Logos only lets your transfer book Licenses once???
Today I called logos to get some books moved from my account to a new account I wanted to start for my wife. They told me it was not possible because the books I wanted to transfer had already been through a license transfer once. This was truce. I had purchased these book from a another person earlier. But since when did Logos start this policy of only allowing you to transfer book licenses once?
Comments
-
And why don't they notify us of policy changes like this? This is very frustrating...
0 -
Welcome to the forums.
from the EULA:
At Logos' sole discretion you may transfer all your rights to use the Software, Content, and Documentation to another person or legal entity provided you transfer this Agreement, the Software, Content, and Documentation, including all copies, updates and prior versions to such person or entity and that you retain no copies, including copies stored on computer. There will be a processing fee charged on all transfers which is subject to change without notice. As of 6/17/09 the fee is equal to $20.00 per transfer.
To the best of my knowledge, it's been a single transfer for quite some time ... but I haven't had reason to try it.
Orthodox Bishop Alfeyev: "To be a theologian means to have experience of a personal encounter with God through prayer and worship."; Orthodox proverb: "We know where the Church is, we do not know where it is not."
0 -
David Dobbs said:
Today I called logos to get some books moved from my account to a new account I wanted to start for my wife.
I didn't know about this policy, and I would be frustrated with it... I did want to make sure that you were aware that your wife can use your resources already... on your account. There are some disadvantages to sharing your account with your spouse, but it is certainly a cheaper alternative to making multiple purchases.
macOS, iOS & iPadOS |Logs| Install
Choose Truth Over Tribe | Become a Joyful Outsider!0 -
MJ. Smith said:
To the best of my knowledge, it's been a single transfer for quite some time
Did you gain this understanding from the EULA? I don't see any way to read that limitation in the EULA.
macOS, iOS & iPadOS |Logs| Install
Choose Truth Over Tribe | Become a Joyful Outsider!0 -
As quoted, the EULA does not expressly state such a restriction, which means that the transferee should get every right available to the transferor, including the (subsequent) right of transfer. If there is a restriction, it's somewhere else. Maybe it is to be found in the "sole discretion".
0 -
I wonder if they suspect the OP was trying to "flip" the resources, or if the hidden restrictions are in place to prevent people from doing that sort of thing?
L2 lvl4 (...) WORDsearch, all the way through L10,
0 -
Interesting. I can see this being an issue in a situation like mine where I've specifically called out in my will to transfer the rights to the software to my wife and then told her she can either use it or then transfer it to our (then current) pastor or some needy seminary student down the road as she sees fit. I'd hate to think that she wouldn't be able to bless someone after I am gone and she no longer has a need.
0 -
MJ. Smith said:
To the best of my knowledge, it's been a single transfer for quite some time ...
This is a new development. And it is a bad one too. Why should I buy any more Logos resources if, when I die, my heir can not receive my resources because Logos changed their policy. NOT a confidence builder!
Logos 7 Collectors Edition
0 -
Erik said:
I've specifically called out in my will to transfer the rights to the software to my wife and then told her she can either use it or then transfer it to our (then current) pastor or some needy seminary student down the road as she sees fit.
Exactly!
Logos 7 Collectors Edition
0 -
I was unaware of this policy. I don't understand how the EULA helps except that it is at Logos' discretion that they do what they do.
I suspect that they want limitations in place so that people don't become Logos resource resellers. But for a situation like this, I do not see why there would be a limitation.
Jacob Hantla
Pastor/Elder, Grace Bible Church
gbcaz.org0 -
I feel really sorry for Unix. I just assumed if he didn't need the volumes that I didn't need, he could move them along to another user.
But this sounds a lot like the instructions from Jesus. The 'poor' should choose wisely from the 'rich' since transfer rights occur only once. This may well explain why the rich man was so upset, and the disciples almost blew a gasket.
(I assume; maybe Logos only got its wires tangled up.)
"If myth is ideology in narrative form, then scholarship is myth with footnotes." B. Lincolm 1999.
0 -
alabama24 said:
Did you gain this understanding from the EULA?
No from some exchanges on the used market ... the EULA simply tells you that there may be limitations. And logic told me that their we keep it updated for free had to have a practical limitation in length.
Orthodox Bishop Alfeyev: "To be a theologian means to have experience of a personal encounter with God through prayer and worship."; Orthodox proverb: "We know where the Church is, we do not know where it is not."
0 -
Hopefully Bob or someone from Logos can provide some clarification.
http://www.TrinityExamined.com
0 -
I dont like this, I'm growing disappointments toward Logos.
I was hoping my children's children could one day use my account someday for the glory of God.
I'm super discouraged of buying future resources.
0 -
MJ, how did you know about this limitation? Is it stated somewhere we can read ourselves?
0 -
Jacob Hantla said:
I was unaware of this policy. I don't understand how the EULA helps except that it is at Logos' discretion that they do what they do.
I have bought Logos resources from other users for several years. This provision of "only one transfer" has never been mentioned until this week. I just sold the SDA Bible Commentary v3.0 and the transfer email from Logos Customer Service had the "one transfer" rule at the bottom of the email.
This is a grave development. My (and your) Logos resources have just lost most of their value. The only way I can see around the policy is to designate the executor of the will to dispose of the transferable resources rather than leave it to someone by name. Now I have to change my will............and delete my CP list.
Logos 7 Collectors Edition
0 -
I agree! I have over 2000 resouces that I have been building since 1999 and I was hoping to pass these resources down to my family or possibly friends for generations. This is extremely disappointing! Logos needs to reconsider this policy. And I am definitely reconsidering my long committed loyalty to them.
0 -
Are not older users "grandfathered in" to an earlier licence agreement that did not have this limitation?
http://www.TrinityExamined.com
0 -
Call back, try to talk to someone different. You might get lucky.
Plus I believe bequeathing your library is different than giving your wife some files.
Finally, one could simply leave ones username and password in the will with instructions to the executor to call and remove your credit card from the account.L2 lvl4 (...) WORDsearch, all the way through L10,
0 -
alabama24 said:MJ. Smith said:
To the best of my knowledge, it's been a single transfer for quite some time
Did you gain this understanding from the EULA? I don't see any way to read that limitation in the EULA.
Well, what can I say MJ is special. There's no way you can read that from the EULA. However, they have now started including that information as a side note on the email that starts the process when you transfer a license. I had the same issue when I purchased a resource from another user. I'd say if we're paying a $20 dollar transfer fee we shouldn't be limited to transfer it as many times as we want - they're getting $20 bucks each time anyway. What if I purchase something from a user and then want to transfer it to my brother or a missionary? I think that should be changed to transfer licenses as many times as we want or allow it only once, but remove the $20 fee. Just a suggestion.
DAL
0 -
abondservant said:
Call back, try to talk to someone different. You might get lucky.
Plus I believe bequeathing your library is different than giving your wife some files.
Finally, one could simply leave ones username and password in the will with instructions to the executor to call and remove your credit card from the account.The problem is that I want my wife to be able to continue to build the library and use it for as long as she wishes. The right to pass the licenses should not then terminate with my wife. I'd like to know that these resources could pass on a generational level to my heirs or be further transferred to a needy soul and not escheat to Logos.
0 -
I understand what you're saying Erik - but I don't see how my scenario is incompatible with yours?
If you die, and your wife has not yet - she can leave the credit card on there and purchase titles.
When she dies, she can leave the username and password to whomever she likes with instructions to the executor to remove the CC info. When the recipient of your account then grows old and passes, they could leave the username and password in their will, with instructions to their executor to remove their credit card information from the account. and so forth.L2 lvl4 (...) WORDsearch, all the way through L10,
0 -
David Dobbs said:
I agree! I have over 2000 resouces that I have been building since 1999 and I was hoping to pass these resources down to my family or possibly friends for generations. This is extremely disappointing! Logos needs to reconsider this policy. And I am definitely reconsidering my long committed loyalty to them.
- I had 15,000+ resources until I sold the SDA Commentary.
- My account total shows just under $xx,000.
- I am a legally blind, double-amputee with a shorter-than-normal life expectancy.
- If I can't transfer my resources, why buy them?
I just deleted my CP list. All $7000+.
I will email Bob and Dan Pritchet tomorrow, after the sick feeling in my stomach subsides. [:$]
Logos 7 Collectors Edition
0 -
Okay guys (plural not DAL in particular or in isolation) ... turn on your logical side
DAL said:Well, what can I say MJ is special. There's no way you can read that from the EULA.
I neither said nor implied that the EULA indicated that the limitation was one transfer. What one can gather from the EULA is that the privilege is unlikely to be unlimited.
Now, turn on your logic processor again. When Logos says that they will update the tagging for the resources for free, do you expect that to be true 500 years (15 generations) in the future? Do you expect the commitment to be kept every time the company changes hands? (my roof guarantee lasted thru one but not two purchases). The point is that you reasonably know that there is some cutoff designed to reasonably support both you and the company. I did appreciate the guarantee that came with my psaltery ... for as long as the craftsman is in the business - I thought that was honesty.
I'm not saying I agree or disagree with the cutoff Logos has chosen - I was merely the messenger pointing out we have good reason to believe that there was a cutoff ... and that the cutoff corresponded to my own perception.
Orthodox Bishop Alfeyev: "To be a theologian means to have experience of a personal encounter with God through prayer and worship."; Orthodox proverb: "We know where the Church is, we do not know where it is not."
0 -
David, I've asked the head of customer service to help you.
In general, we have very few 'policies' -- more like guidelines we put in place to control costs.
Our only real, unbreakable policy is to do the right thing for our customer.
In our team's defense, your account is not the simplest -- it looks like you do much more license acquiring from others than typical users, and the most recent transaction required our developers to get involved to make database changes.
License transfer is something we do as a courtesy,but which requires a lot of manual work on our end. It would be both expensive and undesirable to automate it -- it would take a lot of code, to support a scenario we're not fond of. While most of our users have completely reasonable and legitimate reasons for transfer, as mentioned in this forum, there are always abusive situations which we're trying to keep from making too easy.
(Buying one copy of a book and transferring it through a dozen people in a single class in a single week, for example. The ebook equivalent of buying a dress on Friday and returning it on Saturday. Or buying stuff in bundles and sales and then selling the individual titles one at a time to other people for more than their component price in the bundle.)
I know it's easy to say 'it's just like re-selling a paper book!' But it's not. The business model of bundled sales, the license rates and contracts involved, etc. are all built on an assumption that we're making single sales, not passing around a never-gets-old, never-fades, never-gets-dog-eared, never-gets-marked-up-with-someone-else's-notes, never-has-to-be-shipped digital copy. Paper books simply involve a level of friction in pass-along that digital don't, and the business models reflect this.
I've written a lot about this in the past, and don't want to re-hash it all here. But the bottom line -- now, as always -- is that we'll do the right thing for our users. I don't think that requires us to submit to excessive abuse, and so there still are loose 'policies' our team creates and continually changes to adapt to whatever game / manipulation the worst 'system exploiters' are practicing at the moment, but these aren't announced or published because they barely exist and are ephemeral. If they were published they'd be rules we've committed to, rather than guidelines we use to curb abuse. And, given the creativity of the system exploiters, we'd need a lot of rules that were overly onerous for our legit and valued customers.
I know this requires a bit of trust, but I hope we've earned that over the years. I don't think we've ever let a policy get in the way of doing the right thing for the user; sometimes a person on the front-line is too aggressive in citing/using a policy, but you can always appeal -- as now - and we're pretty consistent about making things right.
(I'm using 'system exploiters' as a way of talking about people who really aren't acting in a spirit of kindness or even honesty -- it's not about you, it's the people who aren't on the forums who are pushing the limits or even stealing. A good example: we don't have any limit on the number of machines you can sign into Logos with. People internally have suggested two or three devices max, but that would unnecessarily punish legitimate users who run multiple laptops, or constantly change machines, etc. But every once in a while someone registers one copy of the software and then SELLS their username and password to others -- once as many as 90 times! This is clearly an abuse, and we watch for it and shut it down with a 'policy' of one user per account. We sometimes even smoke out the person who has done this with just three machines, but clearly three different people not in the same family, based on locations / logins / etc. Having a five machine limit would give 'permission' to the four-unit thief while stopping the 90 unit thief, but it would annoy the legitimate 'many machines' user. We prefer to not have a published policy, and not care if the legit user has twelve machines, but be able to turn off the five machine user who is re-selling their access credentials.)
0 -
Super.Tramp said:
My (and your) Logos resources have just lost most of their value.
Give me a break ... mine still are holding up better than my dead tree format. Not to mention that their real value should be the content not the resale price.
Orthodox Bishop Alfeyev: "To be a theologian means to have experience of a personal encounter with God through prayer and worship."; Orthodox proverb: "We know where the Church is, we do not know where it is not."
0 -
abondservant said:
I wonder if they suspect the OP was trying to "flip" the resources, or if the hidden restrictions are in place to prevent people from doing that sort of thing?
Logos KNOWS there is less value to a resource that can not be transferred. They sell academic resources at a discount and have restrictions on how quickly the user can "flip" them. Now everyone who paid retail is limited too!?
Logos 7 Collectors Edition
0 -
This kills the desire to get resources in Logos. Logos as I understand it cannot be left to a church. My plan was to leave Logos to the rector of my church (general, with a caveat that on his leaving he should transfer it to the next rector. I am not planning on dying any time soon but no one is. If I passed and then 2 months later the pastor died, my $25,000+ worth of Logos books are now worth nothing to anyone??? One reason I have been so willing to purchase resources is the knowledge that others would later be able to use them after I am gone. At this point it seems pointless to purchase more resources in Logos.
-Dan
0 -
abondservant said:
If you die, and your wife has not yet - she can leave the credit card on there and purchase titles.That would work if my credit card companies continue to issue replacement cards once they eventually expire and also if the credit card company has no issues with someone impersonating me postmortem. I'm not trying to be flippant, but somehow I don't think they'll do or allow that.
I also presume that Logos wants a credit card from the owner of the account in order to process a payment. The risk of fraud would be too great otherwise IMHO.
0 -
Bob Pritchett said:
I don't think we've ever let a policy get in the way of doing the right thing for the user; sometimes a person on the front-line is too aggressive in citing/using a policy, but you can always appeal -- as now - and we're pretty consistent about making things right. I can attest to this. Logos has been flexible on a couple of occasions as far as returns and one transfer that involved the case mentioned by the OP. They did the right thing and I believe they will do the right thing for those of us who are legit, loyal customers.
(I'm using 'system exploiters' as a way of talking about people who really aren't acting in a spirit of kindness or even honesty -- it's not about you, it's the people who aren't on the forums who are pushing the limits or even stealing. A good example: we don't have any limit on the number of machines you can sign into Logos with. People internally have suggested two or three devices max, but that would unnecessarily punish legitimate users who run multiple laptops, or constantly change machines, etc. But every once in a while someone registers one copy of the software and then SELLS their username and password to others -- once as many as 90 times! This is clearly an abuse, and we watch for it and shut it down with a 'policy' of one user per account. We sometimes even smoke out the person who has done this with just three machines, but clearly three different people not in the same family, based on locations / logins / etc. Having a five machine limit would give 'permission' to the four-unit thief while stopping the 90 unit thief, but it would annoy the legitimate 'many machines' user. We prefer to not have a published policy, and not care if the legit user has twelve machines, but be able to turn off the five machine user who is re-selling their access credentials.)
I think abusers like these should be banned from using the software, since it's illegal to do what you just described. The only time I change machines is from iPhone app to iPad to laptop and then a different laptop when my old one crashes (which I'm afraid I'll be changing laptop again sometime soon - which is expected - a laptop every 2 years or 3 tops).
0
