Incorrect hyperlink in "Crucifixion of the Warrior God"
Page 63 of "the Crucifixion of the Warrior God" footnote 105 has a link to Bruce's NICNT commentary on Colossians.
It links to page 207 whereas the quote is from page 74 as shown below
Anyone know if this error is in the hard copy or it is a Logos linking mistake?
"Look Inside" on Amazon shows the same incorrect cross-reference so I suspect the problem is in the original resource.
Comments
-
Different issue, but I noticed that the introduction to vol 2 immediately follows the introduction to vol 1. Seems like odd placement, since the intro to vol 2 assumes the reader has already read vol 1. Shouldn't the intro to vol 2 follow the entire text of vol 1?
0 -
Graham Criddle said:
Page 63 of "the Crucifixion of the Warrior God" footnote 105 has a link to Bruce's NICNT commentary on Colossians.
It links to page 207 whereas the quote is from page 74 as shown below
Anyone know if this error is in the hard copy or it is a Logos linking mistake?
"Look Inside" on Amazon shows the same incorrect cross-reference so I suspect the problem is in the original resource.
Thanks. Since the typo is in the original we can let the publisher know.
Paul Strickert said:Different issue, but I noticed that the introduction to vol 2 immediately follows the introduction to vol 1. Seems like odd placement, since the intro to vol 2 assumes the reader has already read vol 1. Shouldn't the intro to vol 2 follow the entire text of vol 1?
This is a fairly typical way for us to handle prefatory material in what exists--due to size constraints--as two volumes in print. It's not ideal but plopping an "Introduction" between Parts III and IV feels odd as well.
0 -
Thanks Kyle
Appreciated, Graham
0 -
Kyle G. Anderson said:Paul Strickert said:
Different issue, but I noticed that the introduction to vol 2 immediately follows the introduction to vol 1. Seems like odd placement, since the intro to vol 2 assumes the reader has already read vol 1. Shouldn't the intro to vol 2 follow the entire text of vol 1?
This is a fairly typical way for us to handle prefatory material in what exists--due to size constraints--as two volumes in print. It's not ideal but plopping an "Introduction" between Parts III and IV feels odd as well.
This decision with made for one of my happiest discoveries in recent weeks - the introductions to The Dictionary of Classical Hebrew seem almost farcical when read in quick sequence as they project with tremendous optimism how it's all plain-sailing now this volume is out of the way, immediately followed by the next volume explaining how it got away from them, but next time, it'll be much easier... This is repeated on loop in each volume. It makes sense given the ambition of the project, but it is hilarious.
0
