forum feature

Blair Laird
Blair Laird Member Posts: 1,654
edited November 20 in English Forum

It would be nice if faithlife had the ability to be set up with an option to post more in a forum type fashion. It is rather annoying to have such short posts when having a discussion.

Tagged:

Comments

  • David Paul
    David Paul Member Posts: 6,003 ✭✭✭

    That is my unhappy experience. Not ever having used Twitter, I am rather used to being able to say what is needful without having to shave a character here and there to cram into an unnecessary communication limit. Not fun.

    ASUS  ProArt x570s Creator, AMD R9 5950x, HyperX 64gb 3600 RAM, ASUS Strix RTX 2080 ti

    "The Unbelievable Work...believe it or not."  Little children...Biblical prophecy is not Christianity's friend.

  • Milford Charles Murray
    Milford Charles Murray Member Posts: 5,004 ✭✭✭

    It would be nice if faithlife had the ability to be set up with an option to post more in a forum type fashion. It is rather annoying to have such short posts when having a discussion.

    Peace!       *smile*               I most certainly agree with you!               Also, I would find it very helpful indeed to be able to edit a post....   like we can do on the forums        ...................                           I make mistakes and change my mind         however                 FaithLife is "unchangeable" like the laws of the Medes and Persians, eh???

                                                        *smile*

    Philippians 4:  4 Rejoice in the Lord always; again I will say, Rejoice. 5 Let your reasonableness be known to everyone. The Lord is at hand..........

  • Patrick Nausha (Faithlife)
    Patrick Nausha (Faithlife) Member, Logos Employee Posts: 106

    I am happy to announce that we will be working on implementing a feature called group discussions in the next few weeks. In short, this feature is a forum for your group that will live in a new "Discussions" tab on your group page. The goal is to organize longer discussions like the ones you're describing better. Having topic threads should be much nicer than using many-reply posts or many messages.

    I look forward to hearing your feedback when it's done.

    -Patrick

    Software Developer
    Faithlife

  • Tes
    Tes Member Posts: 4,018 ✭✭✭

    Blessings in Christ.

  • Tes
    Tes Member Posts: 4,018 ✭✭✭

    Hi,Patric it would be better if you could start it on a new thread,so that every one may be able to see it.

    Blessings in Christ.

  • NB.Mick
    NB.Mick Member, MVP Posts: 15,840 ✭✭✭

    I hope it has nothing to do with faithlife.

    Huh? Patrick explained that it will be another tab in the Faithlife group view.  

    Have joy in the Lord! Smile

  • NB.Mick
    NB.Mick Member, MVP Posts: 15,840 ✭✭✭

    I am happy to announce that we will be working on implementing a feature called group discussions in the next few weeks.

    Thanks, great news! I'm looking forward to using it.

    Have joy in the Lord! Smile

  • Milford Charles Murray
    Milford Charles Murray Member Posts: 5,004 ✭✭✭

    I am happy to announce that we will be working on implementing a feature called group discussions in the next few weeks.

    Thanks, great news! I'm looking forward to using it.

    Yes!             Indeed!                                   Thanks so very much!                            Exactly where we should be going!   *smile*

                                                                                                                                           Psalm 29:11

    Philippians 4:  4 Rejoice in the Lord always; again I will say, Rejoice. 5 Let your reasonableness be known to everyone. The Lord is at hand..........

  • David Ames
    David Ames Member Posts: 2,977 ✭✭✭

    Also see http://community.logos.com/forums/p/70261/488355.aspx#488355  

    IF we are going to have a discussion we need to be able to insert a comment after the comment we wish to comment on. Even if we are inserting that comment six days latter [after there have been 200 other posts to the discussion]

  • David Paul
    David Paul Member Posts: 6,003 ✭✭✭

    The best forums I have used had nested topics and replies, much like folders and subfolders. Such a design makes it easy to follow specific topics and discrete discussions because responses are attached directly to the earlier comment and are slightly indented below it. The only disadvantage to these types of forums is that long discussions eventually get indented so far that each line can only contain one or two words, but that is usually pretty uncommon. I rarely see these formats anymore, unless it is a very old forum. These days, it is more common to find single-column formats like the Logos forum, which is too bad because, while simpler, it is less user friendly in terms of thread-tracking. It all looks very neat, but it can be rather bothersome trying to keep up with who is saying what to whom, what with scrolling up and down and even having to click back a page or two to see what the previous person said. I definitely prefer the nested sub-folder format. The problem of creeping indent can be reduced if indents are only one or two spaces.

    A few additional comments on that format--posts can be given titles and if a post is a reply and no title is chosen, then the post is titled RE:[title of previous post]. Also, in such formats, it is common to have unviewed posts appear blue (for instance) and those already viewed as gray, sort of like in most email in-boxes. That is very helpful in keeping track of which posts have been read and which have not. Also, if a conversation goes off-topic, it is a simple and easy thing to identify that sub-thread and ignore it if the subject matter is not of interest.

    ASUS  ProArt x570s Creator, AMD R9 5950x, HyperX 64gb 3600 RAM, ASUS Strix RTX 2080 ti

    "The Unbelievable Work...believe it or not."  Little children...Biblical prophecy is not Christianity's friend.

  • David Ames
    David Ames Member Posts: 2,977 ✭✭✭

    The best forums I have used had nested topics and replies, (...)

    long discussions eventually get indented so far (...)

    BUT if you join the discussion ten years latter you can still comment on every point in the discussion. And five years after that if someone is willing to put in the work required they can follow all of the discussion.  [I joined a Faithlife group just to test the ability of Faithlife to hold deep discussions.   It failed.  I did read the book they had discussed before I joined - I tried to become one with the group]