Parsing question
I am reading through 1 Kings 17 in BHS/WIVU and the pop-up syntactical information for מְקֹשֶׁשֶׁת in 1 Kin. 17:10 says it is Piel. However, the lexicons I have are all defining it as Polel, which I understand as a subcategory of Piel. However, why doesn't the pop-up window define it as such?
Does Logos determine the syntactical info that shows in these pop-up windows, or the resource? If Logos, why is it that the LHB correctly identifies it as Polel? If the info for BHS is an error, how would I go about reporting it?
Comments
-
Logos has more control over the LHB, it's developed in house. For the BHS/WIVU it has been morphologically tagged by another group. Logos pop ups are simply displaying that underlying tagging.
0 -
Okay, thanks for the info.
0 -
Jordan Litchfield said:
If the info for BHS is an error, how would I go about reporting it?
Reporting can be done by right click on word to report typo
Keep Smiling [:)]
0 -
Jordan Litchfield said:
I am reading through 1 Kings 17 in BHS/WIVU and the pop-up syntactical information for מְקֹשֶׁשֶׁת in 1 Kin. 17:10 says it is Piel. However, the lexicons I have are all defining it as Polel, which I understand as a subcategory of Piel. However, why doesn't the pop-up window define it as such?
Newer BHW with Westminster Hebrew Morphology 4.18 shows pôʿēl stem.
Keep Smiling [:)]
0 -
Okay, thanks.
The newer edition isn't in Logos yet though, correct?
0 -
It has been available for ever so long... not sure when I got it, but I've been using it for what seems like maybe 3 years.
0 -
[Y]
0 -
The "Word By Word" section in the "Exegetical Guide" compares differences between parsing systems according to the original language resources you prioritize. ALSO, the "Morphology" section of the "Grammar" department in the "Exegetical Guide" can take you deeper.
0
