... because I don't have to scroll so much nor depend absolutely on the canonical order of books. With old style I could scan the columns and rows much more quickly.
I agree [y]
I agree too. The new arrangement is a big downgrade from my perspective.
[Y]
Ok, lets split the difference and make it optional.
Agreed here too.
I also agree...
The old layout will be returning in the next release. [:)]
The old layout will be returning in the next release.
[:)][Y]
I like the new one Drew. Any chance we would have it as an option? Only a few folks said that they like the old one. New wine is always better. [:)]
The opinions expressed have been heavily in favor of the old layout. We may run some experiments in the future to see if one is measurably better than the other. I personally prefer the new layout, but I'm not convinced it's universally better or worth the extra cost of an option.
I prefer the new layout mainly for the clear separation between the Old and New Treatments. If the old layout can be tweaked to show better separation, that would work as well.