Hi
May I know if Logos will consider selling the "N.T. Wright for Everyone Bible Study Guides"?
Tim
Welcome to the forums Tim! [:)]
Logos isn't likely to give you a direct answer. Here is the best I can do:
I sent an email to someone at Logos asking them about these. I think they would be fine in Vyrso, which would be great and they could be added relatively quickly.
Thank you. This is a good companion to Wright's commentary series.
Hi Tim,
Are these the ones you mean?
As far as I can tell, he's still working on the series. We have all of the titles he's released so far.
Hi Ray
No, Tim is referring to the study guides which are companions to the commentaries
See http://www.amazon.co.uk/For-Everyone-Bible-Study-Guides/dp/0281061785 for an example
And having the series available in Logos would be good[:)]
Graham
Ah. Got it.
I'll pass this suggestion along to the right people.
Ah. Got it. I'll pass this suggestion along to the right people.
My personal opinion? These would be best in Vyrso... But I understand Logos would probably put them in logos Instead. In which case, I would purchase them from Amazon. [;)]
These would be best in Vyrso...
I'd prefer Logos for two reason:
They're on my list! [:)]
Yes, Graham, that's the one. Excellent guides for personal and group Bible study.
These would be best in Vyrso... I'd prefer Logos for two reason: linkage to the text text fields to enter answers ... although this feature is too limited for my taste at the moment, the abillity to enter sample/interesting answers is valuable to me.
And the text fields? Waste of time.
Perhaps. But I have learned that Logos interprets "lack of use" as "lack of interest" rather than as "poor implementation" so I act accordingly to push Logos in an appropriate direction.
How would they link to the text?
In my dreams, I could make a personal note that linked both the text and the study guide to my note[;)] Seriously, they don't require a great deal of linking but being able to have them linked for scrolling and have parallel results from topic searches ...
Have you used these?
Not formally