Strong's Talking Hebrew and Greek Dictionary

Hello, is there any idea how long it will take for y'all to fix the Talking part of this module?

The WordSearch resource required a click on a Strongs Number (link) to access the talking feature (somewhat like a right click on a word then choosing the lemma and pronounce icons from the popup menu).

Just hovering on the Strong's number would create a popup but you could not access the pronounce icon/feature.

You also had to have the Strong's numbers visible to use the feature, not the word itself. So from your description of how L3 worked I would not count on it working the same, but I could be happily mistaken.

Roy said:

You also had to have the Strong's numbers visible to use the feature, not the word itself. So from your description of how L3 worked I would not count on it working the same, but I could be happily mistaken.

I wish you were happily mistaken, but it ain't so. The picture you posted tells the tale. The insertion of the Strong's numbers into the text creates a massive visual distraction, not unlike a reverse interlinear, and reduces the amount of visible text by about half. Sadly, there really isn't any need for those numbers, as the link they represent could just as easily be connected to the words of the text itself, thus eliminating the need for all that clutter. I understand the appeal the pronunciation feature has for some people, but it holds no appeal for me because I know that somewhere around 1/3 to 1/2 of the pronunciations are likely inaccurate anyway.

As far as I can tell, the features available in this resource are already reproduced in Logos, although in different ways and through different methods and mechanisms. The RI feature that I greatly dislike is quite like what is shown above, though it is distributed in linear fashion rather than salted throughout. Also, Logos already has a pronunciation feature, though I'm not sure how it works as I have never used it. Still, if you've grown accustomed to this resource and how it works, I can understand wanting what you've paid for and become habituated to.

Ironically, I'm in the same boat, though with far less rosey prospects. I also became habituated to the way a program that I spent money on (to the tune of tens of thousands of dollars) worked, but unfortunately for me, the company that created that software unilaterally chose to abandon all of the mechanisms and methods I had come to rely on. Whereas I was left out in the cold, you WS customers are being effectively doted on, with FL even going to the length of reduplicating WS products and features that are already present elsewhere in Logos. I'm glad for you...I understand why you want those things you paid for and have become accustomed to. I feel the same way, but in contrast, I have been completely abandonned. At least 95% of the complaints I have about Logos pertain to features I used to use IN LOGOS that have either disappeared or have become completely broken and unusable.