A couple more notes observations/requests
First Issue
In Libronix I was able to use an underline, or double underline for marking my note references in the text. I preferred doing it that way, so it would not look like highlighting, and would be a bit less intrusive when read the text.
These protocols came over when I imported my L3 notes into L4. Thanks!
At the same time, there is no way to do this in L4 (or is there?), even though it is possible to display these styles. So I'm asking for the return of the option to use these styles (as well as the other L3 note styles).
Second Issue
The second thing I noticed is that I have some notes out of canonical order. There doesn't seem to be anyway to resort the notes, once they are in the note file (or did I miss it?). Once again, a feature in L3 that's missing in L4. So I'm asking for the return of this option as well.
(I haven't seen these reported before, though I'm also waiting on the other note features that have been mentioned, especially hyperlinking.)
Help links: WIKI; Logos 6 FAQ. (Phil. 2:14, NIV)
Comments
-
Richard DeRuiter said:
In Libronix I was able to use an underline, or double underline for marking my note references in the text. I preferred doing it that way, so it would not look like highlighting, and would be a bit less intrusive when read the text.
These protocols came over when I imported my L3 notes into L4. Thanks!
At the same time, there is no way to do this in L4 (or is there?), even though it is possible to display these styles. So I'm asking for the return of the option to use these styles (as well as the other L3 note styles).
Richard in the "Highlighting" tool/panel etc have you clicked (below the colored options) on the the title "Emphasis Marking"? When it "opens" there is a double and a triple under-liner there , as well as my favorite the "colored box!!" There are at least two other "sets" of differing markings that can be clicked on, as well as the standard "solid colors" that appear as the first choices at the top of the panel.
[Have I understood what you are asking?]
Richard DeRuiter said:Second Issue
The second thing I noticed is that I have some notes out of canonical order.
I believe that this is a "bug" that will be addressed? At least I thought I read that.
Regards, SteveF
0 -
SteveF said:
Richard in the "Highlighting" tool/panel etc have you clicked (below the colored options) on the the title "Emphasis Marking"?
I know this is available in highlighting. But it's not available as an option in notes. Is it?
Help links: WIKI; Logos 6 FAQ. (Phil. 2:14, NIV)
0 -
Richard DeRuiter said:
But it's not available as an option in notes. Is it?
SORRY Richard.
I have no idea
Pardon me.
Steve
Regards, SteveF
0 -
-
steve clark said:
Highlighting doesn't work in Sr3 inside the notes. Does it work in bB3 ?
Nope. Never tried it before you asked, but I just did, and it doesn't.
Help links: WIKI; Logos 6 FAQ. (Phil. 2:14, NIV)
0 -
steve clark said:
Highlighting doesn't work in Sr3 inside the notes. Does it work in bB3 ?
As Richard already observed, no it doesn't. However, you can do underlining (even though the button isn't there) just use ctrl+u.
Prov. 15:23
0
