21st century Biblical commentary series - AMG Publishers

Ted Hans said:

I would love to see the 21st Century Biblical Commentary series available in Logos. AMG Publishers. http://www.amgpublishers.com/www/docs/112.93/21st-century-series.html Thanks Ted

21st Century Biblical Commentary Series Gospel of Matthew Commentary Gospel of Mark Commentary Gospel of Luke Commentary Gospel of John Commentary Book of Acts Commentary Book of Romans Commentary Book of First Corinthians Commentary Book of Second Corinthians Commentary Books of Philippians and Colossians Pastorals Commentary: 1, 2 Timothy, Titus & Philemon Books of James and 1,2 Peter Commentary Epistles of 1,2,3 John & Jude Book of Revelation Commentary Epistles of 1 & 2 Thessalonians Commentary

What!?? No commentary on Hezekiah?  What kind of a series is that?

Ted Hans said:

"What kind of a series is that"  An Evangelical series with a high view of Scripture. Before you post any comments just remember Francis & Alain will be watching! It is a good series not very detail but the authors expound the scriptures with principles consistent with inerrancy. I think the authors were students of Dallas theological seminary.

As the scriptures say, "Can anything good come out of Dallas?" 

Ted Hans said:

George Somsel said:

As the scriptures say, "Can anything good come out of Dallas?" 

  Yes

Luke 1:1-9:50 - Darrell L. Bock , Dallas Theological Seminary

Luke 9:51-24:53 - Darrell L. Bock, Dallas Theological Seminary

Act - Darrell L. Bock, Dallas Theological Seminary

Baker Exegetical Commentary on the New Testament

Greek Grammar Beyond the Basics by Daniel B. Wallace

 

Perhaps that's the exception which proves the rule.

Bohuslav Wojnar said:

By the way, I love NET Bible and it has been heavily influanced by Dallas, if I am not mistaken...

<!--
@page { margin: 0.79in }
P { margin-bottom: 0.08in }
-->

You are right, some people I know consider it the DTS Bible. Not
to mention the notes are basically the original language notes of
most of the the DTS staff.

Any update on the logos version of this?

Ken Hepting said:

AMG is a weak commentary. Their all too brief  'opinion' lacks sufficient impetus that might otherwise cause one to delve deeper into the ultimate intention of God for having created man. Compare Revelation 3:1-6 from the any translation with AMG's commentary to see what I am driving at.

I disagree. I am currently reading through Elmer Towns' commentary on John and it is certainly not "weak". 

I, too, would like to see this series in Logos. [Y][Y]

Weak. You might have a different bias but it is not weak