what L5 returned. Noticed that the NRSV and NKJV both showed up under the personal book section.

Looks strange[:)]

If you execute the command "rebuild personal book index" does that change things at all?

Graham

tom

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/465263#Comment_465263

Hi Tom

I was doing some reading on the "day of Preparation" I did a search on this phrase, and this is what L5 returned. Noticed that the NRSV and NKJV both showed up under the personal book section.

Looks strange

If you execute the command "rebuild personal book index" does that change things at all?

Graham

Thanks Graham, that did corrected the issue. But the question is. 'how did this happened in the first place?'

Bradley Grainger (Logos)

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/465446#Comment_465446

But the question is. 'how did this happened in the first place?'

There was a bug (in the 4.5 Beta timeframe IIRC) that incorrectly classified books when indexing them. Perhaps it's possible that these Bibles were included in the PB index in a buggy beta and have been carried forward ever since then?

tom

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/465486#Comment_465486

But the question is. 'how did this happened in the first place?'

There was a bug (in the 4.5 Beta timeframe IIRC) that incorrectly classified books when indexing them. Perhaps it's possible that these Bibles were included in the PB index in a buggy beta and have been carried forward ever since then?

Sounds good to me. Thanks Bradley