What is wrong with the following entry?
1. "It is clear that" ... is it clear that God cannot create a creature capable of creating? Pulling a presupposition out of thin air like this is an inappropriate style
2. "must have created all things" - isn't the merism "heavens and earth" the evidence of this? Of course, it is still an over-generalization as "all things" is limited in the text to "heavens and earth" i.e. perceivable universe according to several commentaries. I doubt that you mean to imply God created God.
How am I supposed to show off a great resource if it embarrasses me on the first "interested party" request? It's much easier to explain doctrinal differences than sloppy thought and/or writing.
