Will this be incorporated for 4.6c?
Whilst it cannot be compiled, I found that 4.6c wouldn't even recognise a Harmony compiled in v5.1 -- "too new" message in the log! Which makes me wonder if it would apply to any book compiled in v5.1?
Support for compiling lectionaries and harmonies is only in Logos 5.1.
4.6c Beta 2 will be able to read resources compiled by 5.1; this should fix the "too new" error.
that's great!
Support for compiling lectionaries and harmonies is only in Logos 5.1. 4.6c Beta 2 will be able to read resources compiled by 5.1; this should fix the "too new" error.
4.6c B2 is doing nothing with the compiled file.
0508.Logos4Indexer.log
The log file appears to indicate that the indexer successfully discovered PBB:abc97407df044ea3a4ee771049c17f58, which I assume was the resource compiled under 5.1?
What happens if you enter that resource ID in the 4.6c Beta 2 command bar?
The log file appears to indicate that the indexer successfully discovered PBB:abc97407df044ea3a4ee771049c17f58,
Correct. But it will not index & it does not appear in Library. It was compiled as a Harmony from the sample Lectionary and Harmony docx provided in Beta 1.
I deleted the Personal Book Index and scanned this file from W:\PBB, but it was not indexed. So I deleted the file from Resources and tried again with the result you see in the attached log.
Same problem exists in Beta 3 --> the file is recognised but not indexed & not in Library
Any news on this, please, as it is still not functioning in beta 4?
I am able to
After scanning the resource file into 4.6c, I was able to see the resource in my library and search on it like any other resource. Are these the steps you are attempting?
Have you been attempting to scan the same resource file since 4.6c Beta 1? Or did you try with a different resource file in the newer betas? It is possible that scanning the initial resource file in Beta 1 had the effect of placing that resource in a bad state which is preventing it from being indexed in later betas.
Have you been attempting to scan the same resource file since 4.6c Beta 1?
Yes. I'll recompile in Beta 4 and try that.
Thank you, Brisa.
The new resource was recognised in v4.
