According to the Gospel Coalition (!!) we should be using this dictionary/lexicon. I thought I'd refresh my memory of its utility and found the following in the Greek-English Dictionary section
Great work Dave.
It's this kind of post which makes me think that maybe the MVPs like yourself should have 'enhanced privileges' and some kind of great discount deal as a thank-you (maybe you have one already!) Otherwise we're left waiting for a Logos employee to check in and agree to 'raise a case.'
So why not allow MVP's to raise a case! You all have a vast amount of experience with the software, are using it regularly and have a track record of helping others. This would 'cut out the middle man' and indeed result in far less forum posts like this one - since you could raise a case directly instead of reporting the issues on the forums.
In any case, thanks for drawing attention to this issue. I hope a Logos employee will indeed create a case.
Colin
So why not allow MVP's to raise a case!
MVP's do indeed enjoy some "privileges" but we only have the ability to notify Faithlife (the company) about user threads that appear to have been overlooked (with very good results). It is then up to Faithlife to acknowledge that there is an issue and create a case internally. A more direct method posed technical/security issues that could not be easily overcome.
MVP's may have the experience to recognise more technical issues, and even put forward a very compelling case, but we are still users; even when we support another user's issue e.g. recommending it be changed from an enquiry to a 'bug' report.
Thanks for pointing this out. I've begun the update process.
I am using a san serif font and the 1's are more clearly distinguishable.
numeral 1 look like letter I. Note vertical alignment of 73x at [11]
On the numerals, this is because with a serif font, the display prefers "old style numerals" which is supported by some fonts. Note "143" in item 26; also "[27] in item 27. Some numerals extend below or above the baseline due to presence of an ascender or descender; others are equivalent with the lower-case letter bound. Sans serif fonts typically do not support this display variant.
maybe the MVPs like yourself should have 'enhanced privileges' and some kind of great discount deal
I'll go farther than that...look at my sig line.
(Been there a while...no idea if anyone notices it.)
look at my sig line. (Been there a while...no idea if anyone notices it.)
look at my sig line.
Yes I've noticed and agree wholeheartedly!
Still, thanks for clarifying your role Dave.
And thanks to Kyle for making sure it gets sorted out.
Colin.
Thanks, Kyle
On the numerals, this is because with a serif font, the display prefers "old style numerals" which is supported by some fonts.
I've always preferred the Logos 4 Default font without being concerned whether it is serif or sans serif. The Mounce resource is perhaps the only one to accentuate the numeral style because of the proximity of letters (x) and numbers.
