Full date information no longer shown in "Last Updated" Library field

As the screenshot below shows, in 5.2a b1 the Library just shows previous months in the last updated field as opposed to showing the actual day as well - as it does in the current stable release.

Can the previous behaviour be restored please?

Thanks, Graham

Find more posts tagged with

Comments

Rosie Perera

This is definitely not appreciated. Those of us who tag use that Last Updated column sort to catch up on our tagging need the full date there. Thank you.

tom

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/558302#Comment_558302

This is definitely not appreciated

[y]

George Somsel

Mine still shows it.

Graham Criddle

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/558337#Comment_558337

Mine still shows it.

Interesting.

Just checking - are you running the beta?

George Somsel

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/558339#Comment_558339

Just checking - are you running the beta?

No. I running the approved for public consumption, guaranteed to contain no GMOs version—and no animals were injured in its production. [:D]

Martin Grainger Dean

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/558339#Comment_558339

Library just shows previous months in the last updated field as opposed to showing the actual day as well - as it does in the current stable release.

I can confirm the regression (bug?). Running 5.2a Beta 1 (5.2.1.0019) and only the month and year are shown. Martin.

Graham Criddle

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/558342#Comment_558342

Just checking - are you running the beta?

No. I running the approved for public consumption, guaranteed to contain no GMOs version—and no animals were injured in its production.

Thanks George

Agreed its fine in the stable release - it is an issue with the current beta.

So hopefully you won't see it when the stable version is released[:)]

Graham

George Somsel

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/558348#Comment_558348

Just checking - are you running the beta?

No. I running the approved for public consumption, guaranteed to contain no GMOs version—and no animals were injured in its production.

Thanks George

Agreed its fine in the stable release - it is an issue with the current beta.

So hopefully you won't see it when the stable version is released

Graham

Duh ! No wonder you asked whether I was running the Beta. I failed to notice the sub-forum this was in.

Rosie Perera

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/558346#Comment_558346

Library just shows previous months in the last updated field as opposed to showing the actual day as well - as it does in the current stable release.
I can confirm the regression (bug?). Running 5.2a Beta 1 (5.2.1.0019) and only the month and year are shown. Martin.

I'm thinking it isn't a regression/bug but an intentional change, however I strongly object to it. Any column that one can sort by should have a uniform format throughout, not day of week plus time for the most recent stuff and then month and year only for older things. A date is a date and should look consistent.

Jack Caviness

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/558392#Comment_558392

Any column that one can sort by should have a uniform format throughout, not day of week plus time for the most recent stuff and then month and year only for older things. A date is a date and should look consistent.

Agree completely. If this was intentional, it was a dumb idea that should be abandoned.

Keep Smiling 4 Jesus :)

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/558399#Comment_558399

Any column that one can sort by should have a uniform format throughout, not day of week plus time for the most recent stuff and then month and year only for older things. A date is a date and should look consistent.

Agree completely. If this was intentional, it was a dumb idea that should be abandoned.

+1 [Y] for consistent date formatting that always includes Day, Month, and Year (time would be nice); ideally use operating system settings for formatting since various locations have different conventions.

Keep Smiling [:)]

Rosie Perera

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/558404#Comment_558404

time would be nice

Time unnecessary IMO, since only on the very rarest of occasions are there more than one download of resources per day, and anyway time of download is not important. It's completely up to when you felt like downloading or when you purchased something; has nothing to do with when the resource was actually updated by Logos.

tom

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/558392#Comment_558392

Any column that one can sort by should have a uniform format throughout

[y]

Bradley Grainger (Logos)

This was already noted internally and has been fixed for Beta 2.

Rosie Perera

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/558507#Comment_558507

Yay! Thank you, Bradley.

Keep Smiling 4 Jesus :)

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/558507#Comment_558507

This was already noted internally and has been fixed for Beta 2.

+1 [Y] Looking forward to Beta 2.

Noticed Documents have Date column (with Month Day, Year), but Guides do not have a Date column.

Keep Smiling [:)]

Graham Criddle

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/558507#Comment_558507

This was already noted internally and has been fixed for Beta 2.

That's good news.

Thanks Bradley.

Rosie Perera

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/558523#Comment_558523

Noticed Documents have Date column (with Month Day, Year), but Guides do not have a Date column.

Good point. I suspect dates matter less for Guides, since presumably you'd get the same result if you ran the same guide again at a later date (unless you'd purchased more resources in the meantime). So the date it was created is less important. However, it would still be useful to be able to sort by date in order to remember what you'd been working on most recently. So I would vote for adding a date column for Guides. [EDIT: Possibly ditto for saved Layouts.]

Jack Caviness

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/558529#Comment_558529

it would still be useful to be able to sort by date in order to remember what you'd been working on most recently.

When we get to the point that we need such a reminder, we have too many irons in the fire [:D]. But, then, I know how that feels.

tom

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/558547#Comment_558547

When we get to the point that we need such a reminder, we have too many irons in the fire

[y]

Rosie Perera

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/558547#Comment_558547

it would still be useful to be able to sort by date in order to remember what you'd been working on most recently.

When we get to the point that we need such a reminder, we have too many irons in the fire . But, then, I know how that feels.

For me it's more like -- I was working on something three months ago and have left it untouched since then and would like to get back and continue working on it now that I have some more time. And my Guides list is cluttered with all sorts of sample ones I might have been testing for bug reports or whatever. I should really clean it up someday. That's probably a more likely solution than getting a date column in there.

Graham Criddle

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/558507#Comment_558507

This was already noted internally and has been fixed for Beta 2.

Confirmed

Thanks Logos