[request] @Eli - new clean thread re: "Top Bibles"
What is the logic behind having the top Bibles ignore the prioritization rules of canon and advanced priorities?
Orthodox Bishop Alfeyev: "To be a theologian means to have experience of a personal encounter with God through prayer and worship."; Orthodox proverb: "We know where the Church is, we do not know where it is not."
Comments
-
I'm not sure exactly what you mean.
0 -
Very simple - all tools that use "Top Bibles" simply use the first 5 Bible mentioned in the Priority List - ignoring that they don't contain the book in question (e.g. are OT only on a NT passage) or that advanced priority limits them to an inapplicable range or resource. See https://community.logos.com/forums/t/103659.aspx
Edit: Dave says resource specific are ignored ... I'll need to retest.
Orthodox Bishop Alfeyev: "To be a theologian means to have experience of a personal encounter with God through prayer and worship."; Orthodox proverb: "We know where the Church is, we do not know where it is not."
0 -
It seems best if resource-specific rules are ignored, because those rules only get triggered in the event that a hyperlink originates from the specified resource. That's pretty (pardon me) specific, and contrary to the general spirit of "Top" in "Top Bibles."
Otherwise, Top Bibles is pretty dumb straightforward, and probably due for some design attention.
0 -
This is my personal Faithlife account. On 1 March 2022, I started working for Faithlife, and have a new 'official' user account. Posts on this account shouldn't be taken as official Faithlife views!
0
