Anyone familiar with the status of the More Old Testament Pseudepigrapha Project?

I think each volume on the PG (and by extension apocrypha, depending on the grouping), has a useful perspective.

Charles: Older, but one of the few that's commentary based and combines the PG with the apocrypha for discussion.  Includes text.

Charlesworth: Updates Charles, and discussion-based; includes text. Considerable depth.

Nickelsburg: One of the best for looking at the writings by time-period and development.  For example, the Sybilline Oracles are broken up by estimated writing period.  Discussion; no text. In-depth.

Docherty: Groups by type of writing (genre); discussion, no text.  A number of other volumes bounce around by genre; this one is a disciplined grouping, though an introduction.

Eerdmans Dictionary of Early Judaism: this and similar pick up some of the more unusual writings, plus author discussion, etc.

OT Pseudepigrapha - More: Very useful on the 'edges', especially where your search isn't having any luck.  Formatted similar to Charlesworth but no overlap.

Penner/Heiser's PG Interlinear: Includes the primary greek ones; no english glosses, but very useful looking for re-used phrasing (connectivity)

Collin's 'Between Athens & Jerusalem': Fills in the more greek associated authors and writings (overlaps with some PG and apocrypha).  Discussion; no text.  The grouping is unusual; sort of a 'motivation'-grouped.

Jonathan Pitts said:

It looks like it's a brief introduction (224 pages) but without the texts themselves. With Charlesworth (and I presume this new volume: I'm waiting for some sort of discount on it before buying) you get the text and some background information. 

It's not. Each text has an introductory essay and an English translation. A lot of the texts are fairly short, or even fragmentary, hence the length.

A big problem with the Logos version (IMO) is that most of the texts don't have proper milestones (not even relatively well-known texts like "The Life of Adam and Eve").

Mark Barnes said:

Jonathan Pitts said:

It looks like it's a brief introduction (224 pages) but without the texts themselves. With Charlesworth (and I presume this new volume: I'm waiting for some sort of discount on it before buying) you get the text and some background information. 

It's not. Each text has an introductory essay and an English translation. A lot of the texts are fairly short, or even fragmentary, hence the length.

A big problem with the Logos version (IMO) is that most of the texts don't have proper milestones (not even relatively well-known texts like "The Life of Adam and Eve").

I was replying to Veli's post about Docherty's book. Are you referring to that or Bauckham's book?

Veli Voipio said:

Good to know!

And how about this, any opinions:

https://www.logos.com/product/47303/the-jewish-pseudepigrapha-an-introduction-to-the-literature-of-the-second-temple-period 

Interesting resource thanks.

Veli Voipio said:

I did buy this book

The book is from 2013, so the next question: do you think are there any links to this book from other Logos books?

https://www.logos.com/product/49494/old-testament-pseudepigrapha-more-noncanonical-scriptures-vol-1

Have you tried to use the Cited By tool to see whether that's the case?