What is the best Christian resource on dinosaurs?

I am looking for a scholarly treatment of the question. I am not interested in vague references to Behemoth and Leviathan or endless questioning of datation, allegations of fraud, etc. I am interested in a resource that takes the evidence seriously and deals with it with scholarly rigour in relation to the Christian faith and creationism.
Put differently I am not looking for a book that makes Christians feel good and think they're okay. I am more interested in a resource that would be a compelling case for a critically-minded unbeliever.
Any recommendation (preferably in Logos)?
Comments
-
Francis said:
I am looking for a scholarly treatment of the question. I am not interested in vague references to Behemoth and Leviathan or endless questioning of datation, allegations of fraud, etc. I am interested in a resource that takes the evidence seriously and deals with it with scholarly rigour in relation to the Christian faith and creationism.
Put differently I am not looking for a book that makes Christians feel good and think they're okay. I am more interested in a resource that would be a compelling case for a critically-minded unbeliever.
Any recommendation (preferably in Logos)?
Francis
I've long been interested in Genesis 1-11 issues. I'm finding Hugh Ross the most satisfying. I haven't read him on dinosaurs as such, but it might be worth checking out the index previews. He is an old earth creationist.
0 -
Francis said:
I am interested in a resource that takes the evidence seriously and deals with it with scholarly rigour in relation to the Christian faith and creationism.
I have a fairly good collection of these type of books on my shelves (40-50 or so). Pretty much none of them are available in Logos.
Depending on your view of scripture and/or worldview, it won't be possible for you to feel good with some of the stuff out there, and it won't be possible for you to not feel good with other stuff. The same is true of your "critically-minded unbeliever." That person will feel good about what supports their own worldview and won't like what opposes it. There's no free lunch on this issue, and in my experience, a "compelling case" is not possible without the faith to back it up (and that faith is essential for any of the sides in the debate, including the completely secular neo-darwinian side).
Good luck!
Eating a steady diet of government cheese, and living in a van down by the river.
0 -
Depending on your creation timeline... (and walking the line of keeping theology out of this forum)...
The Hebrew scriptures should be silent about dinosaurs (indeed, they are!) because they never crossed paths with one. They were dead long before humankind.
If your creation timeline is much shorter... well... good luck!
0 -
-
Paul Caneparo said:
I've long been interested in Genesis 1-11 issues. I'm finding Hugh Ross the most satisfying. I haven't read him on dinosaurs as such, but it might be worth checking out the index previews. He is an old earth creationist.
I second that suggestion.
Here are a number of articles on dinosaurs by Hugh Ross:
https://www.reasons.org/explore/publications/rtb-101/dinosaurs
0 -
Francis said:
I am looking for a scholarly treatment of the question. I am not interested in vague references to Behemoth and Leviathan or endless questioning of datation, allegations of fraud, etc. I am interested in a resource that takes the evidence seriously and deals with it with scholarly rigour in relation to the Christian faith and creationism.
Put differently I am not looking for a book that makes Christians feel good and think they're okay. I am more interested in a resource that would be a compelling case for a critically-minded unbeliever.
Any recommendation (preferably in Logos)?
I guess I'd wonder your need for the word 'Christian' vs 'Biblical' or similar (no offense). I only pose the question, since a tight reading or loose reading is largely a denominational thing. What is a day? Or what is a light? Hebrew from long, long ago.
And 'dinosaurs' are obvious but a tiny subset of the evidence of 'something' ... everything from petrified trees, to tiny insects. And one need not even have to deal with millions of years. Logically anything over 7,000 years or so is at issue.
Answering, I've not seen a good discussion. One of my favorites is 'Oxygen; the Molecule That Made the World' (Lane). The issue it looks at is the common denominator of the whole thing (a terrible poison that fuels life, beginning to end).
"If myth is ideology in narrative form, then scholarship is myth with footnotes." B. Lincolm 1999.
0 -
Francis said:
I am interested in a resource that takes the evidence seriously and deals with it with scholarly rigour in relation to the Christian faith and creationism.
Chapter 4 "Signs of Design" in God's Crime Scene includes:
EFFICIENCY/IRREDUCIBLE COMPLEXITY
The natural mechanisms of strict evolutionary processes can’t explain the flagellum for an important reason: these processes can’t account for efficient, irreducibly complex micro-machines. Darwinian evolution requires a gradual and incremental pathway to any finished micro-machine. Like complex structures built from Lego building blocks, sophisticated micro-machines, if assembled through an additive process of natural selection, must come into existence incrementally—“block by block.”
Wallace, J. W. (2015). God’s crime scene: a cold-case detective examines the evidence for a divinely created universe. Colorado Springs, CO: David C. Cook.
J. Warner Wallace, a detective, also authored Cold-Case Christianity and Cold-Case Christianity for Kids
Keep Smiling [:)]
0 -
Francis said:
Any recommendation (preferably in Logos)?
Henry Morris has several Logos resources => https://www.logos.com/products/search?Author=6527%7cHenry+M.+Morris and ebook => Exploring the Evidence for Creation: Reasons to Believe the Biblical Account
Thankful for a printed Henry Morris Study Bible.
Keep Smiling [:)]
0 -
If you want a view of the broader issues that is critical but still takes Scripture seriously, I'd recommend Genesis 1 as Ancient Cosmology by John Walton. Or if you want something that doesn't take as long to read, he has The Lost World of Genesis One: Ancient Cosmology and the Origins Debate.
0 -
Thank you all for your suggestions.
0 -
What is the best Christian resource on dinosaurs?
'A Church History of Scotland' without doubt.
tootle pip
Mike
Now tagging post-apocalyptic fiction as current affairs. Latest Logos, MacOS, iOS and iPadOS
0 -
Mike Binks said:
What is the best Christian resource on dinosaurs?
'A Church History of Scotland' without doubt.
[:)]
Using adventure and community to challenge young people to continually say "yes" to God
0 -
Mike Binks said:
'A Church History of Scotland' without doubt.
Mike is the daily winner of the internet.
[:D]
Eating a steady diet of government cheese, and living in a van down by the river.
0 -
The website Answers in Genesis along with Creation.com are great spots
0 -
Francis said:
I am looking for a scholarly treatment of the question. I am not interested in vague references to Behemoth and Leviathan or endless questioning of datation, allegations of fraud, etc. I am interested in a resource that takes the evidence seriously and deals with it with scholarly rigour in relation to the Christian faith and creationism.
Put differently I am not looking for a book that makes Christians feel good and think they're okay. I am more interested in a resource that would be a compelling case for a critically-minded unbeliever.
Any recommendation (preferably in Logos)?
Francis. Further to my suggestion of Hugh Ross I see this book has a chapter on dinosaurs.
0 -
Hidden Treasures is currently on sale, but unfortunately not in Logos because of the added value and therefore non-price matching policy.
0 -
The Dinosaur Dilemma: Fact or Fantasy is a young-earth, Christian view of dinosaurs i.e. they co-existed with man.
Dave
===Windows 11 & Android 13
0 -
I understand what you are asking about, however, let me offer an alternative perspective. The question of dinosaurs is a scientific question about paleontology. Because the geological, astronomical, and paleontological evidence is clear and irrefutable, as believers it’s time to except the evidence of science. The universe is 14.3 billion years old, and the earth 4.5 billion years old. And the dinosaurs lived 66 to 250,000,000 years ago. In fact, the T-Rex is closer in time to us than the Stegosaurus. With that, the best resource is a paleontology book on dinosaurs. Unfortunately, Christians don’t write those very often.
I love my Christian brothers who have a different perspective on the timeline of creation. But Answers in Genesis is simply deceiving fellow believers from the truth God has made apparent to those who look. And I like the recommendations of John Walton’s Works.
0 -
Rick Carmickle said:
I understand what you are asking about, however, let me offer an alternative perspective. The question of dinosaurs is a scientific question about paleontology. Because the geological, astronomical, and paleontological evidence is clear and irrefutable, as believers it’s time to except the evidence of science. The earth is 14.3 billion years old, and the earth 4.5 billion years old. And the dinosaurs lived 66 to 250,000,000 years ago. In fact, the T Rex is closer in time to us than the Stegosaurus. With that, the best resource is a paleontology book on dinosaurs. Unfortunately, Christians don’t write those very often.
I love my Christian brothers who have a different perspective on the timeline of creation. But Answers in Genesis is simply deceiving fellow believers from the truth God has made a parent to those who look. And I like the recommendations of John Walton’s Works.
This. I second this.
0 -
Rick Carmickle said:
Because the geological, astronomical, and paleontological evidence is clear and irrefutable, as believers it’s time to except the evidence of science.
It is also important for Christians to understand what science is - it is the current "best fit" for predicting/explaining behavior of the physical world. Abductive logic i.e. the logic of science is not seeking truth, it is seeking accuracy of predictions. It is always provisional - some even more accurate model may come along at any time. Christians make a horrendous logical error when they confuse their quest for Truth with sciences' quest for accurate prediction. The resources I would suggest on the subject say: ... i.e. I would concentrate on why the question arises rather than the question itself. I am not familiar with the parallel Protestant sources, my apologies.
[quote]
159 Faith and science: “Though faith is above reason, there can never be any real discrepancy between faith and reason. Since the same God who reveals mysteries and infuses faith has bestowed the light of reason on the human mind, God cannot deny himself, nor can truth ever contradict truth.”37 “Consequently, methodical research in all branches of knowledge, provided it is carried out in a truly scientific manner and does not override moral laws, can never conflict with the faith, because the things of the world and the things of faith derive from the same God. The humble and persevering investigator of the secrets of nature is being led, as it were, by the hand of God in spite of himself, for it is God, the conserver of all things, who made them what they are.”38 (283; 2293)
Catholic Church, Catechism of the Catholic Church, 2nd Ed. (Vatican City: Libreria Editrice Vaticana, 1997), 43.
[quote]
36. Now many of our contemporaries seem to fear that a closer bond between human activity and religion will work against the independence of men, of societies, or of the sciences.
If by the autonomy of earthly affairs we mean that created things and societies themselves enjoy their own laws and values which must be gradually deciphered, put to use, and regulated by men, then it is entirely right to demand that autonomy. Such is not merely required by modern man, but harmonizes also with the will of the Creator. For by the very circumstance of their having been created, all things are endowed with their own stability, truth, goodness, proper laws and order. Man must respect these as he isolates them by the appropriate methods of the individual sciences or arts. Therefore if methodical investigation within every branch of learning is carried out in a genuinely scientific manner and in accord with moral norms, it never truly conflicts with faith, for earthly matters and the concerns of faith derive from the same God.6 Indeed whoever labors to penetrate the secrets of reality with a humble and steady mind, even though he is unaware of the fact, is nevertheless being led by the hand of God, who holds all things in existence, and gives them their identity. Consequently, we cannot but deplore certain habits of mind, which are sometimes found too among Christians, which do not sufficiently attend to the rightful independence of science and which, from the arguments and controversies they spark, lead many minds to conclude that faith and science are mutually opposed.7
But if the expression, the independence of temporal affairs, is taken to mean that created things do not depend on God, and that man can use them without any reference to their Creator, anyone who acknowledges God will see how false such a meaning is. For without the Creator the creature would disappear. For their part, however, all believers of whatever religion always hear His revealing voice in the discourse of creatures. When God is forgotten, however, the creature itself grows unintelligible.
Catholic Church, “Pastoral Constitution on the Church in the Modern World: Gaudium Et Spes,” in Vatican II Documents (Vatican City: Libreria Editrice Vaticana, 2011).Orthodox Bishop Alfeyev: "To be a theologian means to have experience of a personal encounter with God through prayer and worship."; Orthodox proverb: "We know where the Church is, we do not know where it is not."
0 -
I would recommend anything by Denis O. Lamoureux, particularly I Love Jesus & I Accept Evolution, which was written specifically to address the question of the Bible and dinosaurs. Unfortunately, it's not in Logos, but Lamoureux is a contributor to two books that are available in Logos: Four Views on the Historical Adam and How I Changed My Mind About Evolution: Evangelicals Reflect on Faith and Science. Lamoureux is associate professor of science and religion at St. Joseph’s College in the University of Alberta. He holds three earned doctoral degrees—dentistry, evangelical theology and evolutionary biology and is extremely well qualified to write on this topic. He also has a master's degree from my alma mater, Regent College, and I've met him -- he came back to speak at a forum once while I was still there. His story of how he changed his mind (which he tells in his chapter of the aforementioned book) is quite amazing. He started out as an atheist, was born again and became a young earth creationist, and through a trajectory that you'll have to read his story to find out, wound up an evolutionary creationist.
Here is the preface of I Love Jesus & I Accept Evolution:
THIS IS A TRUE story. A number of years ago I attended a conference on the relationship between science and religion at a leading university. One evening there was a public lecture that featured one of the most important anti-evolutionists in the country. During the question and answer period, a young man came to the microphone in front of about one thousand people. In a very respectful way, he asked a simple question, “What about dinosaurs, how do they fit into the Bible?”
I will never forget the answer that this university professor gave. In a mean-spirited tone, he scolded the young man, “This is an irrelevant question. It doesn’t matter because it has nothing to do with what I’m saying tonight.” And then there was dead silence. It was a very awkward and uncomfortable moment for everyone in the auditorium, including a number of individuals who were associated with this professor and his view of origins. In fact, I was sitting with a number of these anti-evolutionists. Without any response, the young man turned away from the microphone, walked up the aisle, and went out of the auditorium. No one got out of their seat to follow him. Not even one of the Christian anti-evolutionists with whom I was seated.
But I immediately sensed the Lord calling me to comfort this young man. Yes, me, of all people, an evolutionist! I went out to the foyer and found him. He was shaking like a leaf. I introduced myself as a university professor and complemented him on what I thought was an excellent question. And then he said to me with trembling voice, “All I wanted to know from Dr. _______ was where do dinosaurs fit into the Bible, because I would like to tell my high school friends.” Wow! Here was a 16- or 17-year-old boy who had the courage to stand up before a large audience at a major university and ask a question that he believed would help his high school classmates understand the relationship between Scripture and science. He wanted to explain and defend his Christian faith to his friends.
I realized I had a problem. I had just affirmed this student’s question, but how would I explain in only a few minutes where dinosaurs fit into the Bible? My university career has focused on the modern origins debate and questions like this one. But there are no quick and easy answers. I felt handcuffed. Standing before me was a teenager who, along with his classmates, had grown up watching the Jurassic Park movies. They all know that dinosaurs once existed. And here was a young man with a solid faith and a question that undoubtedly many Christians his age have asked. I wanted to tell him that I love Jesus and that I accept evolution. But this was not the right thing to say at that volatile moment. It would only have added to the confusion. All I could do was affirm his wonderful faith, remarkable courage, and intellectual integrity. I told him that loving God with our mind, as Jesus has commanded us, requires that we ask tough questions like the one he had just asked the speaker. I knew he wanted more, but I couldn’t deliver it.
This honest question and shameful answer still echo in my soul years later. As a matter of fact, they have inspired me to write this book. In many ways, it is my attempt at offering a response to this high school student and his classmates. The answer that I give will surprise a lot of Christians. First, I will suggest that the purpose of the Bible is not to reveal scientific facts about how God created the world. To use the words of Billy Graham in the epigraph at the front of this book, “The Bible is not a book of science.”[1] In the same way that the Lord meets each of us wherever we happen to be, the Holy Spirit came down to the level of the ancient biblical writers and used their understanding of nature to reveal that He was the Creator of the entire world. The intention of the biblical creation accounts is to disclose spiritual truths for nourishing our personal relationship with Jesus.
Second, I will propose that God created the universe and life through evolution. This view of origins is known as “evolutionary creation.” It claims that evolution is a creative process similar to that which the Lord uses to form every one of us in our mother’s womb. No Christian today believes that God comes out of heaven to attach an ear, nose, or arm to a developing baby. Instead, we understand that He employs natural processes to create human beings. In fact, God is the creator of all the laws of nature, including these developmental (embryological) mechanisms. I believe that this is also the case with evolution. The Creator planned and maintained evolutionary laws and processes in order to create the entire world and us. In other words, our origin is not a fluke or mistake.
My view of origins is built on the traditional Christian belief that the Lord reveals Himself through Two Divine Books. First, the Book of God’s Words is the Bible. It discloses that we are the only creatures who were made in the Image of God, and that our Creator loves us more that we can ever imagine. I personally understand the power of Scripture. By reading the gospel of John, I was born again thirty years ago. Experiencing the fact that Jesus died for our sins and then rose physically from the grave changed my life completely and forever. Today, I drink from the Bible every morning for my spiritual nourishment in order to strengthen my personal relationship with the Lord. Second, the Book of God’s Works is the natural world. Modern science examines its structure, operation, and origin. Microscopes and telescopes assist in revealing that the creation is incredibly amazing! Beauty, complexity, and functionality in nature point to the mind of God. Stated in another way, the universe and life reflect intelligent design.
The Two Divine Books complement each other in revealing the glory and character of the Creator. I will propose an intimate and fruitful relationship between Biblical faith and evolutionary science. Scripture discloses the spiritual character of the world, while science reveals the divine method of creation. To be sure, such a provocative claim is rarely heard in our churches. This might be offensive to some. But no insult is intended, and I will ask my brothers and sisters in Christ for their patience as they read this book.
In order to understand my view of origins, I strongly advise that the chapters be read in sequence. The conclusions in later chapters are dependent on the terms and ideas presented in earlier ones. There is a short glossary at the back of the book to assist readers with the terminology. I suggest that they introduce themselves to these concepts before starting chapter 1.
No doubt about it, I Love Jesus & I Accept Evolution is a challenging book for most Christians. Readers must be warned that I will make a number of pointed and even disturbing statements, especially with regard to the meaning of several biblical passages. You will be uncomfortable at times. However, there is a generation of young Christian men and women who want to know where dinosaurs fit into the Bible. This is not an irrelevant question. Rather, it’s a very important one. And I believe that asking tough and honest questions is part of the commandment to love God with our mind (Matt 22:37). Hopefully, this book will make a modest contribution in offering some answers on origins and Christian faith.
[1] Billy Graham, “Doubts and Certainties: David Frost interview” BBC–2, 1964, in David Frost, Billy Graham: Personal Thoughts of a Public Man. 30 years of Conversations with David Frost (Colorado Springs: Chariot Victor, 1997), 73–74.
0 -
Hugh Ross is also an old earth creationist but his writings demonstrate how in his view as a scientist evolution is statistically impossible as well as an unproven theory. I used to embrace young earth creationism but have found Hugh Ross more satisfactory in terms of reconciling the Bible and known scientific facts. I'm stating this purely as a personal view and not an attempt to defend a view of enter a debate.
0 -
Thanks, Rosie
Orthodox Bishop Alfeyev: "To be a theologian means to have experience of a personal encounter with God through prayer and worship."; Orthodox proverb: "We know where the Church is, we do not know where it is not."
0 -
I don't think anyone mentioned Institute for Creation Research (ICR): http://www.icr.org/article/young-earth-creationist-bibliography/
ICR has books like (some are more scholarly than others):
- Baker, Mace, Dinosaurs (Bible Science Association, 1995).
- Gish, Duane T., Dinosaurs by Design (Master Books, 1992).
- Von Fange, Erich A., Genesis and the Dinosaur (Living Word Services, 1990).
- Whitcomb, Norma, Those Mysterious Dinosaurs (Presbyterian and Reformed Publ Co., 1991).
0 -
Rick Carmickle said:
The universe is 14.3 billion years old
Since when? Yesterday it was 13.8 billion years old...a couple of years ago it was 13.7. When I was a kid, it was 5-6 billion. This puts a whole new spin on the meaning of
Rick Carmickle said:clear and irrefutable
Just so you all know, B'heimohtth was not a dinosaur.
Also, the Bible says one thing and science says something else--they don't agree. That is by YHWH's purposeful design prerogative. He expects you to choose which you accept as worthy of your adherence...the word of His mouth or your lying eyes.
MJ. Smith said:Consequently, methodical research in all branches of knowledge, provided it is carried out in a truly scientific manner and does not override moral laws, can never conflict with the faith, because the things of the world and the things of faith derive from the same God.
This quote is based on presumptive and speculative assumption. The notion that YHWH is incapable of misdirection is nearly universal and entirely unbiblical.
ASUS ProArt x570s Creator, AMD R9 5950x, HyperX 64gb 3600 RAM, ASUS Strix RTX 2080 ti
"The Unbelievable Work...believe it or not." Little children...Biblical prophecy is not Christianity's friend.
0 -
I guess what this thread shows is that you're not going to find an uncontroversial answer.
Personally, I'd be more inclined to look at a few different commentaries on key passages first - from Genesis, Job, a few Psalms etc - and then head into the blogosphere/chat with people at church etc to see what others are saying/what passages they appeal to, then head back into commentaries on those new passages. You might benefit from listening to debates on the topic from YouTube or the Unbelievable podcast etc. You can listen to those arguments and then test them out against scripture/commentaries etc.
You'll know better than any of us which commentaries you trust and which ones outside your tradition challenge you in ways that you're receptive to. I'd love to inflict my own views on you (basically: read John Walton!) but... well... yeah. Christians with very conservative views of scripture disagree on the topic, let alone those with more progressive/alternative approaches etc (not trying to describe anyone pejoratively).
0 -
The writings of Hugh Ross and his perspective on the different geologic ages of earth corresponding to the seven days of creation were helpful in my transition from a strict six-day creationist to a position that wasn’t hostile to basic science. It wasn’t so much the science that I needed (which is clear to anyone approaching it fairly and honestly), but it was more the need for a biblical framework to make sense of it all. That’s where Ross helped the most.
Of course I didn’t stay there. Ross gave way fairly quickly to ID, but once that proved insufficient (as Ross’s worked eventually did too), I was introduced to the writings of Lamoureux (mentioned above) and John H. Walton (who has numerous excellent and relevant books available in Logos) that helped me to understand the Bible in a way that allows compatibility to the modern astronomical, geological, and biological sciences. Tremper Longman III also has written on this subject too.
The trick to this is grounding the Bible in its milieu, and not engaging in eisegesis by trying to force it to conform to our modern standards. Lamoureux and Walton are excellent in this regard, and the latter has done considerable work in Old Testament Bible backgrounds to aid the reader in the same.
So to address your main question, you will never find an accurate account of dinosaurs in the Bible because dinosaurs are not in the Bible to begin with. Ancient Israelites were not aware of their existence, and God inspired the scriptures to speak to their particular situation in life, in ways relevant to them. The question of dinosaurs wasn’t even on their radar.
So I would definitely recommend these two authors in that regard. I would encourage you also to seek out information from non-hostile sources on the relevant science too. Dennis Venema, a Christian evolutionary biologist, is an excellent resource here. He writes regularly for Biologos.org, and has numerous lectures on YouTube too. Highly recommended.
Hope this provides you some helpful guidance!
0 -
Greg Masone said:
John H. Walton (who has numerous excellent and relevant books available in Logos) that helped me to understand the Bible in a way that allows compatibility to the modern astronomical, geological, and biological sciences.
The question that rarely gets asked is whether YHWH considers "compatibility" of Biblical revelation with the above fields of inquiry to be nothing less and nothing more than an idolatrous worshipping of creation over the Creator. Walton, et. al, may give an impression that they've shaken the puzzle pieces into place, resulting in the desperately sought "agreement" of revelation with "reality", but plenty of significant disconnects persist. Scholars say the Bible must give way to history and science; evangelicals & fellow travelers, exercising their patented "Conclusion therefor Premise" method of reasoning, insist the the Bible and observable creation MUST agree perfectly (damn any evidence to the contrary--it MUST be a satanic conspiracy). Meanwhile, YHWH, the creator and manipulator of time and space, expects all considerations external to His Word are to be ignored, even if He is responsible for the existence of those considerations.
ASUS ProArt x570s Creator, AMD R9 5950x, HyperX 64gb 3600 RAM, ASUS Strix RTX 2080 ti
"The Unbelievable Work...believe it or not." Little children...Biblical prophecy is not Christianity's friend.
0 -
Greg Masone said:
So to address your main question, you will never find an accurate account of dinosaurs in the Bible because dinosaurs are not in the Bible to begin with. Ancient Israelites were not aware of their existence, and God inspired the scriptures to speak to their particular situation in life, in ways relevant to them. The question of dinosaurs wasn’t even on their radar.
Just to confuse the discussion, confirming Mr Paul's YHWH-ist thoughts, dinosaurs were carefully placed in the late Triassic and Jurassic layers. The levant was given the Pleistocene and Holocene layers, which were, of course, dinosaur-free.
But more seriously, one of the very interesting volumes in the present collections sale:
https://www.logos.com/product/45804/near-eastern-archaeology-a-reader-2nd-ed
Which covers a LOT of water-front, all the way down to how wide roads were: 2 lanes, oddly enough.
"If myth is ideology in narrative form, then scholarship is myth with footnotes." B. Lincolm 1999.
0 -
Greg Masone:
The story of your intellectual journey parallels mine to an extraordinary degree. I too move away from 6-day literal creation theory, particularly because of my interest in science and my desire to investigate and defend the young earth theory. Instead, I discovered it’s scientific inadequacies in light of demonstratable science. So I moved to an old-earth view, spending several years with the construct developed by Hugh Ross. In fact, I had several lunches with Dr. Ross in Pasadena at Cal Tech about 1998-99. Although I still appreciate his work, and love him as a brother, I have benefited from, and hav been persuaded by, the explanations proposed by John Walton and others. When you watch the BioLogos videos of Debra Harsma and others on YouTube, including Francis Collins, I am persuaded that true believers can also operate in a scientifically literate matter. I agree that this is a hard journey for many Christians to take. But I do not believe that those of us who have taken this journey are in anyway denying the truth Faith. To the contrary, I am more inspired by the greatness of God who created in such a way that we can scientifically determine his creative activity. Last month, I spent the day at Dinosaur National Monument in Utah/Colorado and could only imagine the greatness of God in his creative activity 200 million years ago. I fear that many young people will struggle to maintain their faith unless the stranglehold of 6-day creationism is broken. But I believe that young earth creationism will go the way of a geocentric universe in the coming years. I believe now is the time to work this issue out in the church so that we can move beyond it and continue to evangelize with the wonderful message of the gospel. Soli Deo Gloria.
0 -
Rick Carmickle said:
Greg Masone:
The story of your intellectual journey parallels mine to an extraordinary degree....
Wow, thats really cool to see. Thank you for sharing your story. I agree also that it can be a barrier to evangelization. In college, when I was working these ideas out, this frequently came up in my talks with non-Christians. I'm incredibly happy to see the work thats been put out in this area since then (just the last fifteen years), and it gives me hope this can lead to more fruitful discussions.
0 -
David Paul said:
The question that rarely gets asked is whether YHWH considers "compatibility" of Biblical revelation with the above fields of inquiry to be nothing less and nothing more than an idolatrous worshipping of creation over the Creator.
Frankly, I see it no different than how we approach meteorology, embryology, or astronomy. Do you insist your weatherman acknowledge God as the cause of the weather? Job learned that lesson the hard way, why can't he?
God knit us together in our mother's womb, so wouldn't that make seeking a natural understanding of human development idolatry?
Should we even bring up the church's long stance on geocentrism, and how heliocentrism was mocked when first proposed, and scripture brought out against it, and then, as evidence mounted, how it forced a series of interpretive changes so we could safely accept scripture's viewpoint of a fixed earth alongside science's undeniable moving earth?
Science can inform us and correct our interpretations of scripture, which are not divinely inspired or part of holy scripture, so I don't understand the problem with rethinking things that may have been thought about in the past with more ignorance than knowledge.
I always figured abandoning wrong interpretations was a good thing. Wouldn't you agree?
0 -
One would have to say that asking this question REX your credibility [:D]
0 -
It was about 40 years ago when I've read a book that explains the creation story as the order of the nature. Unfortunately I cannot remember the book name. It goes something like this:
Those created earlier are higher in hierarchy and those created later are more complex and better. Sometimes the hierarchy is inverted, e.g. the land is given under the humans. But the sea is not given under the humans, thus no human can calm the sea.
Also most people all over the world have the idea of God and creation, therefore I think just describing the creation is not really necessary, but the idea of sabbath may be the focus of the story.
Gold package, and original language material and ancient text material, SIL and UBS books, discourse Hebrew OT and Greek NT. PC with Windows 11
0 -
FYI: today's (21 Sept 18) daily deal is from Hugh Ross (49% off): https://www.logos.com/product/5286/creation-as-science
0 -
I always find this topic and others related to it hilarious - there is absolutely no objective data about them- period- other than bones but there are volumes of ridiculous speculation and just to be plain lies written about them.
Did they exist at some point, yes, but we know absolutely nothing of their environment, behaviour or demise, except it was at God's direction.
0 -
Imo, you were more on track here...
Whyndell Grizzard said:there is absolutely no objective data about them- period- other than bones
...than here...
Whyndell Grizzard said:Did they exist at some point, yes
There are very good reasons to doubt dinosaurs ever lived.
ASUS ProArt x570s Creator, AMD R9 5950x, HyperX 64gb 3600 RAM, ASUS Strix RTX 2080 ti
"The Unbelievable Work...believe it or not." Little children...Biblical prophecy is not Christianity's friend.
0 -
David Paul said:
That wasn't a rhetorical question...I'd really like to know where that clod of information came from.
ASUS ProArt x570s Creator, AMD R9 5950x, HyperX 64gb 3600 RAM, ASUS Strix RTX 2080 ti
"The Unbelievable Work...believe it or not." Little children...Biblical prophecy is not Christianity's friend.
0 -
[8-)]
0 -
David Paul said:
That wasn't a rhetorical question...I'd really like to know where that clod of information came from.
Your problem is a bit closer to home. I like Manatho (in Logos) and Philo of Byblos (not). As the Egyptian rock histories inched their way backwards in time, the Alexandrian jews were confronted with a Torah increasingly set in proverbial stone. The solution at the time, was to shift to allegory, which the later Christians also embraced. And Genesis re-writes.
4,000 BC is a tight squeeze.
"If myth is ideology in narrative form, then scholarship is myth with footnotes." B. Lincolm 1999.
0 -
Denise said:David Paul said:
That wasn't a rhetorical question...I'd really like to know where that clod of information came from.
Your problem is a bit closer to home. I like Manatho (in Logos) and Philo of Byblos (not). As the Egyptian rock histories inched their way backwards in time, the Alexandrian jews were confronted with a Torah increasingly set in proverbial stone. The solution at the time, was to shift to allegory, which the later Christians also embraced. And Genesis re-writes.
4,000 BC is a tight squeeze.
Did you quote the correct comment of mine? It sounds like you may have intended to quote my comment about dinosaurs never having existed.
Seriously, the number was 13.8 billion last I heard, and it was fairly recently that I heard it. 14.3 billion is a completely new and out-of-the-blue number to me, and a drastic shift of half-a-billion years would be the kind of thing I would expect to hear in concert with a huge mea culpa explaining how & why they managed to be off by such a wide margin for so long. In other words, there should be something to go with the 14.3 number besides tea biscuits. I seriously want to know where the number came from.
To your comment, 4,000 B.C. (6K from here) may seem tight, unless we're talking about a being with mad manipulation-of-the-space-time-fabric skills. Creating a world with bones in the ground isn't that big of a deal, is it? Most people balk at the implicit notion that YHWH would have been deliberately causing confusion by indicating (through apparent evidence) that the world was billions of years in existence even though it was only fabricated by Him the aforementioned 6K years ago. But that resistance is fundamentally a preference for idolatry over YHWH's spoken word.
He said it's 6000 years old. He made it look much older. Which are you going to believe? WHY???
ASUS ProArt x570s Creator, AMD R9 5950x, HyperX 64gb 3600 RAM, ASUS Strix RTX 2080 ti
"The Unbelievable Work...believe it or not." Little children...Biblical prophecy is not Christianity's friend.
0 -
I haven't fully read what's on this page, but it gets at what I'm suggesting. Creating stars in the sky by fiat REQUIRES that they have a much longer apparent lifespan (due to distance of light traveled) than the moments/seconds/minutes/etc. that would be experienced by earth-bound observers (say 'Aadhaam and Hhawaah). Preferring a "natural" explanation to the Biblically-revealed one is essentially to believe in a God that has no God powers. If you believe the universe REALLY IS 13.8 (or 14.3) billion years old, you are essentially also insisting that the Red Sea (or Reed Sea) never parted, that Yeishuua` never healed with spit or a tallit, that a donkey or serpent never spoke, and that your prayers can't be answered. If you don't understand why that is the case, you need to look in the mirror and ask yourself why you have never been diligent enough to actually think about the consequences of your supposed beliefs.
Let me be very clear about the second sentence above: if you believe in young earth creation, YHWH must practice something akin to deception (although it is only going to be a problem for the most hidebound literalists). The nearest star is 4.3 light years away, so if ':Elohhiym says "Let there be stars in the sky for appointed times and seasons", the biggest miracle isn't that the star appears out of thin air; it's that the light that would have had to leave 4.3 YEARS EARLIER in order to reach you is striking your retina moments after He says the words. The rule that He created to account for the light's "natural" function MUST also be controverted by the necessity of His will that the effect be instantaneous. In other words, anyone who insists that the "created order" MUST follow the rules of every day functioning are effectively 1) denying YHWH the ability to create, or 2) denying what He had to do to make His creation.
To sum up, the world we experience daily, having the physical laws it does, HAS to appear older than 6000 years, even if it has only ever been in existence for 6000 years. Call it "deceptive" if you must...but it is also required. The necessary corollary to this is that anyone who feels compelled to believe the earth is more than 6000 years old is guilty of pre-schoolish gullibility...you really have "believed" your lying eyes. But that's what Believers do best, right? Believe!
Addendum: I have read the article at the link above and the writer, though adequately discussing the subject, concludes that what I'm suggesting isn't plausible for the reason most people choose to reject it. He says that available detailed scientific evidence that suggests a far greater than 6000 year-old universe against a universe that is in fact only 6000 years would be essentially "deceptive"...and He, assuming ':Elohhiym CAN'T be deceptive, therefore rejects the notion in favor of one he says is more plausible (but which is less in agreement with Scripture, whether he wants to believe that or not). The question is...does (or CAN) YHWH employ deception? Ask Yirm'yaahuu (Jer. 20:7 NASB).
ASUS ProArt x570s Creator, AMD R9 5950x, HyperX 64gb 3600 RAM, ASUS Strix RTX 2080 ti
"The Unbelievable Work...believe it or not." Little children...Biblical prophecy is not Christianity's friend.
0 -
David Paul said:
Preferring a "natural" explanation to the Biblically-revealed one is essentially to believe in a God that has no God powers.
This is a false statement on many grounds. A good example of why we avoid discussing theology in these forums.
Orthodox Bishop Alfeyev: "To be a theologian means to have experience of a personal encounter with God through prayer and worship."; Orthodox proverb: "We know where the Church is, we do not know where it is not."
0 -
MJ. Smith said:
This is a false statement on many grounds.
Well, perhaps it is to you, with your penchant for formal logic. I'm speaking informally, as people pretty much have to do unless they intend to break out p's and q's. If you feel that light "naturally" occurs without a star to produce it, have at it. If you feel it CAN'T (because that isn't "natural"), have at it. Either way, your "grounds" are already shifting under you.
For all that, I suspect plenty of folks might say...
MJ. Smith said:This is a false statement on many grounds.
...with regard to your end blurb:
"To be a theologian means to have experience of a personal encounter with God through prayer and worship."
It is certainly highly debatable.
Another nugget to chew on with your "formal" chompers...YHWH's will IS "special pleading".
ASUS ProArt x570s Creator, AMD R9 5950x, HyperX 64gb 3600 RAM, ASUS Strix RTX 2080 ti
"The Unbelievable Work...believe it or not." Little children...Biblical prophecy is not Christianity's friend.
0 -
The point I'm trying to establish, in light of the OPs question about "what is 'the' Christian response to the fact of dinosaur bones" may very well be "they require no response". I doubt you will find anything in Logos to make that case, but logic (despite MJ's disapproval) and Scripture indicate that fossils are a "tempting non issue"...and are deliberately so.
ASUS ProArt x570s Creator, AMD R9 5950x, HyperX 64gb 3600 RAM, ASUS Strix RTX 2080 ti
"The Unbelievable Work...believe it or not." Little children...Biblical prophecy is not Christianity's friend.
0 -
David Paul said:
...with regard to your end blurb:
"To be a theologian means to have experience of a personal encounter with God through prayer and worship."
It is certainly highly debatable.
Yes, it is highly debatable and interestingly so ... which is why I provided the source of the quote so a reader knows within what tradition the statement is to be interpreted. I do not use it as an answer to forum questions.
Orthodox Bishop Alfeyev: "To be a theologian means to have experience of a personal encounter with God through prayer and worship."; Orthodox proverb: "We know where the Church is, we do not know where it is not."
0 -
David Paul said:
Did you quote the correct comment of mine? It sounds like you may have intended to quote my comment about dinosaurs never having existed.
No, actually you qualified your original comment with 'living', to which science remains a theory. Your new comment 'existed' is more arguable, since the bulk of dinosaurs are simply stray bones with distingishing characteristics (if you read the scientific literature).
My comment referred to the tendency to 'go long', in the face of difficult issues much closer. Christians like to attack the atheists, forgetting their argument simple proves Baal indeed may have ridden the skies in a chariot. The closer-to-home issue, is pinpointing 'which god'. Or in the case of dino's, papering over Behemoth (sp), or the race for 'oldest' in Alexandria Egypt.
"If myth is ideology in narrative form, then scholarship is myth with footnotes." B. Lincolm 1999.
0 -
Greg Masone said:
the writings of Lamoureux (mentioned above) and John H. Walton (who has numerous excellent and relevant books available in Logos) that helped me to understand the Bible in a way that allows compatibility to the modern astronomical, geological, and biological sciences.
Here's a more philosophical critique of Walton's work: http://whatswrongwiththeworld.net/2015/03/review_of_john_h_waltons_the_l.html
(Though in my experience Walton and Lamoureux fans are ironically about as close minded when it comes to criticism as the YEC that rankle them so much.)
Potato resting atop 2020 Mac Pro stand.
0 -
Rick Carmickle said:
I understand what you are asking about, however, let me offer an alternative perspective. The question of dinosaurs is a scientific question about paleontology. Because the geological, astronomical, and paleontological evidence is clear and irrefutable, as believers it’s time to except the evidence of science. The universe is 14.3 billion years old, and the earth 4.5 billion years old. And the dinosaurs lived 66 to 250,000,000 years ago. In fact, the T-Rex is closer in time to us than the Stegosaurus. With that, the best resource is a paleontology book on dinosaurs. Unfortunately, Christians don’t write those very often.
I love my Christian brothers who have a different perspective on the timeline of creation. But Answers in Genesis is simply deceiving fellow believers from the truth God has made apparent to those who look. And I like the recommendations of John Walton’s Works.
Another irony is the theistic evolutionists who are every bit as ignorant of the philosophy of science (and how it effects this debate) as they believe (often rightly) the YECists are about science simpliciter.
Potato resting atop 2020 Mac Pro stand.
0 -
David Paul said:
if you believe in young earth creation, YHWH must practice something akin to deception (although it is only going to be a problem for the most hidebound literalists).
According to most theistic evolutionists and old earth creationists who admit that a prima facie reading of Genesis indicates a relatively young earth, YHWH was engaging in something akin to deception for the last several thousand years for people who read a text that appears to be saying something it isn't. In fact, it hasn't been until the last few decades with modern scholarship techniques and scientific paradigms that we've been able to make a compelling case that Genesis isn't saying what it appears to be saying.
Potato resting atop 2020 Mac Pro stand.
0