Here's another reminder that we haven't seen anything but regression since Logos 4 in the ability to do search for vowels/accents (not matching).
Please see one of the more recent related threads:
https://community.logos.com/forums/t/103768.aspx?PageIndex=1
And vote up the UserVoice suggestion here:
http://logos.uservoice.com/forums/42823-logos-bible-software-6/suggestions/7592991-please-support-hebrew-actually
Eli's response still applies: https://community.logos.com/forums/p/103768/726295.aspx#726295
We're aware of your requests; you don't need to repost them.
reposting has the benefit of alerting more users who may not visit the forums regularly or who are new. It wasn't until after I posted my request that I found ancient threads addressing the same issue, but which had grown dormant.
Another reason for reposting is to simply remind all who are already aware but may easily push it to the back burner and forget. Like I told Eli before, I will continue to repost periodically until I see this come to fruition. Thanks for allowing me that freedom of speech.😇
It might be better to create a thread dedicated to informing users of your UserVoice suggestion and bumping it from time to time.
1 vote more. Not sure if I can use it much, but appreciate detailed search capabilities. [8-|]
Another reason for reposting is to simply remind all who are already aware but may easily push it to the back burner and forget.
I appreciate this greatly. And, I wish more Logos users would come out of their closets. Indeed the more voices on this issue and the more frequent Logos/faithlife hears about this the greater chance for progress to be made. Otherwise, I think it obvious Logos/faithlife as well as many of their users are simply going to forget about this issue.
Remember, the Richter Morphology ( Biblia Hebraica Transcripta) first advertised back in 2009? Well, it was included on the official list of Logos4 resources, but apparently it has largely been forgotten or maybe it was vaporware? Who knows? And, why hasn't any offical notice ever been published so that we know what's going on?
Or, how about the Werkgroep Informatica Vrije Universiteit (WIVU) syntactical database? We, actually were able to use back in the Libronix days(before Logos4, 5 and 6), but alas no more[:'(]. We, were also able to view the WIVU Constituency Trees trees, but no more. Why? Once, again no one seems to know nor has any official notice from Logos/faithlife ever been posted/published on the issue.
Another reason for reposting is to simply remind all who are already aware but may easily push it to the back burner and forget. I appreciate this greatly. And, I wish more Logos users would come out of their closets. Indeed the more voices on this issue and the more frequent Logos/faithlife hears about this the greater chance for progress to be made. Otherwise, I think it obvious Logos/faithlife as well as many of their users are simply going to forget about this issue. Remember, the Richter Morphology ( Biblia Hebraica Transcripta) first advertised back in 2009? Well, it was included on the official list of Logos4 resources, but apparently it has largely been forgotten or maybe it was vaporware? Who knows? And, why hasn't any offical notice ever been published so that we know what's going on? Or, how about the Werkgroep Informatica Vrije Universiteit (WIVU) syntactical database? We, actually were able to use back in the Libronix days(before Logos4, 5 and 6), but alas no more. We, were also able to view the WIVU Constituency Trees trees, but no more. Why? Once, again no one seems to know nor has any official notice from Logos/faithlife ever been posted/published on the issue.
Or, how about the Werkgroep Informatica Vrije Universiteit (WIVU) syntactical database? We, actually were able to use back in the Libronix days(before Logos4, 5 and 6), but alas no more. We, were also able to view the WIVU Constituency Trees trees, but no more. Why? Once, again no one seems to know nor has any official notice from Logos/faithlife ever been posted/published on the issue.
Agree [Y]