Syntax search & Anarthrous nouns
I'm trying to build a syntax search for the Granville Sharp rule. Is there anyway to do a search for nouns without an article?
Article - Noun - Kai - Noun (no article)
Comments
-
Logos has tagged occurrences of the Granville Sharp construction. Do you have the Greek Grammatical Constructions Documentation?
[quote]
• This can be searched for with {Section <GramCon GSharp>} in the Bible Search (Basic Search can also be used).
James Parks, Greek Grammatical Constructions Documentation (Bellingham, WA: Faithlife, 2015).
0 -
Jack Caviness said:
Logos has tagged occurrences of the Granville Sharp construction. Do you have the Greek Grammatical Constructions Documentation?
Note this requires a Logos Now subscription
0 -
Thanks Jack and Graham for the replies. I don't have Logos Now so that handy search tool is not something I can use right now. To be honest I am more interested in learning how to do syntax searches then finding all the occurrences of the Granville sharp. I have been unable to determine a way to do anarthrous noun searches.
0 -
read https://community.logos.com/forums/p/105474/729934.aspx
Orthodox Bishop Alfeyev: "To be a theologian means to have experience of a personal encounter with God through prayer and worship."; Orthodox proverb: "We know where the Church is, we do not know where it is not."
0 -
Lankford Oxendine said:
To be honest I am more interested in learning how to do syntax searches then finding all the occurrences of the Granville sharp. I have been unable to determine a way to do anarthrous noun searches.
Sorry, I can't help you with that, as Syntax Searching is similar to voodoo for me [:P] I just have not found the right place to stick the needle.
Seriously, I am working my way through John Fallahee's videos on searching in Logos (learnlogos.com ). Perhaps someday soon I may master syntax searching.
0 -
MJ,
Thanks for the links. I'll read them tonight.
Jack,
I just finished Fallahee's video on syntax searching and have been practicing my voodoo, hence the reason for my post. Thanks again.
0
