Bug? Clause with and without Object
Clause searches for
- subject:Adam (first man) object:NONE and
- subject:Adam (first man) object:ground, surface of the earth, land
produce a result in Gen 2:5 for the same clause "man does not exist to serve the land" (AF Phrase Marker Analysis)?
Also, I don't understand the result in Gen 3:3 "not you will eat from his/him and not you will touch in his/him lest you will die" (an undesirable outcome according to AF). Only the NONE object is highlighted and I've underlined the presumed Subject but the direct object is given as "his/him" (the tree) in AF?
Dave
===
Windows 11 & Android 13
Comments
-
Can I have a response for this, please!
Dave
===Windows 11 & Android 13
0 -
bump!
Dave
===Windows 11 & Android 13
0 -
Since we include clause-like nominal structures, there are actually two different "clauses" here:
- "there was no human being [to cultivate the ground]" (no object)
which contains:
- "cultivate the ground" (oblique nominalized infinitive with object=ground and implicit subject=Adam)
(translations from LEB)
0 -
Peter,
This is very subtle and the confusion arises because of the highlighting i.e. the NONE case includes the object.
Dave
===Windows 11 & Android 13
0
